12. Philosophy and Theosophy

GA 246/1908-08-17/p033 ·1908-08-17 · English HighHigh alignmentThis translation's paragraph count matches the German original — the locus maps cleanly to the same paragraph in DE.
Record: listeners' notes. Written from listeners' notes, summaries, or memory rather than a shorthand transcript. The wording is the note-taker's as much as Steiner's: weigh a single striking phrase here far more cautiously than the same phrase in a stenographic volume, and do not rest an argument on one word. Evidence: «Nach zum Teil bruchstückhaften Mitschriften» (From transcripts that are in part fragmentary). The publisher's description of the volume, as mirrored on AnthroWiki (GA 246), which also speaks of "fragmentarischen Hörernotizen und Vortragszusammenfassungen". The translation is the maintainer's, not a published one.

We only need to look at some of Aristotle's fundamental concepts to realize this. It is quite in his spirit to say: when we analyze the things around us, we first find what gives us knowledge of these things by perceiving with the sense: Sense provides us with the individual thing. But when we begin to think, things are grouped together, we combine different things into a unit of thought. - And now Aristotle finds the right relationship between this unity of thought and an objective reality, that objective which leads to the thing in itself - by showing that with consistent thinking we must think of the world of experience around us as composed of matter and what he calls form. For Aristotle, matter and form are two concepts that he really separates in the only correct sense in which they must be separated. We could talk for hours if we wanted to exhaust these two concepts and everything that is connected with them. But let us at least bring up a few elementary points in order to understand what Aristotle distinguishes between form and matter. He is clear about the fact that in relation to all things that are initially around us, that form our world of experience, it is important for cognition that we grasp the form, because it is the form that gives things their essence, not the matter. For Aristotle, form is the essence.

Read this passage in another edition
DEoriginalENEnglish
Raw JSON: /v1/steiner/en/ga/246/1908-08-17/p033.json
Cite: GA 246/1908-08-17/p033 · edition English