{"corpus":"steiner","locus":"GA 93/1906-01-02/p096","lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"text":"For this it is necessary to answer the question—and that brings us back to our starting point—‘What was the Royal Art up till now?’ The Royal Art was the soul of our culture. And this culture of ours has two basic ingredients. On the one hand, it is built up by those forces in the human soul which concern themselves with the inanimate; and on the other hand, by the forces of those people who make it their principal task to control the inanimate simply bv means of the forces summoned up by their organism; and they are the men, hence the Royal Art has hitherto been a male art. Women were therefore excluded and could not take part in it. The tasks carried on in the Lodges were set apart, kept separate—the details do not matter—from everything related to the family or to the reproduction of the purely natural basis of the human race.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"title":"20. The Royal Art in a New Form","site_heading":null,"date":"1906-01-02","location":null,"word_count":155,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/93/1906-01-02/p096","alignment_confidence":"high","alignment_reason":"beads:length","two_voice_volume":false,"translation_credit":{"scope":"unit","status":"established","translator":"John M. Wood","identified_edition":"RSP1985","book_title":"The Temple Legend","publisher":"Rudolf Steiner Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA093/English/RSP1985/19060102p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"edition_coverage":{"de":["original"],"en":["English"]},"available_versions":[{"lang":"de","edition":"original","edition_basis":null,"is_original":true,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/93/1906-01-02/p096"},{"lang":"en","edition":"English","edition_basis":null,"is_original":false,"is_default_edition":true,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/en/ga/93/1906-01-02/p096","paragraph_aligned":true}],"record":{"record_type":"unknown","scope":"volume","note":"How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.","evidence":null,"evidence_translation":null,"evidence_source":null},"german_anchor":{"de_prefix":"1906-01-02","de_passages":[{"locus":"GA 93/1906-01-02/p098","url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/93/1906-01-02/p098"}],"bead_confidence":"high","pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false,"length_check":{"de_words":261,"en_words":271,"ratio":1.04,"partial":false},"correspondence":"established","note":"English passage numbering is edition-relative, so the same number need not name the same paragraph in the German. The German original passage(s) above are the edition-invariant anchor — fetch them (lang='de') to verify wording before quoting across editions."},"paired_german":{"status":"paired","german":[{"locus":"GA 93/1906-01-02/p098","passage_number":98,"text":"Dazu ist notwendig — was uns zum Ausgangspunkte wieder zurückführt — die Frage zu beantworten: Was war die königliche Kunst bisher? — Diese königliche Kunst war bisher die Seele unserer Kultur. Und diese unsere Kultur hat zwei Grundeigenschaften. Einerseits ist sie aufgebaut auf diejenigen Kräfte in der menschlichen Seele, welche sich mit dem Unlebendigen beschäftigen, und andererseits auf diejenigen Kräfte unter den Menschen, die vorzugsweise dieses Bemeistern des Unlebendigen sich zu ihrer Aufgabe machen einfach vermittels der durch ihren Organismus hervorgerufenen Kräfte: das sind die Männer. Daher war die königliche Kunst bisher eine Männerkunst. Die Frauen waren daher ausgeschlossen und konnten nicht daran teilnehmen. Abgesondert, getrennt wurden die Arbeiten in den Logen verrichtet - wie im einzelnen, darauf kommt es nicht an - von dem, was sich auf die Familie, die Fortpflanzung der reinen Naturgrundlage des Menschengeschlechtes bezieht. In der Freimaurerei wurde daher ein Doppelleben geführt: die großen Ideen, die in der Loge zum Ausdruck kamen, durften nicht verquickt werden mit dem, was im Zusammenhange mit der Familie steht. Die Logenarbeit, als sich auf das innerste Seelenleben beziehend, lief neben der Pflege des Zusammenlebens in der Familie einher. Im Kampfe lag die eine Strömung mit der anderen. Ausgeschlossen waren die Frauen von der Maurerei. Das hörte in dem Augenblicke auf, als die Freimaurerei nicht mehr nach rückwärts schaute, sondern den Blick vorwärts richtete. Denn gerade dasjenige wurde als weibliche Strömung bezeichnet, was von außen [?] zufloß; dasjenige wurde von der Maurerei als etwas Priesterliches bezeichnet, was von Natur aus da war. Und das sah das Maurerische bisher als das Feindliche an.","text_trust":"verbatim","quote_safe":true,"word_count":261,"url":"https://anthroposophy.ai/v1/steiner/de/ga/93/1906-01-02/p098"}],"english":["GA 93/1906-01-02/p096","GA 93/1906-01-02/p097"],"method":"length","confidence":"high","correspondence":"established","length_check":{"de_words":261,"en_words":271,"ratio":1.04,"partial":false},"pairing_state":"proposed","verified":false},"witness_completeness":{"ratio":1.23,"band":"comparable","note":null,"word_count":13461,"original_word_count":10911,"may_be_abridged":false},"witness_quality":{"translator":{"scope":"unit","status":"recorded","translator":"John M. Wood","identified_edition":"RSP1985","book_title":"The Temple Legend","publisher":"Rudolf Steiner Press","publisher_inferred":true,"match_score":1.0,"source_url":"https://www.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA093/English/RSP1985/19060102p01.html","evidence":"lecture_page_line","publisher_note":"The publisher is inferred from the edition code in this lecture's source URL, not stated by the source page. The translator IS verified for this lecture: its own source names the translator (evidence: the lecture's page, rsarchive's lecture list, or the cover of the book it was published in), and that page's text was matched against this unit (see match_score and source_url). Cite the translator with confidence; attribute the publisher only as probable."},"entity_parity":{"status":"ok","checked_against":["GA 93/1906-01-02/p098"],"missing_from_translation":[],"present_only_in_translation":[],"bead_confidence":"high","note":"Every load-bearing name in the German counterpart appears in this English passage. That is a check on NAMES only: a translation can keep every name and still reverse who acts on whom, change a number, or soften a claim. Read the German for anything you intend to rest an argument on."},"note":"quote_safe certifies the bytes of this text. This block is about the translation as a WITNESS: who made it, and whether it carries the same names as the original. See witness_completeness for how much of the original this witness holds."}}