{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 175/1917-03-27/p027","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"As a consequence of this suppression of the Mystery teachings the perception of the spiritual in man was lost, the path to the spiritual in man was closed. It would have been dangerous for those who later sought to abolish the spirit under the influence of Rome, of Romanized Christianity, if many of those who had been initiated in the ancient Mystery schools of Palestine had still survived, if those who still preserved a memory of the spirit and could still bear witness to the fact that man consisted of body, soul and spirit. The policy of Romanism was to establish a social order in which the spirit had no place, to encourage an evolutionary trend that would exclude all spiritual impulses. This could not have been realized if too many people had known the interpretation of the Mystery of Golgotha that was adumbrated in the Mysteries. It was instinctively felt that nothing of a spiritual nature could emerge from the Roman State. From the union of the Church and the Roman State was born jurisprudence. In this the spirit had no part. It is important to bear this in mind.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"Lecture I","site_heading":"Reality-Based Thinking and the Spirit's Suppression","site_heading_note":"A heading the site wrote for this unit from a summary of it; not in the edition, and not the words of Rudolf Steiner or of the translator. Cite the unit by its title and locus, never by this heading, and do not quote it.","date":"1917-03-27","location":null,"word_count":191,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/175/1917-03-27/p027","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"A. H. Parker","identified_edition":"RSP1972","book_title":"Building Stones for an Understanding of the Mystery of Golgotha","publisher":"Rudolf Steiner Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA175/English/RSP1972/19170327p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/175/1917-03-27/p027"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/175/1917-03-27/p027","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1917-03-27","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 175/1917-03-27/p028","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/175/1917-03-27/p028"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":201,"en_words":191,"ratio":0.95,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 175/1917-03-27/p028","passage_number":28,"text":"Und mit dieser Ausrottung hängt es vielfach zusammen, daß auch die Anschauung vom pneumatischen Menschen, der Weg zum pneumatischen Menschen, zunächst, ich möchte sagen, verschlagen, vermauert wurde. Es wäre gefährlich geworden für diejenigen, die auch später von Rom aus, aus dem romanisierten Christentum heraus, den Geist abschaffen wollten, es wäre gefährlich für sie geworden, wenn noch viele vorhanden gewesen wären, die aus den alten Schulen Palästinas heraus etwas gewußt hätten über die Wege zum Geiste hin, die noch Zeugnis davon hätten ablegen können, daß der Mensch aus Leib, Seele und Geist besteht. Denn es mußte mit demjenigen, was vom Römertum ausging, etwas in bezug auf die äußere Menschenordnung begründet werden, bei dem der Geist nichts zu suchen hatte. Es mußte eine Entwickelungsströmung eingeleitet werden mit Ausschluß spiritueller Impulse. Das wäre nicht gegangen, wenn zu viele Menschen etwas gewußt hätten von der Mysterieninterpretation des Mysteriums von Golgatha. Denn instinktiv fühlte man, daß dasjenige, was sich aus dem römischen Staate entwickeln sollte, nichts vom Geist in sich haben durfte. Die Kirche und der römische Staat gingen eine Ehe ein, gliederten ja insbesondere dann aus dieser Ehe heraus auch noch die Jurisprudenz ein. Bei alledem durfte der Geist kein Wort mitreden. Das war wichtig.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":201,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/175/1917-03-27/p028"}],"english":["GA 175/1917-03-27/p027"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":201,"en_words":191,"ratio":0.95,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.97,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":6812,"original_word_count":7035,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"A. H. Parker","identified_edition":"RSP1972","book_title":"Building Stones for an Understanding of the Mystery of Golgotha","publisher":"Rudolf Steiner Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA175/English/RSP1972/19170327p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 175/1917-03-27/p028"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":["Christ"],"bead_confidence":"high","bead_length_ratio":0.95,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}