{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 343/gnostics_and_montanists/p038","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"If you now look at all of this, what appears in programs about such people as Johannes Valentin Andrea, Comenius, what lives in the Bohemian brothers, then you will understand how in the later centuries of the crusades the pursuit of internalization has gone. I must at least mention the most symptomatic picture seemed to me always to be in a single place when I looked at this lonely thinker who lived in Bohemia, the contemporary of Leibniz, Franziskus Josephus von Hoditz und Wolframitz. For the first time, in all clarity—we don't only know this today—he stripped morality of legality. Everywhere in the early days of writing in the Roman spirit, the legal was bound to the moral. What lived in a religious way in most people, lived in a philosophic way in the contemporaries of Leibniz. He wanted the moral element to be purely philosophic. Just like Luther wanted to get the inner justification, because in his time it was no longer possible to get justification in the outer world, so Franziskus Josephus von Hoditz und Wolframitz as a lonely thinker, saw the task: How do I save, purely conceptually, morality from the encirclement and transformation of legality, with those poor philosophic concepts? How do I save the purely human-moral?—He didn't deepen the question religiously. The question was not one-sidedly, intellectually posed by Hoditz—Wolframitz. However, just because it is put philosophically, one notices how he struggles philosophically in the pure shaping of the substantial moral content living in the consciousness.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"XIV. Gnostics and Montanists","site_heading":null,"date":"1921-10-03","location":null,"word_count":251,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/343/gnostics_and_montanists/p038","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Hanna von Maltitz","identified_edition":"SOL2018","book_title":"The Foundation Course","publisher":"Steiner Online Library","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA343/English/SOL2018/Lecture_14_4616a.html","evidence":"lecture_list_row","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/343/gnostics_and_montanists/p038","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"gnostics_and_montanists","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 343/gnostics_and_montanists/p026","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/343/gnostics_and_montanists/p026"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":265,"en_words":251,"ratio":0.95,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 343/gnostics_and_montanists/p026","passage_number":26,"text":"Und sehen Sie sich dann alles dasjenige an, was über die damalige zivilisierte Welt wie in Programmen zunächst erscheint in solchen Leuten wie Johannes Valentin Andreä, Comenius, was in den böhmischen Brüdern lebt, dann werden Sie verstehen, wie in den späteren Jahrhunderten aus den Kreuzzügen heraus das Streben nach Verinnerlichung gegangen ist. Ich muß sagen, am meisten schien es mir immer an einer einzelnen Stelle symptomatisch abgebildet, wenn ich hingeschaut habe auf diesen einsamen Denker, der in Böhmen lebte und ein Zeitgenosse von Leibniz war, Franziskus Josephus von Hoditz und Wolframitz. Er hat zum ersten Male mit aller Klarheit — das weiß man nur heute nicht — abgeschält das Moralische von dem Juristischen. Überall in der früheren Schriftstellerei war in ganz römischem Geiste das Juristische mit dem Moralischen verbunden. Das, was auf religiöse Art in allen den Leuten lebte, das lebte sich in philosophischer Art in diesem Zeitgenossen des Leibniz aus. Er will philosophisch das Moralische rein hinstellen. Und wie Luther sich die innere Rechtfertigung verschaffen wollte, weil in seiner Zeit es nicht mehr möglich war, die Rechtfertigung durch die äußere Welt zu finden, so sah Franziskus Josephus von Hoditz und Wolframitz als einsamer Denker die Aufgabe: Wie rette ich rein begrifflich das Moralische heraus aus der Umzingelung und Umspannung [durch das Juristische] mit jenen armen philosophischen Begriffen, wie rette ich das rein Menschlich-Moralische? — Die Frage vertieft sich ihm nicht religiös, die Frage wird nicht einseitig intellektualistisch gestellt bei Hoditz-Wolframitz. Aber gerade dadurch, daß sie philosophisch gestellt wird, merkt man, wie er philosophisch ringt nach einer reinen Herausgestaltung des im Bewußtsein lebenden moralisch-substantiellen Inhaltes.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":265,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/343/gnostics_and_montanists/p026"}],"english":["GA 343/gnostics_and_montanists/p038"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":265,"en_words":251,"ratio":0.95,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.99,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":6323,"original_word_count":6411,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Hanna von Maltitz","identified_edition":"SOL2018","book_title":"The Foundation Course","publisher":"Steiner Online Library","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA343/English/SOL2018/Lecture_14_4616a.html","evidence":"lecture_list_row","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 343/gnostics_and_montanists/p026"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}