{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 186/1918-12-14/p016","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"The other thing must be considered in quite a different direction. Berdiayeff, as the whole spirit of his essay shows, witnesses the rise of Bolshevism with great discomfort. Well, in that respect, the one man or the other, according as he is a Bolshevist or the reverse, will say that Berdiayeff is right or wrong. I do not propose to dilate just now upon this question. I will describe the facts, I will not criticize. But this is the important thing: In the sixties, so says Berdiayeff, there was already the tendency to regard Truth and Philosophy as dependent on life, and at that time materialism found entry into Russia. Men believed in Materialism, because they found it useful and profitable for life. Then, in the seventies, Positivism, such as is held by Auguste Comte for example, came into vogue. And after that, other points of view, for example that of Nietzsche, found entry into Russia among the people known as the Intelligentsia. And now Berdiayeff asks the question: What kind of philosophy do we find among the Intelligentsia of the Bolsheviks? For, indeed, a certain philosophy is prevalent among them. But how this particular philosophy can go with Bolshevism, that Berdiayeff is quite at a loss to explain. He simply cannot understand how Bolshevism can regard as its own philosophy—curiously enough—the doctrine of Avenarius and Mach.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"II. The Logic of Thought and the Logic of Reality","site_heading":null,"date":"1918-12-14","location":null,"word_count":227,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/186/1918-12-14/p016","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"not_established","translator":null,"identified_edition":"C52","book_title":"The Fundamental Social Demand of Our Times","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA186/English/C52/19181214p01.html","evidence":null,"reason":"source_says_translator_unknown","note":"The source page itself says the translator is unknown. No translator is established for this lecture: nothing at the level of the lecture names one. Do not attribute this English to a translator, and do not borrow a credit from another lecture of the volume. Cite the German for anything load-bearing."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/186/1918-12-14/p016"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/186/1918-12-14/p016","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1918-12-14","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 186/1918-12-14/p014","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/186/1918-12-14/p014"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":224,"en_words":227,"ratio":1.01,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 186/1918-12-14/p014","passage_number":14,"text":"Etwas anderes ist nach einer ganz anderen Richtung hin zu beurteilen. Berdjajew sieht offenbar — das geht aus dem Sinn seines Aufsatzes hervor — mit einem großen Unbehagen das Auftauchen des Bolschewismus. Nun, darin mag der eine oder andere, je nachdem er Bolschewist ist oder nicht, ihm nun recht oder unrecht geben; das ist ja etwas, worüber ich mich jetzt nicht verbreiten will. Ich will die Tatsachen darstellen, ich will nicht kritisieren. Aber was wichtig ist, das ist das Folgende. So wie in den sechziger Jahren - so meint Berdjajew unter dem Gesichtspunkt, die Wahrheit, die Philosophie abhängig von dem Leben zu sehen -, so wie dazumal der Materialismus in Rußland Eingang gefunden und man an den Materialismus geglaubt hat, weil man ihn dienlich dem Leben gefunden hat, hat man in den siebziger Jahren an den Positivismus zum Beispiel von Auguste Comte geglaubt. Dann haben andere Anschauungen, zum Beispiel auch Neeizsche, in Rußland Eingang gefunden bei den Leuten, die der Intelligenz zugehören. Nun fragt sich Berdjajew, was denn jetzt bei den Bolschewisten, die zur Intelligenz gehören, für eine Philosophie Platz gegriffen habe. Es hat tatsächlich eine Philosophie Platz gegriffen. Aber über das Zusammengehen dieser eigentümlichen Philosophie mit dem Bolschewismus, da ist Berdjajew eigentlich ganz ratlos. Er kann gar nicht fassen, wie der Bolschewismus als seine Philosophie kurioserweise die Lehren von Avenarius und Mach betrachtet.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":224,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/186/1918-12-14/p014"}],"english":["GA 186/1918-12-14/p016"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":224,"en_words":227,"ratio":1.01,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.09,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":9153,"original_word_count":8380,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"not_established","translator":null,"identified_edition":"C52","book_title":"The Fundamental Social Demand of Our Times","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA186/English/C52/19181214p01.html","evidence":null,"reason":"source_says_translator_unknown","note":"The source page itself says the translator is unknown. No translator is established for this lecture: nothing at the level of the lecture names one. Do not attribute this English to a translator, and do not borrow a credit from another lecture of the volume. Cite the German for anything load-bearing.","warning":"No translator is recorded for this edition. An unattributed translation cannot be weighed as a witness: you cannot tell which hand made the choices in it. Cite the German for anything load-bearing."},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 186/1918-12-14/p014"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":["Nietzsche"],"bead_confidence":"high","bead_length_ratio":1.01,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}