# 69. Some remarks on the essay by Helene von Schewitsch, “The Secret Doctrine and the Animal Men in Modern Science”

It is understandable that the arguments of this essay should give rise to the misgivings of many readers of the journal Luzifer-Gnosis. Indeed, the editor has often heard the opinion expressed that such arguments have no place in this journal. Such views, it has been said, are the product only of a fantasy that is incompatible with the purity of mind necessary for an elevation to spiritual life. I can understand all these opinions very well, and yet it seemed to me not only permissible but even necessary to present the comments of the esteemed author on the writings of *Lanz-Liebenfels* to the readers. I have not hidden from the author that I will openly express my opinion on the matter after publication. Today it shall be only a short one, because the space does not allow more; but in the next issue, I will deal with those questions from a secret-scientific point of view, to which the essay urges.

It seemed necessary to me to print this because Lanz-Liebenfels' explanations are a prime example of what happens when someone with a materialistic attitude approaches things of this kind. Lanz-Liebenfels is by no means the only one who thinks along such lines; what he says is only a radical example of a direction to which the present attitude tends all too easily. Everywhere one encounters the endeavor to bring human conditions as close as possible to animal instincts. People take pleasure in pushing this animalism into the foreground in all human considerations. Anyone who looks more deeply into these things will easily recognize that in an age in which natural science is as materialistic as it is in the present, there is a danger of going so far down the path that certain facts of human history are seen in a light that stems from a confluence of humanity with animality.

It is not possible to discuss LanzLiebenfels' research here. The only thing that can be done is to *characterize* it from the point of view of spiritual research. In the essay mentioned above, LanzLiebenfels quite rightly says in the text on which it is based: “The scientific writings of the ancients are written in a secret language and contain absolutely no contradictions or fables.” This is literally true; but for that very reason, in order to judge correctly about these writings, one must possess the key to this secret language. And this key can be attained only through a real knowledge of the secret science. And no one who possesses this key is still able to believe that the ancients really spoke of a physical animal man when they gave certain people animal names. They still had a real insight into the higher bodies of man. The astral body of man was given to them in experience. They knew that the physical body rests in an astral cloud, which is an expression of the drives, instincts, passions, etc. of the human being. And they saw how this mobile astral body is constantly changing, adapting to both a higher and a lower soul life. Just as the human being, the animal also has an astral body. It may be said that the human astral body rises higher in form, color, movement, etc. than the animal astral body, the more man ennobles his instincts and passions. But the less this happens, the more similar the human astral body appears to some animal astral body. The ancients simply based their descriptions and illustrations not on the physical human body, but on the astral body. In certain cases they did not want to depict the physical body at all, but to create a symbol for the astral body. When they spoke of peoples who were completely dominated by lower instincts, they indicated this by giving the people the animal name that corresponded to the nature of their astral body. If they called a person a “long-tailed monkey,” they meant nothing more than that his astral body appeared to them to resemble that of a long-tailed monkey. Thus it could also happen that “sober historical tribute lists” state that a king received “pagutu,” “baziati” and “udumi,” i.e., various types of animal people, from the land of Musri. Why should these not be mentioned alongside elephants, horses, camels, etc., which is declared to be quite impossible on page 559 (of issue 30 of Lucifer-Gnosis)? In terms of their physical body, these people did not resemble animals; such a description was based solely on their astral body.

The messages of the ancients can be understood with this key of esoteric science. Consider, for example, what is said in the essay “The Stages of Higher Knowledge” in this very issue. Those who attain vision of the astral world first see their own drives, desires and passions as an astral dream; and they appear to them like animals or demons that are outside of them. How clearly this makes a passage that Liebenfels, for example, cites from the Talmud: “All animals are good in *a dream*, except for the monkey and the guenon.” That such is said of these animals in particular is, of course, related to certain views of a certain time. From what has been said, it can be seen what the result is of applying to the physical world what in a description of the ancient world refers to the astral world. Given such a premise, what becomes of the assertion that, for example, a person belonging to a people with already refined instincts has engaged in sexual intercourse with a companion from a still inferior people? From this latter man a physical animal is made. Once this point has been clarified, there is really no need to go into the rest. For all the other grotesque interpretations are based on a similar lack of knowledge of the true key to the old “secret language”.

It will always be dangerous if the descriptions of the higher worlds fall into the hands of people who only want to know the physical world and therefore interpret all *spiritual* truths in a grossly sensual way. This danger is a reality for the “children of our age”. And the readers of the essay in question, who have become concerned, can still be given quite edifying things to hear and read. For we are still far from having reached the zenith of materialism. As a characteristic example of what this materialism leads to, something like this had to be printed here sometime. What occult science has to say about such things has been said in this journal and will often be said again. No reader of this journal can therefore really be misled by explanations such as those characterized. But anyone who is interested in occult matters should know that the materialistic interpretation of certain facts is relatively harmless when it is based on knowledge of physical science, but that it must become positively outrageous when someone has heard of higher things and enters into the materialistic channel with them.

The dangers to which this refers cannot be avoided in this day and age, since certain parts of occult science are now available in print. In an article that will soon appear, entitled “Secret Doctrine and Freemasonry, as well as related directions”, I will point out certain aberrations to which the public nature of our lives must necessarily lead. But the right relationship to these things is gained only through knowledge of them, and by no means through ignorance. That is why the article appears in this journal. I do not wish to discuss today what is said in it about the mysteries of the grotesque, for this will be discussed in the article just mentioned. The reader may also inform himself about two other errors from the explanations that will soon be contained in Lucifer-Gnosis, namely, the incorrect statement that in the course of human embodiments seven male and seven female should alternate. In reality, as a rule (although there are exceptions), a male is always followed by a female and so on. Nor is this true of the much-discussed double sexuality in the present human epoch. For this is nothing more than a regrettable *relapse* into ancient stages of human development.