{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 92/1907-12-02/p041","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"But later on, a different principle began to hold sway—the principle of *individual independence*. In the age preceding that of Christendom these two streams were present: the stream expressed in love bound up with the blood-tie, and the principle of independence, freedom. The former represented the power of *Jehovah*, whose name means “I am the I am,” and the latter the *Luciferic* principle of independence. Christianity was to bring into the world a love that is independent of blood-kinship. The words of Christ are to be interpreted thus: He who forsakes not father and mother—that is to say, he who cannot substitute for a love that is bound up with flesh and blood, a love that flows from soul to soul, from brother to sister, from a man to all men—he “cannot be my disciple.”","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"Richard Wagner and Mysticism","site_heading":null,"date":"1907-12-02","location":null,"word_count":135,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/92/1907-12-02/p041","alignment_confidence":"medium","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"not_established","translator":null,"identified_edition":"Singles","book_title":"Richard Wagner and Mysticism","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA092/English/Singles/19071202p01.html","evidence":null,"reason":"source_says_translator_unknown","note":"The source page itself says the translator is unknown. No translator is established for this lecture: nothing at the level of the lecture names one. Do not attribute this English to a translator, and do not borrow a credit from another lecture of the volume. Cite the German for anything load-bearing."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/92/1907-12-02/p041"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/92/1907-12-02/p041","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"listeners_notes","scope":"volume","note":"Written from listeners' notes, summaries, or memory rather than a shorthand transcript. The wording is the note-taker's as much as Steiner's: weigh a single striking phrase here far more cautiously than the same phrase in a stenographic volume, and do not rest an argument on one word.","evidence":"Sechzehn Vorträge, gehalten in Berlin, Köln und Nürnberg in den Jahren 1904, 1905 und 1907 (Hörernotizen)","evidence_translation":"Sixteen lectures, given in Berlin, Cologne and Nuremberg in 1904, 1905 and 1907 (listeners' notes)","evidence_source":"The volume's subtitle as given in the publisher's description, mirrored on AnthroWiki (GA 92); the 2022 catalogue's subtitle omits it. The translation is the maintainer's, not a published one."},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1907-12-02","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 92/1907-12-02/p038","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/92/1907-12-02/p038"},{"locus":"GA 92/1907-12-02/p039","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/92/1907-12-02/p039"}],"bead_confidence":"medium","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":279,"en_words":295,"ratio":1.06,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 92/1907-12-02/p038","passage_number":38,"text":"Fassen wir noch einmal das ganze Geheimnis dieses Mythos: ein Zusammenklang mit den Fortschritten der Menschheitsentwicklung, wie ihn sich die, die vom Geheimnis des Grals wissen, vorstellen. Sie sagen: Als die Menschheitsentwicklung auf der Erde begann, war alle Liebe noch gebunden an das Blut. Die Blutsverwandtschaft war es, die die Menschen verband. Wir finden da kleine Stämme und finden, daß in diesen die Nahehe herrscht. Später erst kam die Fernehe. Der Zeitpunkt, von dem an herausgeheiratet werden darf aus dem Stamm, bildet einen wichtigen Übergang im Leben eines jeden Volkes.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":90,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/92/1907-12-02/p038"},{"locus":"GA 92/1907-12-02/p039","passage_number":39,"text":"In den Sagen und Mythen ist das Bewußtsein davon erhalten. Zuerst war also die Liebe gebunden an die Blutsverwandtschaft; dann wurden die Kreise weiter und weiter, innerhalb welcher man sich heiratete. Das ist der eine Strom der Entwicklung: die Liebe, die gebunden ist an die Gleichheit und Gemeinschaft von Fleisch und Blut. Dann wird ein anderes Prinzip maßgebend, das die Selbständigkeit einpflanzt. In jener alten Zeit, die dem Christentum vorangegangen ist — so sagten die Gralsritter -, waren diese zwei Strömungen: die Blutbruderschaftsliebe und das Freiheitsprinzip, das, was in dem Menschen waltet als Selbständiges, als Luziferisches, die Macht des Jahve, dessen Name bedeutet: Ich bin, der ich bin. - Mit dem Christentum sollte in die Welt gebracht werden eine Liebe, die unabhängig ist von Blutbruderschaft. So ist der Ausspruch Christi zu deuten: Wer nicht verlässet Vater und Mutter, der kann nicht mein Jünger sein. - Das heißt: Wer nicht an die Stelle einer Liebe, die an Blut und Fleisch gebunden ist, zu setzen vermag die allgemeine Menschenliebe, die von Seele zu Seele geht, von Mensch zu Mensch überhaupt, die sich allmählich herausbilden muß, der kann nicht mein Jünger sein.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":189,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/92/1907-12-02/p039"}],"english":["GA 92/1907-12-02/p040","GA 92/1907-12-02/p041"],"method":"length","confidence":"medium","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":279,"en_words":295,"ratio":1.06,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":0.99,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":6744,"original_word_count":6808,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"not_established","translator":null,"identified_edition":"Singles","book_title":"Richard Wagner and Mysticism","publisher":null,"publisher_inferred":false,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA092/English/Singles/19071202p01.html","evidence":null,"reason":"source_says_translator_unknown","note":"The source page itself says the translator is unknown. No translator is established for this lecture: nothing at the level of the lecture names one. Do not attribute this English to a translator, and do not borrow a credit from another lecture of the volume. Cite the German for anything load-bearing.","warning":"No translator is recorded for this edition. An unattributed translation cannot be weighed as a witness: you cannot tell which hand made the choices in it. Cite the German for anything load-bearing."},"entity_parity":{"status":"discrepancy","checked_against":["GA 92/1907-12-02/p038","GA 92/1907-12-02/p039"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":["Christ"],"bead_confidence":"medium","bead_length_ratio":1.06,"likely_cause":"unresolved","note":"NAME MISMATCH between this English passage and its German counterpart. A name the German carries is absent here (or a name appears here that the German does not carry). Two things cause this and they need telling apart: the translation really drops or reassigns what the original distinguishes, OR the paragraph alignment paired the wrong passages. `bead_confidence` does NOT settle which: this corpus's embedding aligner pairs topically-related paragraphs at full confidence, and a sampled high-confidence mismatch proved to be a wrong pairing. Read the German passages listed and confirm they are counterparts BEFORE drawing any conclusion about the translation."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}