{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 155/1912-05-29/p008","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"Consider the human form. You will at once admit that the most valuable parts in the human form are the bones of the head. But by what means could these particular bones become bones of the head and envelop the higher organ, the brain? As far as the rudiments are concerned, each bone that man possesses could become a skull-bone, but in order that a few of the bones of the whole skeleton could reach this height of development and become bones of the forehead or of the back part of the head, the hip bones or the joints had to stop at a lower stage of development—for the hip bones or the joints have within them the possibility of becoming skull bones, just as much as those which actually have done so. It is the same everywhere throughout the world. Progress is only possible in evolution through one remaining behind and another pushing forward, even beyond a certain point of deve1opment. In India the Brahmins passed beyond a certain average of development, but on the other hand the lower castes remained behind it.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"Lecture II","site_heading":"Moral Impulses: From Atlantean Fall to Francis of Assisi","site_heading_note":"A heading the site wrote for this unit from a summary of it; not in the edition, and not the words of Rudolf Steiner or of the translator. Cite the unit by its title and locus, never by this heading, and do not quote it.","date":"1912-05-29","location":null,"word_count":184,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/155/1912-05-29/p008","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Henry Collison","identified_edition":"APC1928","book_title":"Anthroposophical Ethics","publisher":"Anthroposophical Publishing Co.","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA155/English/APC1928/19120529p02.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/155/1912-05-29/p008"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/155/1912-05-29/p008","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"other_renderings":{"loci":[{"locus":"GA 155/1912-05-29_02","ga":"155","lecture":"1912-05-29_02","kind":"renderings","relation":"another translation or transcription of the same lecture"}],"note":"The same lecture is also served at the loci listed, each with how it relates to this one. They are ONE witness, not independent attestations: quote the rendering you fetched, and do not cite another as corroborating it. Wording differs between translations, so a quotation found in one need not occur in the other."},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1912-05-29","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 155/1912-05-29/p008","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/155/1912-05-29/p008"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":384,"en_words":408,"ratio":1.06,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 155/1912-05-29/p008","passage_number":8,"text":"Begreifen kann man dies nur, wenn man in die Geheimnisse des Daseins einen Blick wirft, denn das Dasein, die Entwickelung ist nur möglich durch Differenzierung, durch Gliederung. Und wenn zu jener Ausbildung von Weisheit, zu welcher es gekommen war in der Kaste der Brahminen, hätten alle Menschen kommen wollen, dann hätte gar keiner dazu kommen können. Man darf nämlich nicht sagen: Es widerspricht der göttlichen Weltenordnung, der göttlichen Weltenlenkung, daß nicht alle Menschen in gleicher Weise zur höchsten Weisheit gelangen, denn das würde nicht mehr Sinn haben, als wenn jemand fordern würde von der unendlich weisen und unendlich mächtigen Gottheit, daß sie ein Dreieck aus vier Ecken bilde. Keine Gottheit könnte ein Dreieck anders als aus drei Ecken machen. Das, was innerlich, was im Geiste geordnet und bestimmt ist, das muß eingehalten werden auch von der göttlichen Weltenregelung, und ein ebenso strenges Gesetz der Entwickelung, wie es das Gesetz für die Raumesgrenzen ist, nämlich, daß ein Dreieck nur drei Ecken haben kann, ist es, daß die Entwickelung durch Differenzierung geschehen muß, daß gewisse Gruppen von den Menschen abgesondert werden müssen, damit eine besondere Eigenschaft der menschlichen Entwickelung Platz greifen kann. Da müssen zunächst für eine gewisse Zeit die anderen Menschen ausgeschlossen sein. Das ist nicht nur ein Gesetz für die Entwickelung des Menschen im großen, sondern das ist ein Gesetz für die Entwickelung überhaupt. Betrachten Sie die menschliche Gestalt. Sie werden ohne weiteres sich gestehen, daß die vorzüglichsten, die am meisten schätzbaren Teile an der menschlichen Gestalt die Kopfknochen sind. Aber wodurch konnten die Kopfknochen nur Kopfknochen und die Umhüller des edlen Organes des Gehirns werden? Der Anlage nach kann jeder Knochen, den der Mensch an sich hat, Kopfknochen werden. Damit einige Knochen von dem gesamten Knochensystem diese Höhe der Entwickelung durchmachen können, Vorder- oder Hinterhaupthülle zu sein, mußten die Hüftknochen oder die Gelenkknochen zurückbleiben auf einer untergeordneten Stufe der Entwickelung, denn jeder Hüftknochen oder Gelenkknochen hat in sich die Anlage, geradeso Kopfknochen zu werden, wie diejenigen, die es geworden sind. So ist es überhaupt in der Welt: nur dadurch, daß das eine zurückbleibt, das andere vorrückt und sogar über einen gewissen Punkt der Entwickelung hinausrückt, ist eine Fortentwickelung möglich. So daß man sagen kann: Die Brahminen sind über einen gewissen mittleren Punkt der Entwickelung hinausgerückt, die niedersten Kasten dagegen sind dahinter wieder zurückgeblieben.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":384,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/155/1912-05-29/p008"}],"english":["GA 155/1912-05-29/p007","GA 155/1912-05-29/p008"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":384,"en_words":408,"ratio":1.06,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.99,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":7065,"original_word_count":7143,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Henry Collison","identified_edition":"APC1928","book_title":"Anthroposophical Ethics","publisher":"Anthroposophical Publishing Co.","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA155/English/APC1928/19120529p02.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 155/1912-05-29/p008"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}