# The History of the German Section of the Theosophical Society 1902-1913

## GA 250 — 24 October 1909, Berlin

### 41. Eighth General Assembly of the German Section of the Theosophical Society

Report in the “Mitteilungen für die Mitglieder der Deutschen Sektion der Theosophischen Gesellschaft (Hauptquartier Adyar), herausgegeben von Mathilde Scholl”, No. 10/1910

After the opening of the eighth General Assembly of the German Section of the Theosophical Society by the General Secretary Dr. Rudolf Steiner, the first item on the agenda was the determination of the voting ratio and, in connection with this, the presentation of the delegates of the individual branches.

Fräulein von Sivers read out the number of members of the various branches and then the number of delegates was determined.


The official welcoming address to the assembly by the chairman, Dr. Rudolf Steiner, was followed by the following opening speech, the essential content of which is reproduced here:

"My dear Theosophical friends!

Just as I was able to point out at last year's general assembly that we are entering the seventh year of the existence of our German Section, we can say at the opening of this year's assembly that we have now completed the seventh year of our existence as the German Section. On this occasion, it may be assumed from the outset that the Theosophists have a feeling for what is called the cyclical development of events. Accordingly, our gathering today, after the first seven-year cycle has ended, signifies a special kind of celebration and consecration. On such an occasion, it may perhaps happen that not only what you may take for granted, namely that you are warmly welcomed by the Secretary General, but it is probably appropriate at the end of our seventh year to point out many other things. Truly, such a seven-year cycle, as it has just expired, can teach us many things. It will therefore not be superfluous to take this opportunity to point out some of the lessons that events have taught us.

Those of you who have participated in the Theosophical life in our German Section in various places will have noticed that this life has undergone an evolution and experienced a transformation. Those who can do so, through their long membership, may remember the way we started the Theosophical Society here in Germany seven years ago. Those who have followed different lecture cycles and have drawn comparisons between how we could speak in the last cycles and how we had to speak at the beginning of the movement will notice a big difference. It was necessary to ascend gradually from the contemplation of lower spheres of knowledge to higher ones. Years ago, one had to speak more abstractly and schematically than is the case now. The rudiments of theosophy had to be presented in such a way that everyone could understand them. Now, however, we can also acquire such intimate teachings as those presented to us in Munich or Basel a few months ago. At the beginning of the movement, many members would have still regarded what was said there as wild fantasy. So there must have been a significant change, which everyone is able to notice. This is a thoroughly justified thing; because the theosophical movement would not progress if it could not grow not only in number but also in inner content. This fact must make it clear to us that the Theosophical movement is not something that is based on a dogmatic book or a doctrine that is available only once, but is something that, like an organism, is constantly adding new members. But we can also look back on a certain fertility of the movement. What can be said about this can be seen from certain figures that relate to our working conditions. I have noted the number of members who do direct work, through lectures and so on, and this number has risen to twenty, and that includes only those members who are already expanding their activities to different locations. In addition to this, there is the extensive and important work in the individual lodges. Hardly any of the twenty collaborators was already active through oral lectures seven years ago. This shows that we have achieved something, that the Theosophical movement has been fruitful since its inception. But this has also happened in many other directions. For example, we have been able to expand our activities by setting up the so-called art halls. Mr. Wagner will probably tell us something about this new institution, as far as it concerns Berlin. These events are intended to present art imbued with theosophical ideas to people who are still distant from theosophy. Myths and legends are told, and those who come from the small life of everyday life are given a brief outline of the theosophical teachings in the most popular form, and so on. Without doubt, this kind of laborious, spiritual work can be imitated and further developed. It is very gratifying when ordinary people come in from the street to absorb the basic principles of Theosophy with joy. This is also a proper way of spreading the theosophical work, but it must be done in a thoroughly unpretentious way. If it were done in a pretentious way, it would not be fruitful. But as it is, it is a truly practical institution. The point is that what is to be done in the spirit of the present really does happen.

Finally, it was also possible to realize an intention in which one can really feel the essence of what lies in a seven-year cycle. Seven years ago, I gave a lecture in Berlin about Schur's drama The Children of Lucifer. At that time the idea of a later performance was already in the background of this lecture. Now, in the seventh year of our existence, this idea could be realized in Munich. Thus, after seven years, a movement like the theosophical one returns to its beginning, as it were. Then, under certain circumstances, what had once been conceived as a mere intention can be realized. But it takes patience to allow such intentions to mature. It would have been premature to realize the idea of a performance of the aforementioned drama before now. These are the kinds of things that must pass through our souls when we experience the sacred moment of the completion of a seven-year cycle. These are, of course, only the bright sides of development, from which we can learn that, if they really prove to be bright sides, they should be continued in a calm manner. But much more can be learned from the dark sides. The growth in the number of members of the Society is very easily associated with a misunderstanding of the innermost nerve of the forces that are to play within the movement. The members themselves have the necessary task of ensuring that misunderstandings do not arise too strongly within the Theosophical Society, and that, on the other hand, the spiritual research is exposed to as few misunderstandings as possible in the world. We truly have a sacred spiritual treasure to guard, which can very easily be misunderstood; the symptoms of such misunderstandings are evident everywhere. For example, an article appeared recently in a Berlin morning newspaper that must have seemed extremely boring and banal to the true Theosophist, in which occultism is presented as encompassing areas such as somnambulism, clairvoyance, thought transfer and so on. The writer of this article is indeed a famous man within the journalistic world, but basically he knows as little about occultism as a bookbinder knows about the content of the books he binds. But that man had to speak as one would speak when considering what is today called Theosophy or occultism in public. The task of the Theosophical movement is to appeal, in the first instance, not to ill-informed humanity, but to the better-informed human heart and human reason. But to do that, the theosophist must gradually acquire the right tact. The man who wrote the article said that he had met a nanny in a family who took the children to the zoo every day and occasionally met a lady there who began telling her about the nature and significance of the astral body, and eventually convinced this servant girl completely. I would not dream of believing that this could happen to a member of the Theosophical Society, for Theosophists are gradually acquiring a sense of tact in such matters. It is also completely improper to propagandize for Theosophy in this way; anyone who does so will cause the most intense harm to the Theosophical movement. It is a different matter if Theosophy is systematically introduced to people like the housemaid in the sitting room. If a naive person is presented with Theosophical facts in such a fragmentary way, it will only confuse him; it may even do great harm to his soul.

This also leads us to speak in an even more serious way about a point that is already important today, but will become even more so in the future. We will also learn a great deal from this! This point concerns the relationship between those who teach and work within society and those who want to learn. We are in a difficult place here. It can easily happen that precisely through such a movement, what is called blind faith, faith based on mere authority, gets out of hand. It is in this direction that sins take the greatest revenge. Let us take this opportunity to refer to a saying of Lessing. He found that all the people around him sang the highest praises of Klopstock. But when he delved into what people really knew about Klopstock, it turned out that they had hardly read him. In Theosophy, understanding is the only thing that matters. Those who want to understand within this from the very source of spiritual life will probably grasp Lessing's word, somewhat modified: “We want to be praised less, but understood more diligently.” This saying should be deeply engraved in our hearts as a salutary lesson that has emerged in recent years. We have seen how a truly estimable teacher in the theosophical field has received undivided praise; but we have also had to experience how a fierce opposition to her has gradually emerged, admittedly outside the German Section. If one were to examine the matter, one would find that the following applies here: There were many who in the past admired and marveled at the leading personality of the Theosophical Society. If these admirers had more often written in their hearts: We want to understand less than admire, the subsequent opposition would not have asserted itself. It is not outward worship and admiration that we should show to the Teachers, but we should strive for their understanding. Those who are well versed in true occultism know how pernicious uncomprehending admiration can be. They will say to themselves: if someone makes an effort not just to admire and venerate a personality, but to make that personality's cause their own, and to embrace that cause not just for the sake of the personality it represents, but for its own sake, then they are on the right path. Mere personal admiration can easily turn into its opposite. This is where the true reasons for the change of so many attitudes within the Theosophical movement to their opposite are to be found. You would do better to always listen to the words of those who are truly working in the spirit of our movement, then it will also become clear to you that they actually want to be understood rather than admired. But there is an even more serious side to this! Those who begin to hear the teachings of Theosophy from this or that source are not immediately able to understand everything. This understanding does not require clairvoyance, but rather the mere application of sound reason. Only those who have the will to do so, who apply their reason to the matter, will understand. Nothing has been said on my part, no matter how lofty the heights of spiritual science it may come from, that cannot be grasped or at least examined with reason, if it is applied in an all-round and unbiased enough manner. We must realize that not everyone can be a spiritual scientist, but what has been communicated must in all cases be able to be tested in a reasonable way. Admittedly, certain things often make such a test difficult, for example the high truths of the Gospel of Luke; but even here we can see an example of how it can be done. First of all, what has been investigated by the clairvoyant is taken as a mere communication. This information, without any documentary evidence, is then checked against the available documents, in our case the Gospel of Luke, because the writer of this gospel has said the same thing in his own way as is revealed by the direct research. This is only an approximate verification for the time being, but with simpler things it can become more accurate. Thus we will see that over time the testimonies will multiply. The doctrine of reincarnation and karma should be proved in life; for only in this way can we properly introduce it to a larger public. When the reproach is made that what the spiritual researcher says cannot be accepted otherwise than on mere authority, such a principle is quite wrong, and one should not let it arise at all, but rather say to oneself: I will gather up all my reason and test what is communicated with it in life. So, for example, we should go and study what has been said about Zarathustra, what is given to us by spiritual research as broad guidelines, and compare it with what history and life have to say about it. I am quite calm with those who really take the whole of history to verify what has been said. Newly discovered facts can only provide new evidence. Even what was said yesterday as a brief sketch about anthroposophy can only be confirmed by physiology, biology and so on. The more one uses such sciences in the right way, the stronger the evidence will be. Apparent contradictions should be resolved, for they are only contradictions if the investigation is inaccurate. This principle has been particularly adhered to in my forthcoming book, Occult Science.

Nothing is more harmful than when a teacher is shown unfounded admiration. The blind believer does himself harm by not developing; but even more harm does he do to the one in whom he blindly believes, whom he blindly admires. Everything that is shown as blind admiration for the spiritual researcher takes itself out like a drag shoe for the spiritual researcher, whereas the teacher has to fight against it in the most terrible way. There is nothing he has to fight against more than precisely such blind admiration, through which stones are literally thrown in his way. This should be entrusted to you as a secret after the seventh year! Those who want to test you are willing students with whom you can make progress. The others, however, constantly throw obstacles in your way, which you have to defend yourself against.

They can only be overcome if the teacher is absolutely honest. Blind admiration is the most dangerous pitfall in Theosophy. The theosophist must educate himself to be honest and strict with himself. Such things must be considered very seriously. The teachers must, of course, to some extent accept what has been characterized here, for they are able to examine everything that is brought to them. Personal followers will always exist; but they should not affect the teacher at all. He must strengthen himself against them. Blind followers are his tempters and seducers.

This way of thinking must gradually become a guiding principle in the Theosophical Society. We must come to the conviction that we are representing a sacred cause. Only under this principle will we make progress. No one need be deterred from wanting to teach on a larger or smaller scale if such a principle is recognized by them.

This is something we should learn from our great experiences. On the one hand, we should be impartial and unprejudiced people; on the other hand, however, we should exercise the utmost care in absorbing what is given to us. The past seven years have taught us this.

This is not to say, however, that everyone should hold back from teaching until they have verified something themselves. We must always make a strict distinction between what can be grasped through reason alone, and what can only be grasped later through further development. It is bad when we simply accept things on the basis of authority for the sake of convenience. Why do so many mediums become frauds? They are not solely to blame for this, but so are the blind listeners and believers. One thing is indispensable for anyone who studies occult phenomena, namely, a constantly deepening inwardness of one's own self. The more blind faith, which arises only from convenience, is hurled at a medium, for example, the more likely it is that the medium will become a fraud. It cannot be emphasized enough

strongly enough emphasize how important it is in this field to set the right path as an ideal."

With this the chairman concluded his opening speech and then gave a short summary of the external work of the past few years, his various visits to lodges, his various travels, especially to Austria. On this occasion, he mentioned a beautiful experience that is particularly symptomatic of the character of the theosophical movement. He recalled a public lecture in Prague, where members of both the Czech and German nationalities were present and sat together in the most wonderful harmony. At the end, an old gentleman told the lecturer that what Theosophy had achieved here would otherwise have been impossible in Prague. But Theosophy was able to unite those who were otherwise hostile to each other so harmoniously on that beautiful evening.

The journey then continued via Vienna to Klagenfurt. In Vienna, too, the work proceeded in the most peaceful manner. And that was in the days when the Italian and German students were fighting, with shots being fired; it was also the time when the fierce disputes between Germans and Czechs were taking place. From this it can be seen that Theosophy has a mission, namely to bring harmony, peace and unity to people. Through Theosophy, such a thing can be achieved.

Then reference was made to the remarkable fact that seven lecture cycles have taken place in the past year: In Rome, Düsseldorf, Kristiania, Budapest, Kassel, Munich and Basel. Furthermore, those members who have repeatedly worked in a wide variety of places were gratefully remembered; but the many others, whose names cannot all be mentioned, may accept as thanks the success that their work has had within the Theosophical Society, and draw from it inspiration for further hard work. The chairman also emphasized the Budapest Congress as an important external event and mentioned that at this congress he was awarded the Grand Subba Row Medal by the Adyar headquarters for the book “How to Know Higher Worlds”, which was available in English translation. This is a sign that there can also be harmony between the various teachers of Theosophy when independence prevails. Besant and Steiner are apparently getting along quite well, even though they are going different ways. It was necessary to unite the old stream of the Theosophical movement with a new current, to bring in new life blood from a certain direction. Nothing fruitful will come from empty talk of harmony. Those who are there as teachers are working together on the one great work, each in his own way.

The founding of a “Philosophical-Theosophical Publishing House” was also mentioned, which is under the direction of Miss Mücke and in which an outline of anthroposophy is also to appear from time to time.

In a very solemn manner, the Secretary General then named those of our dear members who had left the physical plane during the year, and in each case gave a brief description of the deceased's relationship to Theosophy, especially the three ladies from Stuttgart who had passed away, Mrs. Lina Schwarz, Mrs. Cohen and Mrs. Aldinger.

“Even in such a case,” the chairman continued, “we can place ourselves in the soul of the deceased, in particular, to understand the importance of what Theosophy can offer us. We do not want to try to console the bereaved of our dear friends who have passed away with banal phrases, but we want to point out that although we are only at the beginning of our movement, the overall karma of it must gradually come to that which should be achieved in the individual karma. Theosophists must ultimately feel obliged to actively support each other in certain cases. In this way the popular phrase of general philanthropy is replaced by a true understanding of individual real love for one's neighbor. If philanthropy does not address individual cases and become active there, it remains a mere phrase. Such thoughts must arise in us when we see from time to time this or that of our dear members leave the physical plan."

After these words of the Chairman, Mr. Bedrnicek from Prague took the floor on behalf of the Prague Section to express his warmest thanks to the Secretary General for his efforts on behalf of the Prague Lodge before the General Assembly.

Mr. Günther Wagner, on behalf of the Besant branch, proposed that the reading of the minutes of the last General Assembly be dispensed with, since anyone could have sufficiently informed themselves about their content in the printed “Mitteilungen”. The motion that the minutes of the last General Assembly not be read was unanimously approved, and the minutes were declared approved.

A report on membership trends is given by Miss von Sivers, according to the most recent lists:

“The number of members is 1500 compared to 1150 last year; 415 have joined compared to 336 last year; 30 have left or can no longer be found and have therefore been deleted; 29 have transferred to other sections and six have died.”

The current number of branches is 44, compared to 37 in the previous year, and one center. Seven newly established branches can be named: the Wroclaw branch, the Cusanus branch in Koblenz, the Essen branch; the Paulus branch in Mulhouse; the Novalis branch in Strasbourg; the Dante branch in Dresden; the Goethe branch in Munich.

Mr. Seiler presents the cash report with the annual accounts and balance sheet:  
According to this, the total income was 5817.69 marks  
and the total expenditure was 5499.53 marks  
. This leaves a surplus of 318.16 marks  
, to which bank deposits of 2020.45 marks  
338 Marks, which results in total assets of 2676.61 Marks.

Following on from this, Mr. Ahner from Dresden proposed that a more detailed cash report be published in the “Mitteilungen” in the future, so that outsiders could also gain a more precise insight into income and expenditure.

Mr. Werner proposed that this motion be rejected outright.

Mr. Elkan proposed closing the debate, which was accepted.

The previous motion to publish a more detailed cash report in the “Mitteilungen” was rejected by an overwhelming majority. The report of the cash auditors, Mr. Tessmar and Ms. Motzkus, was then read out. Mr. Tessmar explained that the cash books had been checked in three ways: firstly, in terms of external cleanliness and clarity; secondly, in terms of the arithmetic; and thirdly, in terms of the accuracy of the individual entries. The result of this was that the two auditors were able to report that the cash management was entirely proper. The financial statements also match the accounting records, and the positive cash balance is also factual.

Now the proposals from the plenary session were discussed. No written proposals had been submitted to the chairman.

Pastor Wendt asks for the floor and proposes that the “announcements” occasionally sent to members should no longer be sent in an open cross-band, but in a sealed envelope.

Ms. von Sivers replies that this would cause a huge increase in postage costs. It would be better for individual members to ensure that, through their own carelessness, information does not fall into the wrong hands.

Mr. Ahner suggests sending the various communications as a postal package to the individual board members and having them distribute them.

Mr. Pastor Wendt then withdraws his proposal in favor of this second one.

Mr. van Leer suggests that another type of cruciate ligament might be used.

The chairman now points out that voting is only possible on motions that are compatible with the statutes; however, since the statutes state that the lodges are autonomous, the General Assembly cannot decide what the individual lodges should do. It would have been best, the chairman continues, to have kept the original mode; where everything was sent to the members in sealed envelopes, but the financial aspect made the change necessary due to the rapid growth of the society. “Besides,” he says, “we are not doing anything that should be kept secret, and it is not a big deal if a postman occasionally reads such a message.” Pastor Wendt had based his proposal on such an actual case.

Pastor Wendt proposes to increase membership fees to cover the additional postage costs; but the chairman also replies that the general assembly does not have a quorum to decide on this in accordance with the statutes. This matter was thus settled.

Mr. Oscar Grosheintz proposes to create an address book of all members of the German section, to be sent to the boards of the lodges, if not to all individual members, in order to improve contact among members.

Fräulein von Sivers replies that on a previous occasion it had been decided, for various reasons, to no longer include the names of those entering the “Mitteilungen”.

Mr. Ahner believes that a list of exact addresses would be useful after all, and particularly important for the lodge boards, because it would in every way facilitate communication among the members.

Fräulein von Sivers points out the dangers associated with the creation of such address material, which could then be used for any other purpose. Besides, she says, members could, if they visit a place where there is a Theosophical branch, turn to the local chairman in question.

Dr. Steiner explained that this would be a matter of principle, which, in addition to its advantages, would also have a downside, since there are people who work honestly within the Theosophical Society but who, due to their position or other circumstances, cannot go public with their name as Theosophists.

Such important matters should be left to the well-founded discretion of the leadership of the Section. The Chairman pointed out further problems that would arise from publicly disclosing the addresses of members. He also did not feel called upon to reveal the names of members, as these were sacred to him. After Mr. Ahner had again taken the floor on the same matter, Mr. Kiem finally moved to end the debate, which was accepted.

The previous motion to forward the names and addresses of all members of the German Section to the lodge committees was rejected by a large majority.

No further motions were put forward by the plenary assembly.

The representatives of the branches then reported: Apart from Fräulein von Sivers, who read a report from the Karlsruhe branch on behalf of this lodge, no one wished to speak on this matter.

Mr. Günther Wagner then gave a brief report on the work in the Berlin art room and followed it up with a general consideration of the usefulness of such events within the Theosophical movement. He also encouraged similar attempts to be made elsewhere, as has already happened in Berlin and Munich.

No one requested the floor under the item “Miscellaneous”.

The eighth general assembly of the German Section was declared closed by the chair.