{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 104/1908-06-26/p022","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"Now you will remember that we spoke of the seven ages of the Atlantean evolution. These seven ages comprise the first four and the last three. In the first four man was completely group-soul. Then in the fifth age the first impulse to the “I-soul” originated. Therefore we have four stages of development in Atlantis during which man first progresses as group-soul, and each of the first four Atlantean races corresponds to one of the typical animal forms—lion, eagle, bull and man. This passes over into the human stage in the fifth age. These typical forms are then lost. Now imagine that in the present epoch man permeates himself with the Christ-principle and thereby conquers his animal nature more and more; but if he does not permeate himself with the Christ-principle, he does not over-come the animal nature. The four typical heads, lion, eagle, bull and man, remain, so to speak, as something which assumes its form again as soon as it has the opportunity, and in addition come three others, those of the last three races of the Atlantean epoch, when man had already begun to be man. These three also remain if man does not work in his soul so that this animal nature disappears. How then will a man appear on the spiritualized earth who during our epoch has not taken into himself the Christ-principle? He will appear in materiality; he will reappear in the shapes from which he has come. He has had these animal forms and has passed through three others as well. He has left unused that which could have overcome the animal nature. The animal nature springs forth again, and, indeed, in seven forms. As once in Atlantis there emerged the four heads, the animal man, so out of the transformed earth, the astralized earth, seven such typical heads will again emerge, and the drama that took place at that time will again be enacted. The germ of the spiritual man was there, but he could not yet develop an individual form; he developed the four animal heads. The embryo human being of that epoch is also represented by the woman who brings forth man. The man of the future is also represented by the woman who gives birth to the spiritual man. But that which has remained in the flesh is represented on the secondary earth by the animal with seven heads, just as there were four heads in the period before man had the possibility of overcoming the animal nature, so those who have remained in the animal nature will appear as one entity, as the beast with the seven heads. Thus in the future, after the earth has united with the sun, while the spiritualized earth is above, there actually appears below, all that has not taken into itself the spiritual principle. The animal heads reappear which were there formerly, except that now they are out of their time. They are now the “adversary;” previously they were in the right period, the period of preparation. Thus we see that as at that time there arose from the physical, there now arises from the astral sea—the sun is also astralized—the monster with the seven heads, the seven-headed beast. All that was deposited in man by the etheric body is called in the mystery language—which the Apocalyptist also uses—a head, because when seen clairvoyantly it produces a typical form of head, e.g. a lion's head.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"Lecture IX","site_heading":"Human Evolution and the Spiritualized Earth's Future Form","site_heading_note":"A heading the site wrote for this unit from a summary of it; not in the edition, and not the words of Rudolf Steiner or of the translator. Cite the unit by its title and locus, never by this heading, and do not quote it.","date":"1908-06-26","location":null,"word_count":573,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/104/1908-06-26/p022","alignment_confidence":"medium","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Mabel Cotterell","identified_edition":"APC1958","book_title":"The Apocalypse of St. John","publisher":"Anthroposophical Publishing Co.","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA104/English/APC1958/19080626p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/104/1908-06-26/p022"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/104/1908-06-26/p022","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1908-06-26","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 104/1908-06-26/p025","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/104/1908-06-26/p025"},{"locus":"GA 104/1908-06-26/p026","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/104/1908-06-26/p026"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":485,"en_words":932,"ratio":1.92,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 104/1908-06-26/p025","passage_number":25,"text":"So also tritt tatsächlich in der Zukunft einmal, nachdem sich die Erde mit der Sonne vereinigt hat, während oben die vergeistigte Erde ist, unten alles dasjenige auf, was nicht in sich aufgenommen hat das geistige Prinzip, und es erscheinen wiederum die Tierköpfe, die einstmals da waren, nur daß sie jetzt außer ihrer Zeit sind. Jetzt sind sie die Widersacher; vorher, in der Zeit der Vorbereitung, waren sie in der richtigen Zeit. So sehen wir, daß, wie damals aus dem physischen, jetzt aus dem astralischen Meer aufsteigt — die Sonne ist auch astralisiert — das Ungeheuer mit den sieben Köpfen, das siebenköpfige Tier. Alles dasjenige, was im Menschen veranlagt wird durch den ätherischen Leib — bitte das zu beachten -, das nennt man in der Mysteriensprache, der sich auch der Apokalyptiker bedient, einen «Kopf» oder ein Haupt, weil es eine solche typische Hauptgestalt wie den Löwenkopf hervorruft, wenn man es hellseherisch sieht. Daran müssen wirken die ätherischen Kräfte. Wenn wir die atlantische Entwickelung verfolgen, so war da der Ätherleib noch außerhalb des Kopfes. Das, was vom Ätherischen aus im Menschen veranlagt wird, nennt man in der Sprache der apokalyptischen Mysterien «Kopf». Damit meint man also das, was dem hellseherischen Blick vorzugsweise als Kopf erscheint. Dasjenige aber, was physisch im Menschen bewirkt wird durch irgendein Glied des Ätherleibes, das nennt man ein «Horn». Ein «Horn» ist in der Sprache der Mysterien also eine sehr geheimnisvolle Sache. Dasjenige, was zum Beispiel im Menschen physisch bewirkt worden ist dadurch, daß er einmal durchgegangen ist durch diejenige Rasse der atlantischen Zeit, in welcher typisch der Löwe als Gruppenseele da war, das nennt man ein Horn. Also das Physische, das von irgendeinem Glied des Ätherleibes herkommt, nennt man ein «Horn». Ein Horn ist zum Beispiel das Organ, welches der äußere physische Ausdruck für irgend etwas Ätherisches ist.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":301,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/104/1908-06-26/p025"},{"locus":"GA 104/1908-06-26/p026","passage_number":26,"text":"Nun will ich Ihnen konkret sprechen. Alle physischen Organe des Menschen sind eigentlich verdichtete Ätherorgane, sind aus dem verdichteten Ätherleib hervorgegangen. Betrachten wir das menschliche Herz. Es ist heute ein physisches Organ, aber es ist aus einem Ätherorgan heraus verdichtet. Dieses heutige menschliche Herz hat seine Anlage erhalten damals, als der Mensch durch die Gruppenseelenhaftigkeit hindurchgegangen ist, die mit dem Löwen bezeichnet wird. Also ist das Herz das «Horn» des Löwenkopfes, denn als der Ätherleib so weit war, daß der Mensch erschien mit der Gruppenseele, die im Löwenkopf symbolisiert wird, da hat sich die Anlage gebildet, die später das physische Herz wurde. Aus dieser Anlage des Löwenmenschen entstand die heutige menschliche physische Herzanlage. Während wir also den Ätherleib zurückführen in seiner Entstehung auf die Verwandlung eines «Kopfes» in den anderen, auf das Hinzufügen des einen Kopfes zum anderen, fassen wir den menschlich physischen Leib auf als das Hinzufügen eines «Hornes» zum andern. Tatsächlich besteht der menschliche Ätherleib aus «Köpfen», der menschliche physische Leib aus «Hörnern». Das ist die Sprache der Mysterien. Alle Organe des Menschen sind aus dem Ätherleib herausgebildet, sind also lauter «Hörner».","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":184,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/104/1908-06-26/p026"}],"english":["GA 104/1908-06-26/p022","GA 104/1908-06-26/p023"],"method":"reader","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":485,"en_words":932,"ratio":1.92,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.01,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":5292,"original_word_count":5228,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Mabel Cotterell","identified_edition":"APC1958","book_title":"The Apocalypse of St. John","publisher":"Anthroposophical Publishing Co.","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA104/English/APC1958/19080626p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 104/1908-06-26/p025","GA 104/1908-06-26/p026"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":["Christ"],"bead_confidence":"high","bead_length_ratio":1.92,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}