{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 161/1915-01-10/p046","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"Hegel has achieved thought that is the deepest which can be thought in earthly life—but which must lose its configuration with death. Hegel's tragedy lies in the fact that he did not realise he grasped the spirit in logic, in nature, in soul-life, but only the spirit that exists in the form of thought and does not accompany us when we go through death. To have put this clearly before his mind he would have had to say: If I could believe that what goes through thought, that is to say what I think about abstract being by means of logic, thoughts of nature, thoughts of the soul and up to philosophy—if I could believe that this leads me behind the scenes of existence than I should be deceived by Mephistopheles!","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"Perception of the Nature of Thought","site_heading":null,"date":"1915-01-10","location":null,"word_count":131,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/161/1915-01-10/p046","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"M. Cotterell","identified_edition":"Singles","book_title":"Perception of the Nature of Thought","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA161/English/Singles/19150110p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line"},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/161/1915-01-10/p046"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/161/1915-01-10/p046","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1915-01-10","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 161/1915-01-10/p045","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/161/1915-01-10/p045"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":127,"en_words":131,"ratio":1.03,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 161/1915-01-10/p045","passage_number":45,"text":"Hegel hat das Tiefste gedacht, was gedacht werden kann im Erdenleben, was aber in seiner Konfiguration mit dem Tode abstirbt. Und Hegels Tragik besteht darinnen: er hat nicht bemerkt, daß er den Geist in der Logik, in der Natur, im Seelenleben erfaßt, aber nur denjenigen Geist, der in der Form des Gedankens existiert, der aber nicht mitgeht, wenn wir durch den Tod gehen. Um dieses klar vor die Seele zu stellen, hätte er sich sagen müssen: Wenn ich glauben könnte, daß das, was durch das Denken hindurchgeht, was ich also denke vom abstrakten Sein durch die Logik, durch die Naturgedanken, durch die Seelengedanken und herauf bis zur Philosophie, wenn ich glauben könnte, daß das mich hinter die Kulissen des Daseins führt, dann wäre ich von Mephistopheles verlockt!","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":127,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/161/1915-01-10/p045"}],"english":["GA 161/1915-01-10/p046"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":127,"en_words":131,"ratio":1.03,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.99,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":6461,"original_word_count":6540,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"M. Cotterell","identified_edition":"Singles","book_title":"Perception of the Nature of Thought","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA161/English/Singles/19150110p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line"},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 161/1915-01-10/p045"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}