Second Lecture

GA 78/1921-08-30/p013 ·1921-08-30 · English HighHigh alignmentThis translation's paragraph count matches the German original — the locus maps cleanly to the same paragraph in DE.
Record: unknown. How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.

If we now take a look at how Goethe approached this task, we will notice that he made many attempts to write a kind of metamorphosis of animal organs. He conducted an immeasurable number of studies in order to write such a metamorphosis of animals; but one will not find that any of these studies even remotely approaches what he had achieved with his metamorphosis of plants. And one can also see how Goethe repeatedly began to expand the theory of metamorphosis, at least in the field of osteology. But he always stopped before going any further. All these things remained fragments. He could not reach the point where his thinking, as an inner soul life, would have become so animated that it could also have submerged itself in animality, as in plant life and its transformations. And so, precisely in the study of Goethe, the great question arose about the nature and ways of human cognition in general, and here lies historically — at least for me — one of the roots of anthroposophy.

Read this passage in another edition
DEoriginalENEnglish
Raw JSON: /v1/steiner/en/ga/78/1921-08-30/p013.json
Cite: GA 78/1921-08-30/p013 · edition English