{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 87/1902-04-26/p015","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"What was probably still present in the Gnostics of the first centuries and what the Christian Church has not preserved is completely missing in [Augustine]: the awareness of a pervasive individuality and any mention of transmigration. Nothing is interposed between personality and divinity. Augustine had to attribute every human peculiarity to the will of the Godhead, so to speak. He could say nothing [else], since he knew nothing of a pervasive individuality. That which appears in me as my own personality is the result of that which reaches out backwards and forwards. But [Augustine] must trace this back to the will of the Godhead. Thus we create a boundary between the Godhead and the will of the individual. And this is how the [so-called predestination] controversy arises. On the one hand, we have those who are saved, and on the other, those who are not allowed to enter divinity: despite the immense love, the realization of the terrible. In other words, dualism.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"24. On Scotus Eriugena","site_heading":null,"date":"1902-04-26","location":null,"word_count":162,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/87/1902-04-26/p015","alignment_confidence":"medium","alignment_reason":"beads:identity","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"Steiner Online Library","identified_edition":"SOL2024","book_title":"Ancient Mysteries and Christianity","publisher":"Steiner Online Library","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA087/English/SOL2024/19020426p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/87/1902-04-26/p015"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/87/1902-04-26/p015","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"listeners_notes","scope":"volume","note":"Written from listeners' notes, summaries, or memory rather than a shorthand transcript. The wording is the note-taker's as much as Steiner's: weigh a single striking phrase here far more cautiously than the same phrase in a stenographic volume, and do not rest an argument on one word.","evidence":"Auch wenn die Mitschrift noch nicht die später übliche Genauigkeit aufweist","evidence_translation":"Even though the transcript does not yet have the accuracy usual later","evidence_source":"The publisher's description of the volume, as mirrored on AnthroWiki (GA 87), which calls the cycle the earliest of which a listener's transcript exists. The translation is the maintainer's, not a published one."},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1902-04-26","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 87/1902-04-26/p015","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/87/1902-04-26/p015"}],"bead_confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"verified","verified":true,"evidence":["length","meaning","audit"],"length_check":{"de_words":154,"en_words":162,"ratio":1.05,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 87/1902-04-26/p015","passage_number":15,"text":"Bei [Augustinus] fehlt vollständig, was bei den Gnostikern der ersten Jahrhunderte wahrscheinlich noch vorhanden war, und was die christliche Kirche nicht bewahrt hat: das Bewusstsein von einer durchgreifenden Individualität und jede Bemerkung von einer Seelenwanderung. Zwischen der Persönlichkeit und der Gottheit ist nichts eingeschoben. Augustinus musste jede menschliche Eigentümlichkeit sozusagen auf den Willen der Gottheit zurückführen. Er konnte nichts [anderes] sagen, da er nichts von einer durchgreifenden Individualität wusste. Das, was in mir als eigene Persönlichkeit auftritt, ist das Ergebnis dessen, was nach rückwärts und nach vorwärts ausgreift. Das muss [Augustinus] aber auf den Willen der Gottheit zurückführen. So schen wir eine Grenze zwischen der Gottheit und dem Willen des Einzelnen. Und so entsteht der [sogenannte Prädestinations-]Streit. Wir haben da auf der einen Seite diejenigen, welche selig werden, und auf der anderen Seite diejenigen, welchen das Eindringen in die Göttlichkeit nicht ermöglicht wird: trotz der ungeheuren Liebe auch die Durchführung des Furchtbaren. Also Dualismus.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":154,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/87/1902-04-26/p015"}],"english":["GA 87/1902-04-26/p015"],"method":"identity","confidence":"medium","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":154,"en_words":162,"ratio":1.05,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"verified","verified":true,"evidence":["length","meaning","audit"]},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.04,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":3581,"original_word_count":3431,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"Steiner Online Library","identified_edition":"SOL2024","book_title":"Ancient Mysteries and Christianity","publisher":"Steiner Online Library","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA087/English/SOL2024/19020426p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 87/1902-04-26/p015"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":["Christ"],"bead_confidence":"medium","bead_length_ratio":1.05,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}