{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 125/1910-08-26/p012","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"If we consider all this, we can ask: How is it that philosophy itself shows such reluctance to deal with those logical forms by which what comes from the other side can be established just as much as what comes from one side can be established epistemologically? The reason for this is that this philosophy of the nineteenth century and into the twentieth century has so far failed to take the step that should have been taken from a properly understood Hegelianism. And so it comes about that this philosophy of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries could not find a connection to that which lies beyond the plan of thought. The deeper reason for this, however, is to be found in the fact that Hegel's philosophy has been little understood by the further developing philosophy. For when one rises to the pure plan of thought, then it is quite inevitable — because one stands at the boundary of the supersensible world — that one can also feel those logical foundations that, as something justified, reveal the inflow of the supersensible world. You can feel this very strongly when you encounter this elevation of the human power of cognition to pure thought and then the illumination of the higher worlds in the lectures of our dear Dr. Unger, which cannot be overestimated. Therefore, it must be emphasized: it is a great blessing that we are able to have such a person among us as Dr. Unger is, who is able to elaborate in detail and carry out the theory of knowledge of pure thinking of the knowing subject, which lies as I on the thought plan, in this spiritual-philosophical field. And so, in these lectures, you have provided what can give you points of reference to gain strength in the relationship between spiritual science and other intellectual endeavors.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"VI. The Present State of Philosophy and Science","site_heading":null,"date":"1910-08-26","location":null,"word_count":307,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/125/1910-08-26/p012","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:identity","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Steiner Online Library","identified_edition":"SOL2024","book_title":"Paths and Goals of Spiritual Man","publisher":"Steiner Online Library","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA125/English/SOL2024/19100826p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/125/1910-08-26/p012"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/125/1910-08-26/p012","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 125/1910-08-26/p012","passage_number":12,"text":"Wenn wir das alles ins Auge fassen, können wir fragen: Wie kommt es denn, daß sich die Philosophie selber so abgeneigt zeigt, auf jene logischen Formen einzugehen, durch welche ebenso festgestellt werden kann das, was von der anderen Seite kommt, wie erkenntnistheoretisch festgestellt werden kann dasjenige, was von der einen Seite kommt? — Das kommt davon her, daß diese Philosophie des 19. Jahrhunderts und in das 20. Jahrhundert herein bis jetzt versäumt hat, den Schritt zu machen, der aus dem richtig verstandenen Hegeltum heraus hätte gemacht werden sollen. Und so kommt es, daß diese Philosophie des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts keinen Anschluß finden konnte an das, was jenseits des Gedankenplanes liegt. Allerdings ist der tiefere Grund darin zu suchen, daß die Hegelsche Philosophie von der weiter sich fortentwickelnden Philosophie wenig verstanden worden ist. Denn wenn man sich zum reinen Gedankenplan herauferhebt, dann ist es ganz. unumgänglich — weil man an der Grenze der übersinnlichen Welt steht —, daß man auch jene logischen Begründungen fühlen kann, die als etwas Berechtigtes das Einfließen der übersinnlichen Welt erkennen lassen. Das können Sie so recht fühlen, wenn Ihnen in den gar nicht genug zu schätzenden Vorträgen unseres lieben Dr. Unger entgegentritt dieses Erheben der menschlichen Erkenntniskraft zum reinen Gedanken und dann das Hereinleuchtenlassen der höheren Welten. Daher muß betont werden: Es gereicht zum größten Segen, daß wir in der Lage sind, eine solche Kraft unter uns zu haben, wie Dr. Unger es ist, der auf diesem spirituell-philosophischen Gebiet in der Lage ist, die Erkenntnistheorie des reinen Denkens des Erkenntnissubjektes, welches als Ich auf dem Gedankenplan liegt, im einzelnen auszuarbeiten, auszuführen. Und so haben Sie gerade in diesen Vorträgen das gegeben, was Ihnen Anhaltspunkte geben kann, um Festigkeit zu gewinnen im Verhalten zwischen der Geisteswissenschaft und den anderen geistigen Bestrebungen.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":295,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/125/1910-08-26/p012"}],"english":["GA 125/1910-08-26/p012"],"method":"identity","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":295,"en_words":307,"ratio":1.04,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"verified","verified":true,"evidence":["length","meaning","anchors","audit"]},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.04,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":7932,"original_word_count":7595,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Steiner Online Library","identified_edition":"SOL2024","book_title":"Paths and Goals of Spiritual Man","publisher":"Steiner Online Library","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA125/English/SOL2024/19100826p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 125/1910-08-26/p012"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}