{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 81/1922-03-07/p026","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"We see recently—as with Oswald Külpe—how it has happened that philosophy, when it was already lost, is no more than a summary of the individual sciences. From inorganic science you can ask—what are the concepts? From organic science you can ask—what are the concepts? Likewise with history, with the science of religion, and so on. One collects these concepts and forms a separate abstract unit. I would like to say that the subject of the teaching in the separate sciences should create the totality of teaching. This is what the science in the Middle must basically come to after the entire assessment.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"3. Anthroposophy and Philosophy","site_heading":null,"date":"1922-03-07","location":null,"word_count":102,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/81/1922-03-07/p026","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Hanna von Maltitz","identified_edition":"eLib2018","book_title":"The Impulse for Renewal in Culture and Science","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA081/English/eLib2018/19220307p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line"},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/81/1922-03-07/p026"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/81/1922-03-07/p026","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1922-03-07","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 81/1922-03-07/p020","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/81/1922-03-07/p020"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":276,"en_words":271,"ratio":0.98,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 81/1922-03-07/p020","passage_number":20,"text":"Wenn ich das bildlich zusammenfassen soll, was ich ausgeführt habe, so möchte ich sagen: In Solowjew spricht philosophisch gesehen der alte Priester, der in höheren Welten lebte und eine Art innerer Fähigkeiten zu entwickeln hatte, in diesen höheren Welten zu leben; priesterliche Sprache, nur ins Philosophische umgesetzt, fühlt man überall bei Solowjew. Im Westen, bei Herbert Spencer, spricht der Weltmann, der sich in die Lebenspraxis hineinschicken will, der — wie es ja aus der darwinistischen Theorie hervorgehen kann —- die Wissenschaft so ausbilden will, daß sie die praktische Lebensgrundlage ergeben kann. In der Mitte haben wir weder den Weltmann noch den Priester; Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, sie sind keine priesterlichen Naturen wie etwa Solowjew. In der Mitte haben wir den Lehrer, den Volkspädagogen, und zwar auch da, wo die deutsche Philosophie etwa hervorgegangen ist aus der religiösen Vertiefung; da ist der Pastor wiederum zum Lehrer geworden. Das Lehrhafte haftet auch der Hegelschen Philosophie an. Und wir sehen in der neuesten Zeit — etwa bei Oswald Külpe —, wie die Sache so geworden ist, daß nun die Philosophie, als man sie eigentlich schon verloren hatte, nichts mehr ist als eine Zusammenfassung dessen, was die einzelnen Wissenschaften geben. Man fragt bei der unorganischen Naturwissenschaft: was kommen da für Begriffe hervor?, man fragt bei der organischen Naturwissenschaft: was kommen da für Begriffe hervor?, bei der Geschichte, bei der Religionswissenschaft ebenso, und so weiter. Man sammelt diese Begriffe und bildet damit äußerlich abstrakt eine Einheit. Ich möchte sagen, was Gegenstand der Lehre in den einzelnen Wissenschaften ist, soll eine Gesamtlehre bilden. Das ist es, wozu im Grunde genommen die Wissenschaft in der Mitte nach der ganzen Veranlagung der Menschen gelangen mußte.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":276,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/81/1922-03-07/p020"}],"english":["GA 81/1922-03-07/p025","GA 81/1922-03-07/p026"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":276,"en_words":271,"ratio":0.98,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.98,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":5108,"original_word_count":5205,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Hanna von Maltitz","identified_edition":"eLib2018","book_title":"The Impulse for Renewal in Culture and Science","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA081/English/eLib2018/19220307p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line"},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 81/1922-03-07/p020"],"missing_from_translation":["Fichte"],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","bead_length_ratio":0.98,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}