From a Fateful Time
GA 64 — 26 February 1915, Berlin
8. What is Mortal in Man?
I would like to address the question of the mortal and the immortal in man in two reflections, of which this evening, the first, is to be devoted mainly to man's mortality, and next week's second lecture will deal with man's immortal essence. We live in a time in which materialism, even though it is now more or less in decline, has nevertheless taken hold in wide circles. And even if one wants to deceive oneself about this fact by the fact that the word materialism is often frowned upon, the way of thinking and attitude, the nuance of world view, is nevertheless in a state of continuous increase, which must be correctly designated by the word materialism.
Now materialism has a very, very simple answer to the question “What is mortal about the human being?” It has the answer: everything about the human being is mortal. One need only refer to the bible of the newer materialistic times, to David Friedrich Strauß' “Old and New Belief”, to substantiate this. It is true that David Friedrich Strauß's “The Old and the New Faith” is no longer read to the same extent as it was a few decades ago. But this is not so much because people have withdrawn from the innermost impulses that dominate David Friedrich Strauß's materialism, but rather because in our fast-moving times a book is hardly able to survive for a few decades.
We can and must ask ourselves the question in view of everything that has come to light and been discussed within today's materialistic world view: Can materialism provide any answers to man's legitimate spiritual questions, or can materialism provide proof that the questions that a spiritual scientific world view must raise are unjustified, that they, so to speak, refer to nothing? If one, esteemed attendees, is aware of how deeply rooted the materialistic world view is in what many people today consider to be the only truly scientific view, then one must raise these questions with particular intensity. For within today's science, or rather within the view that results from today's science for many, there are strong impulses that take a stand against the science of the spirit. In today's science there are many instruments of power that can be brought into play against many of the objections that one or the other side may have to the materialistic world view. Anyone who can really see what has emerged from the so-called scientific world view, which claims to be based solely on true and real facts, must say to themselves: Only then can a spiritual-scientific world can be developed that is able to meet the demands of modern natural science, if it is able to deal with this natural science in such a way that this natural science comes into its own.
It must be fully admitted that natural science can easily deal with the objections that are still being raised from many sides today; at least insofar as it can easily penetrate with its arguments against the immortality of the human soul in those who, from the outset, have an inclination to deny the free activity of the spirit, independently of the material.
It has often been emphasized that spiritual science seeks to engage with the spiritual cultural process of our time, and it seeks to do so on the basis of – it may well be said – a complete transformation, a complete renewal of people's habitual ways of thinking and imagining. Precisely for this reason, because spiritual science must appeal to something that is unknown in the broadest circles today, really unknown, even in those circles that usually oppose it, that is why it is so difficult to make this spiritual science of the time formation really somewhat understandable.
Spiritual science differs fundamentally from what is usually called a philosophical way of thinking today. Philosophical thinking, which seeks above all to arrive at its results through considerations of reason, through mere combinations of concepts, through conclusions and the like, — philosophical thinking, as it is often understood today, is not capable of grasping that in human nature which really passes through the gate of death, which is truly capable of living independently of corporeality, of physicality.
For spiritual science, however, this purely philosophical approach, based on concepts and ideas of the external world, is from the outset something — forgive the somewhat trivial comparison — it is this philosophy, based purely on rational arguments, as one often says, is something that can just as little arrive at real results about the spiritual life, just as little get the spirit into human knowledge, as man can nourish himself by eating himself. Just as the process of nutrition must take hold of something that is outside its structure if it is to serve the human or animal organism, so human cognition must take hold of something that lies outside the mere connection and concatenation of concepts and ideas if the true cognitive needs of the human being are to be satisfied. In the second half of the nineteenth century, we have an example of how materialism, in its strict logic, is able to proceed from conclusion to conclusion, but because it is unable to really engage with a spiritual reality, it nevertheless becomes entangled in contradictions, which are not noticed by this materialistic world. conclusion to conclusion, but because it is impossible for it to really engage with a spiritual reality, it nevertheless becomes entangled in contradictions, which are not noticed by this materialistic world view itself, but which are noticed by those who have trained themselves to a certain universality of thought. In his book 'Old and New Faith', David Friedrich Strauß also presents Goethe's idea of immortality among the various proofs of human immortality that he wants to refute. He takes up this idea and behaves very strangely in doing so. David Friedrich Strauß does admit that there is something heroic about Goethe's idea of immortality, but then he belittles this heroism – one would like to use the word that Nietzsche coined for David Friedrich Strauß – like a real philistine. Goethe made not one but many statements about human immortality. For Strauß, only the one that I will mention now comes into consideration.
The thought occurs to Goethe that when the human soul tries to grasp itself, it becomes aware within itself of having abilities and talents that it cannot fully develop and unfold in one human life; and now, from the depths of his being and at the same time from what I yesterday called “the sustaining power of the German spirit,” the word comes forth: If nature has given me such aptitudes that cannot be satisfied in this life, then it is obliged to assign me another life after death, where these various aptitudes can really come to fruition.
Now, first of all, Strauss makes a kind of joke, as it were, by saying: Perhaps nature is indeed obliged to do so; but who can tell us that nature will keep this obligation? But he objects to something else as well. He says: Does not the whole of natural science contradict the view that all the tendencies that appear within the series of nature's beings are actually developed? Could it not be that tendencies develop in human nature that do not reach ultimate perfection, that do not come to fruition? And now it certainly looks very logical when David Friedrich Strauß says: that not all tendencies come to development, that can be seen very clearly in the germs of fish, how thousands of fish-germs arise and how few of them develop. But it can be clear to anyone who has once walked across fields or through gardens and has seen how many apples have fallen and decayed without coming to their development.
Now one can say: that is all certainly correct and it looks as if it could be convincing. But then, if one forms one's thinking somewhat more universally, the objection arises: yes, do all apples perish? Do they all fall from the tree before they are developed? Or do no fish germs come to fruition at all? Does not nature itself show that it is fundamentally concerned with the actual final development of all germs? If man then notices in himself that there are certain tendencies in him that do not come to fruition within his lifetime, then, according to Strauß's logic, the development of such tendencies in every human being should not be achieved. But life does not show us that at all. But David Friedrich Strauß shows us that he cannot think things through to the end. However, that is not enough for him, so he finds something else. You don't even have to read between the lines, it's pretty bluntly stated, and I will just translate it into slightly different words. David Friedrich Strauß says something like this: Basically, Goethe's saying is not even correct. Because if you look at old Goethe, you can clearly see that Goethe was actually able to develop all his abilities. Then he points out to us that, if you look at it properly, every person will actually find that their abilities are being developed. If Strauss had been just a little more modest, he might have realized that perhaps Goethe was more justified in speaking of the unfinished potential in human nature, which is only seeking to develop, than Strauss was.
Thus we can see from this example – and hundreds and thousands of such examples could be cited – how, as it were, a general course of mere philosophical speculation, even if it has a materialistic coloring, does not come to anything other than that it runs into an easily refutable contradiction that destroys itself before the universally observing soul.
If one asks oneself how it is that people have such a difficult time talking about the immortal part of their soul, the answer must be: between birth and death, people do live entirely in what is mortal in them, what is transitory in their nature, as we shall see in a moment. And one would like to say: only quietly and intimately does that which is immortal in the human being come to light, does the immortal part come to light. Indeed, one can say that this immortal element appears so quietly and intimately that in ordinary life the human soul does not have enough strength, enough endurance, but above all, does not have enough attention developed in a higher sense to observe what is quietly and intimately announcing itself in it as the immortal.
When we observe the human soul in its life and how it expresses itself, we encounter it, so to speak, in three ways of expression: as a thinking soul, as a feeling soul, and as a willing soul. Now, as has often been discussed in these lectures, the path of spiritual science into the spiritual worlds consists in bringing forth the powers lying in the depths of the soul in order to develop thinking, feeling and willing to a high level, to a sharper and more intense than those in which they usually are, so that through this training, through this activity, they can become organs that not only enable the human being to grasp the physical, but also enable him to grasp the spiritual that is all around us. Now, however, the usual consideration, which seeks to become clear about the mortal and the immortal in the human being, usually assumes that it is considering this mortal and immortal part of the soul and now asks itself: Is there anything to be found in this thinking, feeling and willing that betrays that the human being is able to carry something over from the mortal into the immortal?
Here I must take up what I said in one of my lectures this winter about the development of the human faculties for spiritual scientific research, in order to show how it is possible to find, and not find, in thinking, feeling and willing that which distinguishes the mortal in man from the immortal. One of the paths into the spiritual world that has often been mentioned here is that which is called the concentration of thought life, of thinking. I will only briefly point out what this concentration consists of and what it leads to. If we place some thought, preferably one that we have formed ourselves, not one that the external world stimulates in us, if we place such a thought formed by ourselves into the horizon of our consciousness, if we forget everything that lives around us and otherwise in us, and become only one with this one thought, when we can live completely in this one thought for a certain time, then we can throw all the soul forces that we would otherwise apply to the entire activity of the human being onto this one thought, then it is made stronger and stronger; then our whole being flows together with this thought, we concentrate on this thought. This experience occurs as a result of spiritual-scientific experience, but it is brought about by not growing tired of repeatedly and repeatedly placing a thought at the center of one's consciousness and identifying completely with it. For one must often apply this inner energy and perseverance, this concentrated attention to a thought for years. Even if one says, as a precaution, that one must not overdo this, a short time must still be devoted daily to such practice. But once one has devoted oneself to such practice, depending on one's abilities, depending on the structure of the soul after the experience of the human being, one gains a certain experience, one enters into a certain experience. Up to a certain point this inwardly concentrated thought intensifies; it becomes ever brighter and brighter; the one thought takes hold of us more and more, absorbs us more and more, and we feel, as we are concentrating, that we can forget the world, we feel more and more and more within this thought. But just when we feel strong in this thought, we feel at the same time how this thought, as it were, disappears from us, and how with this thought the power to apply our thinking in this way, as it were, dies away. We feel with this thought as if the thought and with it we ourselves were taken up by powers that live around us; as if our thinking darkened from a certain moment on. All this must, of course, remain a purely spiritual process, only then is it a healthy process. Today is not the time to mention that all the objections raised by pathology and psychopathology are quite wrong when they say that in this way the human being would work himself into illusions and self-suggestions, that he must arrive at ideas that are pathological in nature. One has only to read the relevant chapters of my book “How to Know Higher Worlds” to see that the path described here is precisely the healthiest path for the soul, provided it is followed correctly. When the moment has come, one feels how a spiritual power that surrounds us, as it were, snatches the thought from us and allows it to die away in us; one then feels what the soul must go through in order to find the way into the spiritual. One feels as if one were losing one's spiritual footing, and this too has already been hinted at here. One feels as if one had in a certain way become acquainted with the Nothing. And a state can easily overtake a person that can be compared to a boundless fear. But it is precisely such a state that is suitable for bringing certain powers out of the soul that would otherwise remain undeveloped in man. For in overcoming such conditions, which I have now compared to fear, and many others that are part of the experiences of the spiritual researcher, deep powers of the soul that would otherwise remain undeveloped are unfolded, and therein lies that strengthening of the inner life of the soul, through which alone man can find his way into the spiritual worlds.
When one has gone through an experience such as that indicated here, one has yet another feeling. And all these experiences, which lead to one's actual entry into the spiritual world, are of an intimate nature, are fine, quiet processes of the human soul. When one has come to the point indicated, one feels as if that which one has hitherto addressed as the human faculty of thought, that which thinks in us, that which has the power to think, — as if that were to go out of us and go to the world, as if one were to lose it for the time being and as if one were to be transported with it into the objective world. One must have such experiences; one must have them in such a way that one really comes to know them in their reality, in their reality for the human being, otherwise one cannot speak about them in a true sense. But so that the human being does not remain stuck with this experience, as if only what had previously lived in him as thought had been snatched from him and he had been carried out into the world with this thought, so that he does not remain stuck with this experience - because this process of knowledge would simply leave him falling into a nothing - another must come to it. I have often described it here under the name meditation.
Meditation has also been hinted at here – meditation on something that we usually speak of as being outside of man, but which, if we look at the individual human life, we can see how intimately it is connected with man. When we look at what we have gone through in this life between birth and our present point in life and what we summarize as our destiny, then we are accustomed to saying: this or that stroke of fate has hit us here or there. But on closer reflection, it can show up even for ordinary life how one-sided such a saying is. If you ask yourself: What are you today? What can you do today? What abilities does your soul possess? — then we have to look at what we have gone through. We usually do not look for the context; but if we do, it enlightens us about what we actually are at the present moment. It enlightens us about how we would not have these or those abilities if we had not been struck by this or that stroke of fate, this or that twist of fate, twenty or thirty years ago or more, and guided us to acquire these abilities. But if we did not have them, our self would be something quite different in the concrete. We do, after all, consist of our abilities, our powers. But these are brought to us through our destiny. If you think this thought through to the end, you say to yourself: We are much more intimately connected with our destiny than is usually believed. We grow into our destiny with our innermost being, with our I. And we finally come to the thought: Basically, your self has become you through the fact that these or those strokes of fate, good or bad, have happened to you; but you have become you out of them. That which you are now lay in your destiny. Our self goes out of us, goes into our destiny. When we really learn to feel through what we usually call destiny in this way, when we really connect with it completely, we come to extend not our thinking but our will to our entire destiny and say to ourselves: If you want to know yourself as you are now, you have to develop your will. In relation to your entire destiny, you must say to yourself: You are what you are now because your ego has become what it is now. We are fully immersed in destiny. That is to say, we understand that if we want ourselves now, we must want ourselves in our destiny; in other words, that it is I myself who, in destiny, rules, lives and exists.
We learn to say about what has happened to us in our destiny: we have done it to ourselves; we were in it in every single blow of our destiny. Man's will — and here again only experience can show us — becomes, by grasping his fate as being fully identical with his own nature, by will-ing his fate, is thereby greatly strengthened. Man's will, by becoming so strengthened, becomes that which, in a different way from what has been characterized in thinking, is now, as it were, detached from man as he stands before others. While we have driven thinking out of us through concentration, we succeed in such a strengthening of the will, as it has been described in the grasping of the fate thought, that we enter into something that lies outside of us, which, as we say, falls to us. We enter into something with our will that we otherwise ascribe to the outside world. When we steel our will in this way, strengthening and intensifying it, we then have a second spiritual experience. The intensifying of the will now in its turn becomes independent of our being and follows the thinking that has gone out of us. And so we are able to strengthen this thinking, which threatens to die due to the first experience, from the will.
What happens to the thinking that has become shadowy at a certain point and has almost ceased? It is filled with content, it acquires substance, in that we send the will after the thinking, in a sense send ourselves after the thinking with the second part of our being. When thinking and willing are thus removed from our being, then we come to achieve what today, however, can hardly be admitted for the contemporary world view — we come to be outside of that in which we otherwise live in the waking state. We have gone out ourselves with our thinking and willing; we stand really outside ourselves. And that in which we are otherwise always becomes for us an object, something that is outside of us, like the table or any object outside of the sensory body. We look back at the sensory body, at the life circumstances that this body has gone through. We look back at the spatial and temporal aspects of our human nature. We become acquainted with that in us which has separated itself from that which is mortal.
Thus the spiritual researcher answers the question: What is mortal in the human being? — so that he must say: That which remains when he unites the will, strengthened by this grasp of the facts of fate, with the thinking that has been dispersed in the universe through concentration of thought, and marries and feels outside of himself in his being thus grasped in spirit, beholds then that which is otherwise too quiet in us, the eternal, the immortal, is so greatly intensified that we experience it, we know ourselves in it, we know ourselves in it, but outside of our body. And only then do we begin to notice it. But we also begin to notice what ordinary thinking, feeling and willing, in short, the ordinary life of the soul actually is.
When we consider ordinary thinking, how it is stimulated by the external-sensual nature, how it proceeds bound to the process of our brain, then for someone who is able to look at the world spiritually in the sense just indicated, it is something that does not belong to our immortality at all, as it presents itself to us in the mortal body. You realize this when you stand outside of the mortal body in your true essence. Because then you realize: everything that this mortal, this physical body actually is – I would like to use a comparison that is not just a comparison, but that points to the truth – you recognize: this physical body is a mirror that is able to reflect that that a person in ordinary life knows nothing about, that he can only know when he, as it were, peels it out of the physical, that he only knows something when he stands in his immortal self opposite the body. He knows that the body is only a mirror and that thoughts have the same relationship to the body as the mirror images have to the observer. Just as if one had a number of mirrors on the wall and passed by the mirrors and saw one's own figure as long as one was there, but no longer saw oneself when one was not there and saw oneself again when one was there again, so man sees that of which he lives, but of which he knows nothing, when he is in the body and the body reflects its own nature back to him. And thoughts are present in the form in which we have them in ordinary life only as long as the mortal body reflects them. But something else is that which thinks; something else is that which exercises the immediate activity that reflects itself as a thought in the mortal body.
When examining human thinking, one cannot say that one can find anything in this thinking that could provide any insight into immortality, because these thoughts are reflections that are evoked by the mortal body. And that which is immortal is not standing in front of the mirror now, but is reflected in the thought forms. What is it that lives in front of the mirror, in our case in the mirror? Is there any way to express this at all in human words? Yes, there is a way. But what is to be expressed here at this point is not observed by man; for he is satisfied when he can take hold of his thoughts for orientation in the outer world, when he can live in his thoughts. That something lives in this thought, which one has to describe as the will within the thoughts, as the will that is active there, - man is usually not aware of this at all, or when he becomes aware of it, he draws a conclusion, as Schopenhauer did. Then he has no direct vision, then he does not grasp himself in this volitional thinking, in the thinking volition, in what he is, but in what this thinking volition gives him, namely in the thoughts, which are only mirror images. Only when man has brought about the marriage between thinking and willing as I have described it, only then are the soul powers so strong that all thinking appears permeated by a supersensible human entity, which is of a will-like nature, but in such a way that it shows its true, will-like nature, mirrored as thoughts. As truly as it is really our countenance when we see ourselves in the mirror, so truly do we mirror ourselves in our thoughts; but it is not what we are in this mirror image. That which we are is mirrored in such a way that we can never grasp in life, in strength, in thinking, what stands behind thinking and of which thinking is only a reflection. Just as the reflection lasts no longer than the time we stand before the mirror, so too this thinking in the material body lasts no longer than it is stimulated by the actual immortal in us, which is reflected in the thought.
Another thing becomes apparent to us in the ordinary process of willing, in the process by which we commit our actions, move our limbs. While we do not notice in thinking that what is essentially mirrored in it stands behind thinking, we do not notice in acting, in the actions we perform, that behind the human will there is something everywhere that is quite unlike our world of thoughts, quite unlike that which is mirrored in thoughts. The reason there has been so much controversy in philosophy about the freedom of the will is because man does not get to know the will as it really is. He only gets to know the power of the will, but not the living entity that is really inherent in the power. And in the will, the living entity is of a mental nature. You see, that which is the actual immortal in man is so quiet, so intimate, so hidden in the external sensual world that in the thought process the thought is hidden, that in the will process it is not even noticed that every smallest will process depends on what is reflected in the thought, but which cannot be noticed at all. One only notices this when one observes the course of fate in the manner described; when one strengthens the will so that it is united, standing outside us, outside mortal man, as I have described, with the thought. Then one notices how the will is united with the thought, then one notices the two sides, which always confront us separately in life as thought and will, united; for one has only brought them to marriage. One then lives in a thought-will process. But then one has only grasped that which goes beyond death, which goes through the gate of death. And then one realizes what mistake, what tremendous mistake those have made who have often thought about the immortality of the human soul in a purely philosophical way. Those who have thought about this immortality of the human soul have always wanted to hold on to something that is, after all, in a certain way similar to that which lives in sensuality or in sensual thinking. People have spoken of a substance of the soul, have searched for something that, like a fine materiality, passes through the gate of death. That one must grasp the eternal in man outside of the body and that one needs completely new concepts and ideas for this, which no external perception, no thinking bound to the brain, can give, will become clear to mankind through spiritual science. That, as it were, the immortal consists precisely in that which has nothing in common with the sensual, that is what will gradually have to be grasped.
Such things have always been sensed; scientifically substantiated from the present into the future, they will be. Schiller says:
Do not talk so much to me about nebulae and suns.
Is nature only great because it gives you things to count?
Your subject is the most exalted in space,
But, friends, the exalted does not dwell in space.
So he pointed out that one must go beyond the spatial in order to arrive at what is actually spiritual. Now, however, for the one who thinks in materialistic terms, reality ends precisely where the immortal begins; and since for him reality ends where the immortal begins, he cannot arrive at any concept of this immortality. We see again in David Friedrich Strauß, the representative of materialism in modern times, how strangely these things are thought of. David Friedrich Strauß has a very low opinion of the church fathers. For him, they are dismissed people; but he does remember one of these dismissed people, one of these church fathers, who he liked. He expresses himself somewhat strangely about him, somewhat coarsely, but in a certain sense, cleverly. David Friedrich Strauß gives this characterization mainly because the church father said, “Only that which is not is incorporeal.” — That is also David Friedrich Strauß's conviction: Only that which is not is incorporeal. One might just as well say: what is non-spatial; but “the spiritual — the sublime — does not dwell in space”.
This is what still causes particular difficulties for the world view of our time. This world view of our time assumes that in order to understand something that can be grasped at all, it is absolutely necessary that it be linked to familiar concepts. The thinking habits of our time demand that when we speak of spiritual realities we use concepts with which they are already familiar. They do not want to be led to unfamiliar concepts, but want to have something they already know. One should point to something that they already know. This is what all philosophers have done who have spoken of a soul 'substance'. They say: the soul must simply have a substance; this then passes through the gate of death. But one can say: natural science in particular could prepare people for what spiritual science will actually have to address these things bit by bit. You all know the very simple way in which one elastic billiard ball can be steered towards another; then the other takes on any direction. And the direction that the second ball gets depends on the direction and movement of the first ball. Physics is clear about the fact that the state of motion of the second ball has emerged from the state of motion of the first and that everything that can be found in the state of motion of the second ball can be found in the motion of the first. There is a transition of the motion of the first ball to the motion of the second. But anyone who would think something completely absurd would say: I cannot imagine that the movement of the second ball depends on the movement of the first ball. But just as absurd is the thought of the soul for someone who cannot imagine that the soul-spiritual is something different than what reminds of the physical in its essence. Just as it would be if one were to demand that the first sphere send some of its substance into the second so that something would be present in the second, — so it would be if one were to demand that in the life which the soul enters into after death there should be that which can already be found in the experiences which the soul undergoes while it is in the body, only through this body.
But it is also necessary to recognize the difficulty that stands in the way of spiritual science, namely that this spiritual science must not only speak of things that go beyond the sense world, but must also expect people to accept new, different concepts than those they have in order to grasp this spiritual; that the concepts must be enriched, that one must not merely talk around with the same concepts and ideas. Therefore, what spiritual science has is often incomprehensible to those who stand on the standpoint of today's habits of thought, because they actually only hear words that sound fantastic, that appear to be coined together, and because they do not engage with what the spiritual researcher takes from his experiences. For when the spiritual scientist has brought these things alive from the spiritual world, they are comprehensible to the power of judgment. One can understand with sound judgment what the spiritual researcher has brought from the spiritual world. To do so, not everyone needs to be a spiritual researcher; one need only examine without prejudice what the spiritual researcher is able to give, and one will be able to understand it. He who says that no one can possibly admit that what the spiritual researcher says is true without becoming a spiritual researcher himself, should also claim that no one can prove by any kind of reasoning that someone is a thief if he has not carried out the theft himself. Such things seem absurd when they are expressed, but they are all the more correct in the light of a universal logic. Above all, however, one thing will become completely clear to humanity when the spiritual-scientific results of this humanity become comprehensible, when people begin to think about things without prejudice. One thing will become clear: that there is something in human nature that is a weaving and living only in the spiritual, even in everyday life. There it is, but it can only be interpreted in the right way with the help of spiritual science. Something in our daily life from waking up to falling asleep is spiritual in nature; but the materialistically thinking person will not accept it: it is the process we go through in our memory. When we remember something, when we look back on an experience we had in the past, then this remembering, this directing of our soul forces to something that no longer takes place, is an entirely spiritual process; the soul performs it only in the soul-spiritual.
One will only admit this if one has already grasped the nature of the spiritual. For, of course, from the present state of natural science, one can easily say: Yes, movement transforms into warmth, as physical research shows us; why shouldn't external processes transform into sensation and thought within us? Of course they do. They do it by evoking processes that are the mirror in which our being is reflected. One can say: natural science is quite right. Only by fully embracing natural science and not fighting it, but then also asserting spiritual experiences, can one make progress. So someone might say: So the spiritual processes are a transformation of the external processes. Just as movement is transformed into warmth, so that which is outside in the world is transformed into that which is within us. But this was only valid as long as it could not be proven that when we transform movement into warmth, something always remains that is there, always there. That has remained warmth, is never anything but warmth. This is apparent to someone who really follows the bodily process from outside his body, who follows what the body can actually do. It is apparent to him that although, when we perceive in the external world, the process that is built up by the senses and continues in the brain is a continuation of the external process, this is not correct in relation to what we remember. And it is precisely at this point that the ever-advancing science will show that, by focusing attention on the physical processes, the process of memory, which is a purely spiritual process, could never somehow arise from the physical processes. It will be possible to show, in a strictly scientific way, that what happens physically in us when we remember is not the mental process, or has more to do with it than the strokes of a pen on paper have to do with what I read. When I have a word consisting of certain lines in front of me, I do not read by looking at the word and tracing my thoughts, but by connecting a meaning with this sign through something in me that has nothing to do with what is on the paper. Thus one will come to realize that the memory process that takes place in the body has as little to do with physical processes as my reading process has to do with the forms on the paper. Memory will present itself as a spiritual process that intervenes in physical life. But then one will also recognize that already in our ordinary physical life between birth and death we are surrounded by the essence that we must grasp in a higher, more intense sense if we want to look towards the immortal. When materialism asks: What is mortal in man? and answers: Everything that man experiences here in the sense world! — then spiritual science can also say to him: Yes, you are right; everything that a person experiences here in the world of the senses is mortal in the human being. But just as an event passes by in our physical life and we remember it at a later point in time purely through the spiritual essence of our soul, so too is it with our soul. As long as we are searching for a “soul substance,” we are incapable of even approaching that which is immortal in the human being. As soon as we know that what is not even noticed in our ordinary mortal existence because it is as if a person stands before a mirror and sees only his reflection, only knows himself in the image, — as soon as we know that what what is ignored in ordinary life, what we know nothing about in ordinary life, what we only know as in an image, - that precisely this is what is retained after our death and lives in the memory of earthly life, we can also understand: What we are here, it goes as a fact, as that, as what it lives here, perishable in the human being. That which remains for the soul, the soul that does not know itself in life, that is the memory that will be incorporated into the experiences that the human being then undergoes in the purely spiritual world after death.
Only when one begins to understand what a purely soul-spiritual process memory is, only then does one point to that which continues beyond death. Here, the power of memory already lives in the formation of thought and will and reveals itself here as spiritual. In the memory that lives in us, we do not carry across the threshold of death as soul substance, but as power, that which we are in the time between birth and death. For anyone who does not aspire to spiritual science, the possibility of imagining anything in what has been said disappears immediately, for the reason that he has nothing left to remember according to his ideas. For in everything he can think of, he has in mind that he must have something substantial that he already knows. He does not want to come to the realization that he has something only as a gift of memory that he does not know.
Thus, in our memory, we are actually given something that leads us to the otherwise unknown concepts of the spiritual process by which an immortal separates from the mortal, so that we have to recognize it. And so it appears to us in something else in the spiritual research process that we must, as it were, take hold of ourselves more strongly, so that the powers of comprehension expand beyond that which would otherwise receive no attention, in order to enter the spiritual world. For example, we can hold up an ideal to ourselves that is yet to be achieved, that is just as absent in the present as a past experience. Then we also stand in a purely spiritual process to this ideal. The materialist will indeed lose himself with a kind of voluptuousness in a certain impasse; he will want the soul to have a physical relationship to an ideal. But the real relationship to an ideal is a purely spiritual one. Only those who know that memory is also a purely spiritual process can understand this.
Now, however, a person usually does not experience the ideal in such a way that he can become fully warm, let alone fiery, towards the ideal. It remains somewhat cold, even if he admires it. At most, he becomes warm when he is directly involved in a process in which the ideal lives in some way in the outside world, where he can go along with the ideal. But when the ideal is raised in his soul purely as a thought and he can then connect feelings and volitional impulses only with the ideal, so that he also directs his will towards it, and when he does this more often, when he adds these volitional exercises to the concentration, — then gradually a feeling develops in the soul that we not only have a power of intuition and memory, but that we also have something that, although it is of a volitional nature, can be described as a foreknowledge of future events. There is something prophetic in the human soul. This is not just some kind of superstition. Spiritual science shows that this prophetic gift is extremely difficult to manifest in man only because man in the physical body must use the powers that would otherwise allow him to perceive what is approaching him; he must use this power to build up the physical body; it flows into it and is transformed. Because we have already gone through the past life process, we are able to apply the growth forces that we have retained from it, in terms of soul and spirit, as a power of remembrance. As we live in the physical body towards the future, we have to apply the strength we need to maintain the body in the physical body. So it is very difficult to get to know certain forces, though not in the way people imagine, but in a much more intimate and quiet way. They are present in the human being. Spiritual research can get to know them in such a way that it learns to understand that in what is immortal in the human soul, there is something that really carries this soul's rich content through death and into the future. Through this spiritual science, man really becomes aware of the power itself that carries him through the gateway of death.
Thus spiritual science cannot answer the question, “What is mortal about the human being?” as easily as one might think. But it shows the way to find out what is mortal in the human being, by showing what lives in man as the immortal, unnoticed by ordinary attention, and how this immortal can, as it were, objectively survey one's own ordinary life between birth and death. But this can only be the case when a person comes to recognize that his being is a self-contained entity, outside of the physical, and that this self-contained entity actually has an effect on the body from outside of the body. Just as a person standing in front of a mirror affects his reflection, so the true essence of the soul affects the physical, reflecting back what it is for this earthly life. Because in earthly life we have only a reflection of our true nature, and this can only be present as long as what is reflected stands before the mirror, what we actually experience as present in earthly life is fundamentally the mortal part. Man gets to know that which underlies it as mortal, as that in which his immortal part dwells, as in his tool – I do not say in his shell, but in his tool.
In this way, the question, “What is mortal in the human being?” can be answered in full accordance with current natural science. And this will be of tremendous importance for the future of spiritual development. It will be of tremendous importance because the natural scientist can always point out when one speaks of an independent soul, of soul substance, and can always say: Yes, just look at this soul; it grows with the growth of the body, of the brain, it grows with aging. When the body falls ill and dies, the soul is no longer there. Merely inferring the soul from external appearances does not make it possible to object to facts. The soul must be recognized in a field that lies outside of facts. One must be able to say yes to all legitimate objections, not no. And spiritual science can do that. Therefore, when those who believe they are standing on the firm ground of natural science come and say, “We know that! We know that! We know that!” You must not come to us with spiritual science! then the spiritual scientist stands before them and says: Nothing, absolutely nothing, to the very last thing you say, is denied by spiritual science; for what you know, what natural science knows, that is mortal in the human being. Nothing is denied to you by spiritual science, it only shows that there is a path of human knowledge to something other than what you know. Then the natural scientist is no longer able to argue with logical reasons, but he must forbid that one knows something other than he knows. Then he has only this single objection. And that is really the only objection that can come from natural science. One cannot refute the spiritual scientific world view, because the objections that one makes, the spiritual researcher admits them all. It must be asserted: I alone have the right to decide where research may be carried out; and if you assert anything other than what may be asserted according to my will, then you are a fantasist. — From that side, spiritual science cannot be refuted with reasons, but only and solely by fiat. Spiritual science can only be eliminated if people agree to suppress spiritual scientific research by majority vote. Spiritual science cannot be refuted by logic, but only by brutality; but it will only be able to stand up to natural science if it is on a par with natural science, if it does not come up with amateurish things and wants to refute natural science with them. It must be able to show that it is capable of conquering a field in which even the old philosophical concepts of the soul's substance can no longer be applied, but for which new concepts must be created. That is why so much of what appears in the literature of spiritual science still seems absurd. But the absurdity only exists because we have never been accustomed to such concepts; that is why we reject them. Spiritual science is producing something completely new. It is not by fighting natural science, but by opposing something, that we can pave the way for spiritual science. Even in terms of its way of thinking, spiritual science can fully meet the justified demands of natural science. For if someone were to say: I stand on the firm ground of natural science; anyone who has their five senses and relies on them and on what the mind can grasp on the basis of these five senses cannot agree with the fantasies of spiritual science, — then the spiritual researcher replies: Just take a little look at yourself! You admit that for a long time people lived as those who relied on the healthy five senses. Then came Copernicus. He established a world view in relation to the outer world that flies in the face of the five senses. Indeed, it took many people a long time, right up to the present day, to recognize or acknowledge the truth of Copernicus' world view. But just as human truth found a way to go beyond the five senses in relation to the external science of the world in those days, so spiritual science will lead beyond that which is to be established by the fiat of the five senses with regard to the supersensible. For this supersensible allows even less that one should rely only on one's “healthy five senses”.
Now we see that the path of development that a person must take if he wants to become a spiritual researcher is not something that everyone needs to take. If there were only a few spiritual researchers and they established truths that the intellect could grasp, then everyone would be able to understand them. We see that the path that the spiritual researcher is led along consists of taking hold of one's own soul in order to guide it further. Just as the child must develop by being led from the time when it cannot yet say 'I' to itself, to a time when it can say it, so the soul, when the spiritual researcher has a hold on it, can develop to become a companion of the spiritual world. But here the soul must take hold of itself. This is a purely spiritual-soul process. Humanity has been on the path to this process for a long time. One of the spirits of Central European spiritual development, of whom I spoke here recently, coined a beautiful phrase that could be said to point the way for human feeling, human thinking, human will — the path that ultimately leads to the human becoming a spiritual researcher themselves. The German mystic Meister Eckhart, who died in 1327, coined a beautiful phrase. A word, so to speak, that, when meditated upon, has the power to point the soul to the path that leads into the spiritual world. You cannot just let such a word sink in once or a few times, but you have to let it sink in day after day. For behind such a saying lies a deep spiritual experience, which the one who brought it forth out of the innermost structure of his soul has already gone through. Master Eckhart says:
"He who wishes to attain the highest perfection of his being and to see God, the highest good, must have a knowledge of himself and of that which is above him, to the very bottom. Only in this way will he attain the highest sincerity.
Therefore, dear man, know yourself; this is better for you than if you knew the powers of all creatures.
Know Thyself! — the saying that already stood on the Apollonian sanctuary. But self-knowledge, which is most intimately connected with the path into the spiritual worlds, is, so to speak, the most, most difficult! Even the most external self-knowledge is something difficult for man. The philosopher Ernst Mach gives a curious example of this. In his “Analysis of Sensations” he reveals how he fared with regard to self-knowledge even in the most superficial area. He recounts how he was once crossing the street and saw his own image in a tilted mirror. He was shocked by the ugly, repulsive face that looked back at him, and lo and behold: it was his own. And when he was already a professor, something similar happened to him. He came tired from a trip and boarded a bus. On the other side, he saw a man get on, and he thought: What kind of dried-up schoolmaster gets on there! And again, the person who got on the bus opposite him turned out to be himself; he had seen himself in a mirror. And he says: So I knew the profession of Habirus better than my own. We see from this case that one can even be a famous professor and have all the qualities and powers of a famous professor and yet not have come very far in terms of the most external self-knowledge.
But much more difficult is that which can be attained of self-knowledge of the soul. And it must be said that what is often defined as self-knowledge is nothing more than an egoistic feeling about an inner experience. Truly, real self-knowledge can only be acquired through spiritual science.
But – and perhaps it does not seem far-fetched; for not far-fetched is also everything to which not only logic, but also feelings, which are caused by much of what occurs in the present is caused — this path, which must lead to spiritual science, is indicated particularly by such impulses as those just mentioned by Meister Eckhart, but which can be enumerated in many other ways. For humanity is on this path. And if we want to point to someone in more recent times who, in terms of working out the spiritual from the material, was also on the path to spiritual science, we can point to Goethe. Goethe, to mention just one example, wanted to show in his Metamorphosis of Plants how, in the leaf, in the individual leaf, there is that which can transform itself and, in transforming itself, presents itself as a different organ. But he also endeavored to implement the idea of transformation in other fields. This proved fruitful for him and led him to remarkable scientific results, some of which are still rejected out of hand by science today. And yet, many seeds for the future spiritual-scientific world view lie in Goethe's way of thinking. When one builds up one's own structure of ideas and transforms it into a living spiritual experience, one realizes how fruitful Goethe's world view is, which is so vividly contained, for example, in the small work 'Metamorphosis of Plants'. One then realizes that the highest spiritual powers, for which one must first seek words, concepts and ideas, those processes that the soul undergoes when it leaves the mortal body, already have a metamorphosis in the ordinary memory process. One needs only to have enough universality of mind to follow this process in metamorphoses, to recognize it as a life process of the soul freed from the mortal body. Then one notices that what is mortal in the human being passes away just as the flower that remains, which withers, is understood to be separate from the germ, which continues into a new plant. But it was only logical that Goethe should apply this way of thinking to the physical world as well. It is only that he is not yet understood. It must appear comprehensible that the physicist, who believes himself to be on the ground of truth when he is on the ground of physical hypotheses, rejects Goethe's theory of colors. The deeper reason for this rejection is none other than that Goethe's Theory of Colors is grasped and set forth by a human being who has allowed the inner driving force to take effect in him, which lives in the human being's spirit, and that today one seeks a theory of colors in physics that is based only on those cognitive abilities of the human being that are mediated by the body.
As spiritual science develops as a fruit of human spiritual striving, something like the Goethean theory of colours will also be recognized along with spiritual science itself. Then people will understand why another spirit, who also felt the impulse of the eternal spiritual in his soul, who, motivated by the same impulse, also wanted to comprehend the outer world, why this spirit stood up for the theory of colours, and indeed for something else — Hegel, Hegel was also one of those who were deeply connected with the sustaining power of the German spirit, which has already been described here yesterday. With all the power of eloquence that was his, he opposed the belittling of his fellow countryman Kepler, the great Kepler, who is known to anyone who has even slightly looked into a physics book as the one who found the so-called Kepler's laws. Hegel showed that these laws already contain what Newton had merely formulated in mathematical formulas. The world has otherwise noticed this only a little. Hegel has shown: Newton puts mathematical letters where Kepler has expressed his laws; he only changes a little the formulas. Newton has done nothing but expressed in mathematical terms and formulas the Kepler laws. But Hegel was concerned with the reality and not with the form of expression.
I already said that I would like to mention something that only belongs here in a subjective way. I would like to draw attention to the fact that this has happened to us several times recently, as it did there, that the person who only found the form of expression is presented as the great physicist, instead of the person who actually found the essence of the matter – Goethe. In accordance with a spiritual world view, Goethe discovered everything that is connected with the developmental theory of organisms. However, one must be borne by the spiritual, as he himself was, if one wants to see this spiritual world view as the natural developmental theory. For the spirit behind all sensuality, Goethe was strengthened, not weakened, by his natural developmental theory. But in many cases it was too difficult for humanity to understand the transformation of organisms in the Goethean way. People grasped it more easily when it was presented to them in a way that did not place such great demands on the intellect as in Darwin's account. And these things could still be applied to many, many more things.
The second half of the 19th century is the time when people fell victim to shallower thinking in many fields. In German intellectual life, the deeper impulses and germs of thought lie everywhere for that which a shallower way of thinking has stood for. It will certainly be a matter of reflecting on what the “supporting forces of German intellectual life” are; of reflecting on how the true theory of evolution must be presented not in the Darwinian sense, but in the Goethean sense. But this leads to the thoughts that, as I explained yesterday, can bring about a change of heart in many areas in our difficult times, that we have to achieve victories in other respects as well, perhaps more than we think: the victory of German intellectual life, the victory of the deeper principles of a world view, as they are prepared in German intellectual life, – in contrast to what has come over from England so often as the shallower things. This is not said in a nationalistically chauvinistic spirit but simply and historically. The German mind must realize that much that is English must be sent back to its source. And one can say: in this respect, German intellectual life can hope that the germs within it will come more and more to fruition in the future. But then that which is the German soul, the German spirit, must be defended in the same way as it is defended by our self-sacrificing contemporaries. For what is being defended here is the most sacred possession of mankind. Not only are German territory and German people surrounded on all sides by enemies as if in a fortress, but the noblest German spiritual heritage is also surrounded and besieged as if in a fortress and must be defended. Truth is the same everywhere; but it is also true that the capacity for truth is not developed in the same way everywhere. As regards German intellectual life, it may be said that the clarity and religious nature with which German idealism approached the spiritual is a beginning from which there is a gradual ascent to a truly spiritual Weltanschauung. Hence we may cherish the hope, based on truthful knowledge and not on mere feelings, that the German spirit will be given the opportunity to develop that which those who are familiar with the German spirit are familiar with in this German spirit, those who are familiar with the connection between the German spirit and the path to the spiritual worlds. And there is a word of Goethe's that the Alsatian poet Lienhard refers to in his remarkable brochure “Germany's European Mission” — a word of Goethe's that he uttered in 1813 in a conversation with Luden. He says:
“The destiny of the Germans is... not yet fulfilled. If they had had no other task to fulfill than to break up the Roman Empire and create and order a new world, they would have perished long ago. But since they have continued to exist, and in such strength and efficiency, I believe they must still have a great future, a destiny...”
In many other areas, too, there are still many German determinations to be found. But there is no doubt that the determination to lead German idealism to spiritualism, to a completely spiritual world view, also still lies within the German development. For, whatever may happen, only one thing can happen: that what has emerged from such a deeply inner experience as a word of Goethe's, which he has just placed at the end of the poem where he presents the deepest human struggle with the world spirit, will be a fruitful part of this process. It is not without reason that the German world-view has given rise to Faust, this portrayal of the struggle with the world spirit for a way into the spiritual world. Just at the time when Germany allowed itself to be overcome spiritually, to a certain extent, by a foreign world-view, the strange dictum was repeatedly expressed that Germany was Hamlet. Germany is not Hamlet. It is only a misunderstanding to believe that. In the innermost forces of German development lies something that can never be uttered by Hamlet – “To be or not to be, that is the question” is a saying of Hamlet – but the German spirit says: the spirit is the source of all being, and the soul finds its true destiny, its true essence; and “only on spiritual ground, only by looking beyond the material, can the soul unfold its full power.” That is the German development, considered in the right style, connected with the spiritual essence of humanity in general, that one must say: May the present painful events bring much more, - but that lies in the German development itself as a deepest justification, that one will have to say:
Such a victory of the German spirit must emerge from these painful times, in the face of the onslaught of all enemies of the German spirit, that, by virtue of the other purposes of the German people, it can also fulfill what springs from the words with which the most German, but at the same time the most profound poetry of mankind concludes – which sounds like a victory cry against all materialism, like the herald's call before every spiritual world view: “The transitory is not the permanent”. At the end of “Faust” we are met with what sounds like a true motto of a truly spiritual world view: “All that is transitory is only a parable”.
And the German spirit still has much to contribute to making this the goal of human endeavor. And we hope that the present difficult times will help it to fully fulfill its destiny in this direction.