{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 161/1915-01-10/p024","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"If the philosophers of today believe that they understand what Plato and Aristotle perceived as a universal symphony of thoughts, that is only due to a childish stage of the modern philosopher. The modern philosophers have a long way to go before they can fully grasp what Aristotle represents as Entelechy, what he gives as the members of the human soul nature—Aesthetikon, Orektikon, Kinetikon etc. The inner activity of thinking, where one draws the thoughts out of oneself, where one must make subjective efforts in order to think, did not as yet exist in Greece. It is completely foolish to believe that Plato thought he perceived thoughts. To believe that Aristotle already thought in the modern sense, is nonsense ... he perceived thoughts.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"Perception of the Nature of Thought","site_heading":null,"date":"1915-01-10","location":null,"word_count":123,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/161/1915-01-10/p024","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"M. Cotterell","identified_edition":"Singles","book_title":"Perception of the Nature of Thought","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA161/English/Singles/19150110p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line"},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/161/1915-01-10/p024"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/161/1915-01-10/p024","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1915-01-10","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 161/1915-01-10/p023","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/161/1915-01-10/p023"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":123,"en_words":123,"ratio":1.0,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 161/1915-01-10/p023","passage_number":23,"text":"Wenn heute die Philosophen glauben, das schon verstanden zu haben, was Plato und Aristoteles wie eine große Weltsymphonie von Gedanken wahrgenommen haben, so rührt dies nur von einer kindischen Einstellung der gegenwärtigen Philosophen her. Das, was Aristoteles als Entelechie, was er als Seelenglieder der Menschennatur — Ästhetikon, Orektikon, Kinetikon und so weiter — darlegt, vollständig zu begreifen, dazu werden die modernen Philosophen noch lange Wege machen müssen. Jenes innere Gedankenarbeiten, wo man die Gedanken aus sich herausholt, wo man subjektive Anstrengungen machen muß, um zu denken, das gab es in Griechenland noch gar nicht. Ganz unsinnig ist es, zu glauben, daß Plato gedacht hat; er hat Gedanken wahrgenommen. Daß Aristoteles im heutigen Sinne schon gedacht hätte, ist ein Unsinn; er hat Gedanken wahrgenommen.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":123,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/161/1915-01-10/p023"}],"english":["GA 161/1915-01-10/p024"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":123,"en_words":123,"ratio":1.0,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.99,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":6461,"original_word_count":6540,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"M. Cotterell","identified_edition":"Singles","book_title":"Perception of the Nature of Thought","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA161/English/Singles/19150110p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line"},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 161/1915-01-10/p023"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}