{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 26/l28/p013","lang":"en","edition":"RSP1973","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"In the time from the first Christian centuries until the evolutionary epoch of the Spiritual Soul, the dominant spiritual life was a Spirit-content hovering above mankind—a content with which man was quite unable to unite himself in Knowledge. He therefore united with it in an outward way. He ‘explained’ it, and pondered on the question: how, and why, and to what degree the faculties of the soul were insufficient to bring about the full union with it in Knowledge. Thus he distinguished the realm into which Knowledge can penetrate, from that into which it cannot. It became the proper thing to renounce the exercise of those faculties of soul which rise with Knowledge into the spiritual world. And at length the time approached—the turn of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries—in which the forces of the soul that inclined towards the Spirit were diverted from the Spiritual altogether, so far as active Knowledge was concerned. Men began to live their conscious life in those forces of the soul only, which are directed to the sense-perceptible.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"28. Historic Cataclysms at the Dawn of the Spiritual Soul","site_heading":null,"date":null,"location":null,"word_count":174,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/26/l28/p013","alignment_confidence":"medium","alignment_reason":"beads:structural_identity","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":null,"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["APC1956","RSP1973"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/26/l34/p013","locus":"GA 26/l34/p013","anchor_mapped":true,"anchor_method":"curated","anchor_confidence":"high"},{"lang":"en","edition":"RSP1973","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/26/l28/p013","paragraph_aligned":true},{"lang":"en","edition":"APC1956","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":false,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/26/l28/p013?edition=APC1956"}],"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"l34","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 26/l34/p013","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/26/l34/p013"}],"bead_confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":141,"en_words":174,"ratio":1.23,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 26/l34/p013","passage_number":13,"text":"Es ist die Zeit, von den ersten christlichen Jahrhunderten angefangen bis in das Zeitalter der Bewußtseinsseelenentwickelung hinein, eine solche, in der als maßgebliches Geistesleben über der Menschheit ein geistiger Inhalt waltet, mit dem sich der Mensch erkennend nicht verbinden kann. Er verbindet sich deshalb äußerlich; er «erklärt» ihn, und er denkt darüber nach, inwiefern die Seelenkräfte nicht ausreichend sind, um die erkennende Verbindung herbeizuführen. Er unterscheidet zwischen dem Gebiete, in das die Erkenntnis reicht, und dem, wohin sie nicht reicht. Es macht sich der Verzicht geltend, Seelenkräfte zu betätigen, die sich erkennend in die Geistwelt erheben. Und so kommt die Zeit heran, Wende des siebzehnten und achtzehnten Jahrhunderts, in der man sich mit den auf das Geistige gerichteten Seelenkräften von dem Geistigen überhaupt erkennend abwendet. — Man beginnt, nur in den Seelenkräften zu leben, die auf das sinnlich Wahrnehmbare gerichtet sind.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":141,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/26/l34/p013"}],"english":["GA 26/l28/p013"],"method":"structural_identity","confidence":"medium","correspondence":"unverified","length_check":{"de_words":141,"en_words":174,"ratio":1.23,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.17,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":1450,"original_word_count":1244,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"status":"unknown","warning":"No translator is recorded for this edition. An unattributed translation cannot be weighed as a witness: you cannot tell which hand made the choices in it. Cite the German for anything load-bearing."},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 26/l34/p013"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":["Christ"],"bead_confidence":"medium","bead_length_ratio":1.23,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}