The History of the Esoteric School 1904–1914, Volume One

GA 264 — 14 September 1904, Berlin

To Günther Wagner in Lugano

Berlin, September 14, 1904

Dear Mr. Wagner!

It is undoubtedly true that Annie Besant's lecture “Is Theosophy Antichristian” could not be understood in the same way in Germany as in England, because in the last few decades the discussion of fundamental Christian questions in England has taken on a completely different character in the circles of theologians and those of their spiritually dependent preachers etc. than in England.

From our spiritual leaders, we constantly receive instructions to individualize with regard to the individual countries. As for our Christian propaganda in particular, it should not fly the flag of “Theosophy”. It should emanate from Theosophists, but should never say so directly. Christian mysticism, interpretation of Christian symbols, etc. should be pursued. It will certainly be our task to win preachers, even Catholic priests, for esoteric Christianity. It will then be up to them to let the esoteric flow into their teachings. We ourselves would only be opposed if we wanted to approach Christian circles directly.

In Germany, a debate about whether Theosophy is anti-Christian or not would only create new opposition to Theosophy. There is a great aversion to everything called Theosophy, especially among pastors. And it is growing rapidly. When Bresch translates the things, there is nothing we can do. Because he always makes a very specific opposition. For example, he has now objected to Annie Besant coming to Leipzig. There is nothing we can do about that; we have to let Bresch have his way. But it is up to us to do the right thing.

You see, dear Mr. Wagner, on the one hand we are to decidedly emphasize 'Theosophy and on the other hand, where this is not appropriate, we are to place the matter higher than the name and the form. We are being told: “Be Theosophists; how you are Theosophists, that you must determine yourselves.”

In my last letter I said I would “abstain from voting”. The reason for this expression was as follows. I have instructions to cultivate the Christian element, and in this particular case I could only interpret what was meant to me as meaning that the lecture should not be translated. But now my own intellectual work begins, and there I found exactly the same reason that you give. Now that you have stated it yourself, I can also say that it applies to me as well. Before that I could only say, “I cannot be in favor of it.” I am sure you will understand me. Tomorrow I will receive Mrs. Besant in Hamburg. On Friday she will be in Berlin.

Sincerely,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner

Kind regards to your esteemed wife.