IV. Theosophy and Christianity

GA 52/1904-01-04/p018 ·1904-01-04 · English HighHigh alignmentThis translation's paragraph count matches the German original — the locus maps cleanly to the same paragraph in DE.
Record: unknown. How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.

This sheds the right light on the Gospel of Matthew. Now we understand why the birth of Christ is called “of God.” This best refutes what David Friedrich Strauss wants. Not the entire human race was able to receive Christ within themselves, even though he was for the entire human race and for all humanity. And now one was to come who once represented within himself the fullness of the infinity of the Spirit. This gave this personality its unique significance for the first Christian teachers, who understood what it was all about. They understood that it was neither an abstract, shadowy concept nor a single human being in his actuality, but truly and really the God-man, an individual personality in the fullness of truth.

Read this passage in another edition
DEoriginalENEnglish
Raw JSON: /v1/steiner/en/ga/52/1904-01-04/p018.json
Cite: GA 52/1904-01-04/p018 · edition English