{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 301/1920-04-22/p003","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"I have tried to give you some insight into the nature of the human being and thereby into the nature of the developing child. For pedagogical artists, such insights are quite practical in that they enable us to guide this human material into life in a fruitful way. From what I have already indicated, you can see that the question I posed in the first lecture can be at least partially answered. I believe that question is particularly important for today’s teachers. The question is: How is it that we have, on the one hand, such a wonderful science of teaching, with all its well-thought-out principles and, on the other hand, so much justifiable public criticism of education and current teaching methods?","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"III. Understanding the Human Being: A Foundation for Education","site_heading":null,"date":"1920-04-22","location":null,"word_count":122,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/301/1920-04-22/p003","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Ruth Pusch and Gertrude Teutsch","identified_edition":"AP2001","book_title":"The Renewal of Education","publisher":"Anthroposophic Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA301/English/AP2001/19200422d01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/301/1920-04-22/p003"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/301/1920-04-22/p003","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1920-04-22","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 301/1920-04-22/p003","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/301/1920-04-22/p003"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":327,"en_words":261,"ratio":0.8,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 301/1920-04-22/p003","passage_number":3,"text":"Sie werden gesehen haben, daß meine Bemühungen dahin gehen, einen Einblick in die Wesenheit des Menschen und damit in die Wesenheit des werdenden Kindes zu gewinnen, der es dann möglich macht, praktisch zu handhaben dasjenige, was notwendig ist, wenn man die Aufgabe hat, als pädagogischer Künstler das Menschenmaterial wirklich in gedeihlicher Art dem Leben entgegenzuführen. Sie können ja schon aus den Andeutungen, die ich bisher zu geben in der Lage war, ersehen, daß die Frage, die ich im ersten Vortrage aufgeworfen habe, in einer gewissen Weise sich schon jetzt, wenigstens teilweise, beantworten läßt. Diese Frage ist ja, wie ich glaube, für den gegenwärtigen Pädagogen von einer ganz besonderen Wichtigkeit. Es ist die Frage: Wie kommt es denn eigentlich, daß wir auf der einen Seite eine ausgezeichnete wissenschaftliche Pädagogik haben, das heißt, den Niederschlag der Prinzipien ausgezeichneter pädagogischer Genies, und daß wir doch über die weitesten Kreise hin berechtigte Kritiken der pädagogischen Kunst, der Handhabung dieser pädagogischen Wissenschaft in der Gegenwart haben? Es kommt dies daher, daß wir zwar aus den Prinzipien, welche aus einer gewissen instinktiven Intuition durch pädagogische Genies gegeben werden, die abstrakten Hinweise haben, wie man sich verhalten soll als Pädagoge; daß aber dieser Sammlung von Prinzipien in dieser abgelaufenen Zeit, in der unsere ganze Weltanschauung davon durchdrungen worden ist, dieser pädagogischen Wissenschaft nicht in gleichem Sinne eine wirkliche Einsicht in die Menschennatur gegenüberstand. Aus der Naturwissenschaft, wie sie getrieben worden ist - man braucht nicht ihre großen Fortschritte, ihre ungeheuren Triumphe zu verkennen -, läßt sich nicht eine pädagogische Kunst unmittelbar gewinnen. Dazu ist notwendig, daß man von ganz anderen Gesichtspunkten aus in das Wesen des werdenden Menschen eindringe. Und so kann man sagen, daß vor allen Dingen die Naturwissenschaft, die theoretisch geblieben ist, die einen Gegensatz geschaffen hat zwischen dem äußeren Leiblichen und dem Geistig-Seelischen, keine Unterstützung, keine Hilfe leistete für die ausgezeichneten pädagogischen Grundsätze, und daß daher diese pädagogischen Grundsätze bisher darauf angewiesen waren, von besonders veranlagten Pädagogen instinktiv angewendet zu werden.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":327,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/301/1920-04-22/p003"}],"english":["GA 301/1920-04-22/p003","GA 301/1920-04-22/p004"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":327,"en_words":261,"ratio":0.8,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.89,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":5026,"original_word_count":5630,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Ruth Pusch and Gertrude Teutsch","identified_edition":"AP2001","book_title":"The Renewal of Education","publisher":"Anthroposophic Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA301/English/AP2001/19200422d01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 301/1920-04-22/p003"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}