Second Book — The Repentances of Pistis Sophia

Tradition:
Gnostic Christian
Author:
Anonymous (Askew Codex)
Form:
Gnostic Christian dialogue
Approx. date:
c. 300 CE
Source context· Greco-Christian stream · Greco-Latin cultural age
Stream
Greco-Christian
Cultural age
Greco-Latin (4th post-Atlantean cultural age)
Composed
c. 300 CE
Soul-faculty
Intellectual Soul — the text addresses the soul's aspiration toward supersensible light-worlds through cognitive-devotional effort (gnosis), but its orientation remains inward and representational rather than fully self-transparent, placing it in the Intellectual Soul register per GA 144.

What this work carries

Book Two of the Pistis Sophia preserves late antique Gnostic Christian elaborations of the soul's fall and redemption, drawing on Egyptian, Platonic, and Jewish-apocalyptic mystery currents that circulated in the Hellenistic milieu. It surfaces an esoteric Christology in which the redeemer-being descends through hierarchical light-worlds to recover a fallen feminine spiritual principle. These themes carry forward initiatory knowledge from pre-Christian mystery streams into a dialogic, post-apostolic literary form.

Language frame

The work is composed in Coptic, translated from a Greek Vorlage, and takes the form of a post-resurrection dialogue between the risen Christ and his disciples, including Mary Magdalene as a primary interlocutor. Its structural device of repeated penitential psalms (the 'repentances') attributed to Pistis Sophia gives the text its distinctive liturgical-initiatory character.

Steiner’s engagement

  • GA 228, 1923-07-28Steiner notes that Gnostic writings were systematically destroyed and that Europeans therefore know them only through polemical counter-writings, making direct encounter with texts such as the Pistis Sophia historically exceptional.
  • GA 87, 1902-04-19Steiner characterises the Gnostics as heirs to the ancient world-religious systems whose foundational views were still widely operative at the time Gnostic Christianity crystallised.
  • GA 87, 1902-03-29Steiner describes the Gnostic understanding of the Christ impulse as involving a recognition of 'messiah'-figures who stand at the threshold between earlier religious streams and the specifically Christian event.
  • GA 69c, 1912-11-16Steiner identifies the central Gnostic insight — represented by Basilides, Marcion, and Valentinus — as the recognition that the Christ impulse is absolutely necessary for the whole of humanity's earthly development.
  • GA 69c, 1914-01-10Steiner states that spiritual-scientific examination reveals the Gnostics derived their ideas from the deepest inner sources available to them, and that these ideas deserve rigorous re-evaluation rather than dismissal.
  • GA 175, 1917-03-27Steiner lists the Ophites among the leading Gnostic exponents and notes that knowledge of Gnosticism was long mediated solely through the hostile accounts of orthodox opponents such as Irenaeus and Epiphanius.

Cross-tradition congruence

  • Neoplatonic hypostatic descent (Plotinus, Enneads)The descent and straying of Pistis Sophia through successive light-aeons shows structural congruence with Plotinus's account of Soul's procession from the One into matter and its subsequent return, both narrating a hierarchical emanative fall and redemptive reascent.
  • Vedantic māyā and the bound jīvaThe figure of Pistis Sophia trapped in the chaos of matter through her own desire-driven leap mirrors the Vedantic structure of the individual self (jīva) bound by avidyā and requiring salvific gnosis for liberation — a cross-tradition congruence of ignorance-fall-redemption-through-knowledge.
  • Jewish Kabbalistic Shekhinah in exileThe motif of a feminine divine principle fallen into exile and requiring restoration by a higher power shows cross-tradition congruence with the Lurianic Kabbalistic doctrine of the Shekhinah's exile and the tikkun process of cosmic repair.

JSON: /api/sources/pistis-sophia/book-2/index.json · Back to Sources.