{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p005-p006","extent":"range","passage_number":5,"through":6,"paragraph_count":2,"first_locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p005","last_locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p006","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"title":"Lecture VIII","date":"1920-10-03","location":null,"alignment_confidence":"medium","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Frederick Amrine and Konrad Oberhuber","identified_edition":"AP1983","book_title":"The Boundaries of Natural Science","publisher":"Anthroposophic Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA322/English/AP1983/19201003p01.html","evidence":"lecture_list_row","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"other_renderings":{"loci":[{"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03","ga":"322","lecture":"1920-10-03","kind":"renderings","relation":"another translation or transcription of the same lecture"}],"note":"The same lecture is also served at the loci listed, each with how it relates to this one. They are ONE witness, not independent attestations: quote the rendering you fetched, and do not cite another as corroborating it. Wording differs between translations, so a quotation found in one need not occur in the other."},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.02,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":6201,"original_word_count":6102,"may_be_abridged":false},"site_heading":"Western Spiritual Science: Imagination, Inspiration, and Intuition","site_heading_note":"A heading the site wrote for this unit from a summary of it; not in the edition, and not the words of Rudolf Steiner or of the translator. Cite the unit by its title and locus, never by this heading, and do not quote it.","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p005-p006","json_url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p005-p006.json","lecture_url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/322/1920-10-03_02#p005","word_count":362,"quote_safe":true,"passages":[{"passage_number":5,"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p005","text":"In a sense, the book is only a kind of musical score that one must read with inner thought activity in order to progress, as the result of one's own efforts, from one thought to the next. The book constantly presupposes the mental collaboration of the reader. Moreover, the book presupposes that which the soul becomes in the process of such mental exertion. Anyone who has really worked through this book with his own inner thinking activity and cannot confess that he has come to know himself in a part of his inner life in which he had not known himself previously has not read *Philosophy of Freedom* properly. One should feel that one is being lifted out of one's usual thinking [ *Vorstellen*] into a thinking independent of the senses [ *ein sinnlichkeitsfreies Denken*], in which one is fully immersed, so that one feels free of the conditions of physical existence. Whoever cannot confess this to himself has actually misunderstood the book. One should be able to say to oneself: now I know, as a result of the inner thought activity I myself have expended, what pure thinking actually is.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":191,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p005","unit_kind":{"kind":"second_translation","base_unit":"GA 322/1920-10-03","note":"A second English translation of the same lecture as 1920-10-03. The German served under this id repeats the German of 1920-10-03: one German text, to be cited at 1920-10-03.","same_lecture_as":"GA 322/1920-10-03","german_repeats":"GA 322/1920-10-03"},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1920-10-03_02","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p004","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p004"}],"bead_confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":410,"en_words":395,"ratio":0.96,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Frederick Amrine and Konrad Oberhuber","identified_edition":"AP1983","book_title":"The Boundaries of Natural Science","publisher":"Anthroposophic Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA322/English/AP1983/19201003p01.html","evidence":"lecture_list_row","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p004"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"medium","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}},{"passage_number":6,"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p006","text":"The strange thing is that most Western philosophers totally deny the reality of the very thing that my *Philosophy of Freedom* seeks to awaken as something real in the soul of the reader. Countless philosophers have expounded the view that pure thinking does not exist but is bound to contain traces, however diluted, of sense perception. A strong impression is left that philosophers who maintain this have never really studied mathematics or gone into the difference between analytical and empirical mechanics. Specialization, however, has already grown to such an extent that nowadays philosophy is often pursued by people totally lacking any knowledge of mathematical thinking. The pursuit of philosophy is actually impossible without a grasp of at least the spirit of mathematical thinking. We have seen what Goethe's attitude was toward this spirit of mathematical thinking, even though he made no claim himself to any special training in mathematics. Many thus would deny the existence of the very faculty I would like those who study *The Philosophy of Freedom* to acquire.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":171,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p006","unit_kind":{"kind":"second_translation","base_unit":"GA 322/1920-10-03","note":"A second English translation of the same lecture as 1920-10-03. The German served under this id repeats the German of 1920-10-03: one German text, to be cited at 1920-10-03.","same_lecture_as":"GA 322/1920-10-03","german_repeats":"GA 322/1920-10-03"},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1920-10-03_02","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p005","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p005"}],"bead_confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":201,"en_words":171,"ratio":0.85,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Frederick Amrine and Konrad Oberhuber","identified_edition":"AP1983","book_title":"The Boundaries of Natural Science","publisher":"Anthroposophic Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA322/English/AP1983/19201003p01.html","evidence":"lecture_list_row","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p005"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"medium","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}],"witnesses":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"first_passage":1,"last_passage":19,"passage_count":19,"word_count":6102},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"first_passage":1,"last_passage":20,"passage_count":20,"word_count":6201,"completeness":{"ratio":1.02,"band":"comparable","note":null}}],"aligned_witness":{"status":"aligned","lang":"de","edition":"original","confidence":"medium","passages":[{"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p004","passage_number":4,"text":"In meinem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» ist zwar durchaus ein sicherer Weg in die übersinnlichen Gebiete hinein charakterisiert, aber er ist so charakterisiert, daß er gewissermaßen für jedermann taugt, daß er vor allen Dingen für diejenigen taugt, welche nicht durch ein eigentliches wissenschaftliches Leben hindurchgegangen sind. Ich will ihn heute im Speziellen so charakterisieren, wie er eben mehr für den Wissenschafter taugt. Für diesen Wissenschafter muß ich auch nach allen meinen Erfahrungen als eine Art Voraussetzung ansehen — wir werden gleich nachher hören, in welchem Sinne das gemeint ist —, ich muß ansehen als eine richtige Voraussetzung dieses Erkenntnisweges das Verfolgen dessen, was in meiner «Philosophie der Freiheit» dargestellt ist. Diese «Philosophie der Freiheit» ist ja nicht in der Absicht geschrieben, in der heute zumeist Bücher geschrieben werden. Heute werden Bücher geschrieben zu dem Ziele, daß der Betreffende sich über den Inhalt des Mitgeteilten einfach informiert, daß er nach seinen besonderen Vorkenntnissen, nach seiner Bildung oder seiner wissenschaftlichen Kultur eben Kenntnis nimmt von dem, was inhaltlich in einem Buche enthalten ist. So ist eigentlich im Grunde genommen meine «Philosophie der Freiheit» nicht gemeint. Daher wird sie auch von denjenigen nicht gerade geliebt, die von einem Buche nur Kenntnis nehmen wollen. Meine «Philosophie der Freiheit» ist so gemeint, daß man zur unmittelbaren eigenen Denktätigkeit Seite für Seite greifen muß, daß gewissermaßen das Buch selbst nur eine Art Partitur ist und man in innerer Denktätigkeit diese Partitur lesen muß, um fortwährend aus dem Eigenen heraus von Gedanke zu Gedanke fortzuschreiten. So daß bei diesem Buch durchaus immer mit der gedanklichen Mitarbeit des Lesers gerechnet ist. Und es ist ferner gerechnet mit demjenigen, was aus der Seele wird, wenn sie eine solche Gedankenarbeit mitmacht. Derjenige, der sich nicht gesteht, daß, wenn er dieses Buch nun wirklich in eigener seelischer Gedankenarbeit absolviert hat, er dann gewissermaßen sich in einem Elemente des Seelenlebens erfaßt hat, in dem er sich früher nicht erfaßt hat; derjenige, der nicht spürt, daß er gewissermaßen herausgehoben ist aus seinem gewöhnlichen Vorstellen in ein sinnlichkeitsfreies Denken, in dem man sich ganz bewegt, so daß man erfühlt, wie man in diesem Denken frei geworden ist von den Bedingungen der Leiblichkeit, der liest eigentlich diese «Philosophie der Freiheit» nicht im richtigen Sinne. Und der versteht sie im Grunde genommen nicht richtig, der sich dies nicht gestehen kann. Man muß gewissermaßen sich sagen können: Jetzt weiß ich durch diese seelische Gedankenarbeit, die ich verrichtet habe, was eigentlich reines Denken ist.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":410,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p004"},{"locus":"GA 322/1920-10-03_02/p005","passage_number":5,"text":"Es ist ja das Eigentümliche, daß dasjenige, was gerade in der Seele real werden soll beim Verfolgen meiner «Philosophie der Freiheit», von den meisten Philosophen des Abendlandes überhaupt in seiner Realität geleugnet wird. Sie finden bei zahlreichen Philosophen Ausführungen darüber, daß es ja ein reines Denken gar nicht gäbe, daß alles Denken immer erfüllt sein müsse mit Resten wenigstens, wenn auch noch so sehr verdünnten Resten der sinnlichen Anschauung. Man müßte allerdings glauben, daß solche Philosophen niemals wirklich Mathematik studiert haben, sich niemals eingelassen haben auf den Unterschied zwischen der analytischen Mechanik und der empirischen Mechanik, die so etwas behaupten. Allein es ist ja schon durch unseren Spezialismus einmal so weit gekommen, daß man heute oftmals philosophiert, ohne überhaupt die Spur von einer Erkenntnis des mathematischen Denkens zu haben. Im Grunde genommen kann man nicht philosophieren, ohne wenigstens den Geist des mathematischen Denkens erfaßt zu haben. Wir haben gesehen, wie Goethe gegenüber diesem Geiste des mathematischen Denkens sich verhielt, wenn er auch selber sagte, daß er sich keine besondere, speziell-mathematische Kultur zuschreiben könne. Also es wird eigentlich von vielen geleugnet, daß es das gibt, von dem ich gerade möchte, daß man es sich aneignet durch das Studium der «Philosophie der Freiheit».","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":201,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/322/1920-10-03_02/p005"}],"beads":[{"from":[4,5],"to":[4],"confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"proposed"},{"from":[6],"to":[5],"confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"proposed"}],"note":"Paired by the paragraph aligner; each language numbers its own paragraphs. A bead at either end of the span can carry text beyond it (the `from` numbers show what each bead covers)."}}