Greco-Christian stream·Opera Omnia Sancti Thomae (Complete Works of Thomas Aquinas)·Summa Theologiae·Tertia Pars·Q52. Christ's descent into hell
Source context
- Theme
- Christ's descent into the sub-earthly realm between death and resurrection
Steiner
- GA 223, 1923-04-01Steiner identifies Christ's descent into hell as the necessary opposite pole to the resurrection, accomplished through Christ taking on human form and descending from divine heights into the lowest reaches of existence.
- GA 94, 1906-07-11Steiner links the descent into hell with the tearing of the temple curtain as a single initiatory event, experienced at a corresponding level by the initiate who follows the Christ-path through death.
- GA 109, 1909-06-11Steiner treats the descent into hell as carrying a specific esoteric meaning within Rosicrucian teaching on the Christ-event.
- GA 117a, 1910-01-14Steiner describes the descent into hell as a stage on the initiatory path: darkness parts and spiritual light breaks through for the one who has followed Christ to Golgotha.
Cross-tradition
- Ancient Egyptian mysteries (Osirian descent)Cross-tradition congruence: the descent of Osiris into the Duat and his reconstitution there structurally parallels the motif of a divine being penetrating the sub-earthly realm and transforming it from within.
- Greek mysteries (Orphic-Eleusinian katabasis)Cross-tradition congruence: the heroic descent of Orpheus or Heracles into Hades represents a patterned pre-figuration of a divine power acting redemptively within the realm of the dead.
Q52. Christ's descent into hell
Article 1
[III.q.52.a.1.arg.1] It would seem that it was not fitting for Christ to descend into hell, because Augustine says (Ep. ad Evod. cliv.): "Nor could I find anywhere in the Scriptures hell mentioned as something good." But Christ's soul did not descend into any evil place, for neither do the souls of the just. Therefore it does not seem fitting for Christ's soul to descend into hell.
[III.q.52.a.1.arg.2] Further, it cannot belong to Christ to descend into hell according to His Divine Nature, which is altogether immovable; but only according to His assumed nature. But that which Christ did or suffered in His assumed nature is ordained for man's salvation: and to secure this it does not seem necessary for Christ to descend into hell, since He delivered us from both guilt and penalty by His Passion which He endured in this world, as stated above (49, 1,3). Consequently, it was not fitting that Christ should descend into hell.
[III.q.52.a.1.arg.2] 2. Præterea, illud quod est contra naturam, non potest impedire illud quod est secundum naturam. Sed servitus est contra naturam, quia, sicut dicit Gregorius in Pastorali, part. II, cap. VI, col. 34, t. 3, « contra naturam est hominem homini velle dominari; » quod etiam patet ex hoc quod homini dictum est, Gen., I: Ut * præsit piscibus maris, etc., non autem ut præsit homini. Ergo non potest impedire matrimonium, quod est naturale.
[III.q.52.a.1.arg.3] Further, by Christ's death His soul was separated from His body, and this was laid in the sepulchre, as stated above (Article 51). But it seems that He descended into hell, not according to His soul only, because seemingly the soul, being incorporeal, cannot be a subject of local motion; for this belongs to bodies, as is proved in Phys. vi, text. 32; while descent implies corporeal motion. Therefore it was not fitting for Christ to descend into hell.
[III.q.52.a.1.arg.3] 3. Præterea, si impediat, aut hoc est de jure naturali, aut de jure positivo. Sed non de jure naturali, quia secundum jus naturale omnes homines sunt æquales, ut Gregorius dicit, loc. cit.; et in principio Digestorum, l. « Manumissionis, » ff. De just. et jure, dicitur quod servitus non est de jure naturali: positivum etiam jus descendit a naturali, ut Tullius dicit, lib. II De invent., aliquant. ante fin. Ergo secundum jus nullum matrimonium servitus impedire potest.
[III.q.52.a.1.sc] It is said in the Creed: "He descended into hell": and the Apostle says (Ephesians 4:9): "Now that He ascended, what is it, but because He also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?" And a gloss adds: "that is--into hell."
[III.q.52.a.1.sc] Sed contra est quod Decretalis dicit de conjugio servorum, cap. « Ad nostra, » quod « error conditionis impedit contra-hendum matrimonium et dirimit contractum. » Præterea, matrimonium est de bonis per se expetendis, inquantum habet honestatem. Sed servitus est de per se fugiendis. Ergo matrimonium et servitus sunt contraria; et sic servitus matrimonium impedit.
[III.q.52.a.1.co] It was fitting for Christ to descend into hell. First of all, because He came to bear our penalty in order to free us from penalty, according to Isaiah 53:4: "Surely He hath borne our infirmities and carried our sorrows." But through sin man had incurred not only the death of the body, but also descent into hell. Consequently since it was fitting for Christ to die in order to deliver us from death, so it was fitting for Him to descend into hell in order to deliver us also from going down into hell. Hence it is written (Hosea 13:14): "O death, I will be thy death; O hell, I will be thy bite." Secondly, because it was fitting when the devil was overthrown by the Passion that Christ should deliver the captives detained in hell, according to Zechariah 9:11: "Thou also by the blood of Thy Testament hast sent forth Thy prisoners out of the pit." And it is written (Colossians 2:15): "Despoiling the principalities and powers, He hath exposed them confidently." Thirdly, that as He showed forth His power on earth by living and dying, so also He might manifest it in hell, by visiting it and enlightening it. Accordingly it is written (Psalm 23:7): "Lift up your gates, O ye princes," which the gloss thus interprets: "that is--Ye princes of hell, take away your power, whereby hitherto you held men fast in hell"; and so "at the name of Jesus every knee should bow," not only "of them that are in heaven," but likewise "of them that are in hell," as is said in Philippians 2:10.
[III.q.52.a.1.co] Respondeo dicendum, quod in matrimonii contractu obligatur unus conjugum alteri ad debitum reddendum. Et ideo si ille qui se obligat, est impotens ad solvendum, ignorantia hujusmodi impotentiæ in eo cui fit obligatio tollit contractum. Sicut autem per impotentiam coeundi efficitur aliquis impotens ad solvendum debitum, ut omnino non possit solvere; ita per servitutem, ut libere debitum reddere non possit. Et ideo sicut impotentia coeundi ignorata impedit matrimonium, non autem si sciatur, sicut infra patebit, ita conditio servitutis ignorata impedit matrimonium, non autem servitus scita.
[III.q.52.a.1.ad.1] The name of hell stands for an evil of penalty, and not for an evil of guilt. Hence it was becoming that Christ should descend into hell, not as liable to punishment Himself, but to deliver them who were.
[III.q.52.a.1.ad.1] Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod servitus contrariatur matrimonio quantum ad actum, ad quem quis per matrimonium alteri obligatur, quem non potest libere exequi; et quantum ad bonum prolis, quæ pejoris conditionis efficitur ex servitute parentis. Sed quia quilibet potest in eo quod sibi debetur, sponte detrimentum aliquod subire, ideo si alter conjugum scit alterius servitutem, nihilominus tenet matrimonium. Similiter etiam quia in matrimonio est æqualis obligatio ex utraque parte ad debitum reddendum, non potest aliquis requirere majorem obligationem ex parte alterius quam ipse possit facere. Et propter hoc etiam si servus contrahit cum ancilla, quam credit liberam, non propter hoc impeditur matrimonium. Et sic patet quod servitus non impedit matrimonium, nisi quando est ignorata ab alio conjuge, et si ille sit liberæ conditionis. Et ideo nihil prohibet inter servos esse conjugia vel etiam inter liberum et ancillam.
[III.q.52.a.1.ad.2] Christ's Passion was a kind of universal cause of men's salvation, both of the living and of the dead. But a general cause is applied to particular effects by means of something special. Hence, as the power of the Passion is applied to the living through the sacraments which make us like unto Christ's Passion, so likewise it is applied to the dead through His descent into hell. On which account it is written (Zechariah 9:11) that "He sent forth prisoners out of the pit, in the blood of His testament," that is, by the power of His Passion.
[III.q.52.a.1.ad.2] Ad secundum dicendum, quod nihil prohibet aliquid esse contra naturam quantum ad primam intentionem ipsius, quod non est contra naturam quantum ad secundam intentionem ejus: sicut omnis corruptio, et defectus, et senium, est contra naturam, ut dicitur in II De cælo, text. 37, quia natura intendit esse et perfectionem; non tamen est contra secundam intentionem naturæ, quia ex quo natura non potest conservare esse in uno, conservat in altero, quod generatur ex corruptione alterius, et quando natura non potest perducere ad majorem perfectionem inducit ad minorem: sicut quando non potest facere masculum, facit feminam, quæ est mas occasionatus, ut dicitur in XV1 De animalib., cap. III, ad fin. Similiter etiam dico quod servitus est contra primam intentionem naturæ; sed non est contra secundam, quia naturalis ratio ad hoc inclinat, et hoc appetit natura ut quilibet sit bonus. Sed ex quo aliquis peccat, natura etiam inclinat ut ex peccato pœnam reportet: et sic servitus in pœnam peccati introducta est. Nec est inconveniens aliquid naturale per hoc quod est contra naturam hoc modo impediri: sic enim matrimonium impeditur per impotentiam coeundi, quæ est contra naturam modo prædicto.
[III.q.52.a.1.ad.3] Christ's soul descended into hell not by the same kind of motion as that whereby bodies are moved, but by that kind whereby the angels are moved, as was said in I, 53, 1.
[III.q.52.a.1.ad.3] Ad tertium dicendum, quod jus naturale dictat quod pœna sit pro culpa infligenda, et quod nullus sine culpa puniri debeat; sed determinare pœnam secundum conditionem personæ, et culpæ, est juris positivi. Et ideo servitus, quæ est quædam pœna determinata, est de jure positivo, et a naturali proficiscitur, sicut determinatum ab indeterminato, et eodem jure positivo determinante est factum quod servitus ignorata matrimonium impediat, ne aliquis sine culpa puniatur; est enim quædam pœna uxoris quod habeat virum servum, et e converso.
Article 2
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.1] It would seem that Christ went down into the hell of the lost, because it is said by the mouth of Divine Wisdom (Sirach 24:45): "I will penetrate to all the lower parts of the earth." But the hell of the lost is computed among the lower parts of the earth according to Psalm 62:10: "They shall go into the lower parts of the earth." Therefore Christ who is the Wisdom of God, went down even into the hell of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.1] Ad secundum sic proceditur. 4. Videtur quod servus matrimonium contrahere non possit sine consensu domini. Nullus enim potest alicui dare quod est alterius, sine consensu ipsius. Sed servus est res domini. Ergo non potest contrahendo matrimonium dare potestatem corporis sui uxori sine consensu domini.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.2] Further, Peter says (Acts 2:24) that "God hath raised up Christ, having loosed the sorrows of hell, as it was impossible that He should be holden by it." But there are no sorrows in the hell of the Fathers, nor in the hell of the children, since they are not punished with sensible pain on account of any actual sin, but only with the pain of loss on account of original sin. Therefore Christ went down into the hell of the lost, or else into Purgatory, where men are tormented with sensible pain on account of actual sins.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.2] 2. Præterea, servus tenetur domino suo obedire. Sed dominus potest ei præcipere quod in matrimonium non consentiat. Ergo sine consensu ejus non potest matrimonium contrahere.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.3] Further, it is written (1 Peter 3:19) that "Christ coming in spirit preached to those spirits that were in prison, which had some time been incredulous": and this is understood of Christ's descent into hell, as Athanasius says (Ep. ad Epict.). For he says that "Christ's body was laid in the sepulchre when He went to preach to those spirits who were in bondage, as Peter said." But it is clear the unbelievers were in the hell of the lost. Therefore Christ went down into the hell of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.3] 3. Præterea post contractum matrimonium servus tenetur reddere debitum uxori, etiam ex præcepto juris divini. Sed eo tempore quo uxor debitum petit, potest dominus aliquod servitium servo imponere, quod facere non poterit, si carnali copulæ vacare velit. Ergo si sine consensu domini posset servus contrahere matrimonium, privaretur dominus servitio sibi debito sine culpa, quod esse non debet.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.4] Further, Augustine says (Ep. ad Evod. clxiv): "If the sacred Scriptures had said that Christ came into Abraham's bosom, without naming hell or its woes, I wonder whether any person would dare to assert that He descended into hell. But since evident testimonies mention hell and its sorrows, there is no reason for believing that Christ went there except to deliver men from the same woes." But the place of woes is the hell of the lost. Therefore Christ descended into the hell of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.4] 4. Præterea, dominus potest vendere servum suum in extraneas regiones, quo uxor sua non poterit eum sequi, vel propter infirmitatem corporis, vel propter fidei periculum imminens: puta si vendatur infidelibus, vel etiam domino uxoris non permittente, si sit ancilla; et sic matrimonium dissolvetur, quod est inconveniens. Ergo non potest servus sine consensu domini matrimonium contrahere.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.5] Further, as Augustine says in a sermon upon the Resurrection: Christ descending into hell "set free all the just who were held in the bonds of original sin." But among them was Job, who says of himself (Job 17:16): "All that I have shall go down into the deepest pit." Therefore Christ descended into the deepest pit.
[III.q.52.a.2.arg.5] 5. Præterea, favorabiliar est obligatio qua homo divinis obsequiis se mancipat, quam illa qua homo se uxori subjicit. Sed servus sine consensu domini non potest religionem intrare, vel ad ordines promoveri. Ergo multo minus potest sine ejus consensu matrimonio jungi.
[III.q.52.a.2.sc] Regarding the hell of the lost it is written (Job 10:21): "Before I go, and return no more, to a land that is dark and covered with the mist of death." Now there is no "fellowship of light with darkness," according to 2 Corinthians 6:14. Therefore Christ, who is "the light," did not descend into the hell of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.2.sc] Sed contra, Galat., 111, 28: In Christo Jesu non est servus, neque liber. Ergo ad matrimonium contrahendum in fide Christi Jesu eadem est libertas liberis et servis. Præterea, servitus est de jure positivo. Sed matrimonium est de jure naturali et divino. Cum ergo jus positivum non præjudicet juri naturali aut divino, videtur quod servus absque domini consensu matrimonium contrahere possit.
[III.q.52.a.2.co] A thing is said to be in a place in two ways. First of all, through its effect, and in this way Christ descended into each of the hells, but in different manner. For going down into the hell of the lost He wrought this effect, that by descending thither He put them to shame for their unbelief and wickedness: but to them who were detained in Purgatory He gave hope of attaining to glory: while upon the holy Fathers detained in hell solely on account of original sin, He shed the light of glory everlasting.
In another way a thing is said to be in a place through its essence: and in this way Christ's soul descended only into that part of hell wherein the just were detained. so that He visited them "in place," according to His soul, whom He visited "interiorly by grace," according to His Godhead. Accordingly, while remaining in one part of hell, He wrought this effect in a measure in every part of hell, just as while suffering in one part of the earth He delivered the whole world by His Passion.
[III.q.52.a.2.co] Respondeo dicendum, quod jus positivum, ut dictum est, progreditur a jure naturali. Et ideo servitus quæ est de jure positivo, non potest præjudicare his quæ sunt de jure naturali. Sicut autem appetitus naturæ est ad conservationem individui, ita est ad conservationem speciei per generationem. Unde sicut servus non subditur domino, quin libere possit comedere, et dormire, et alia hujusmodi facere, quæ ad necessitatem corporis pertinent, sine quibus natura conservari non potest; ita non subditur ei quantum ad hoc quod non possit libere matrimonium contrahere, etiam domino nesciente, aut contradicente.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.1] Christ, who is the Wisdom of God, penetrated to all the lower parts of the earth, not passing through them locally with His soul, but by spreading the effects of His power in a measure to them all: yet so that He enlightened only the just: because the text quoted continues: "And I will enlighten all that hope in the Lord."
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.1] Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod servus est res domini quantum ad ea quæ naturalibus superadduntur, sed quantum ad naturalia omnes sunt pares. Unde in his quæ ad actus naturales pertinent, servus potest alteri, invito domino, sui corporis potestatem per matrimonium præbere.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.2] Sorrow is twofold: one is the suffering of pain which men endure for actual sin, according to Psalm 17:6: "The sorrows of hell encompassed me." Another sorrow comes of hoped-for glory being deferred, according to Proverbs 13:12: "Hope that is deferred afflicteth the soul": and such was the sorrow which the holy Fathers suffered in hell, and Augustine refers to it in a sermon on the Passion, saying that "they besought Christ with tearful entreaty." Now by descending into hell Christ took away both sorrows, yet in different ways: for He did away with the sorrows of pains by preserving souls from them, just as a physician is said to free a man from sickness by warding it off by means of physic. Likewise He removed the sorrows caused by glory deferred, by bestowing glory.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.2] Ad secundum dicendum, quod servus domino suo tenetur obedire in his quæ dominus licite potest præcipere. Sicut autem licite non potest dominus præcipere servo quod non comedat, vel dormiat, ita etiam nec quod a matrimonio contrahendo abstineat. Interest enim ad legislatorem, qualiter qualibet re sua utatur. Et ideo si dominus præcipiat servo quod non contrahat matrimonium; servus non tenetur domino obedire.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.3] These words of Peter are referred by some to Christ's descent into hell: and they explain it in this sense: "Christ preached to them who formerly were unbelievers, and who were shut up in prison"--that is, in hell--"in spirit"--that is, by His soul. Hence Damascene says (De Fide Orth. iii): "As He evangelized them who are upon the earth, so did He those who were in hell"; not in order to convert unbelievers unto belief, but to put them to shame for their unbelief, since preaching cannot be understood otherwise than as the open manifesting of His Godhead. which was laid bare before them in the lower regions by His descending in power into hell.
Augustine, however, furnishes a better exposition of the text in his Epistle to Evodius quoted above, namely, that the preaching is not to be referred to Christ's descent into hell, but to the operation of His Godhead, to which He gave effect from the beginning of the world. Consequently, the sense is, that "to those (spirits) that were in prison"--that is, living in the mortal body, which is, as it were, the soul's prison-house--"by the spirit" of His Godhead "He came and preached" by internal inspirations, and from without by the admonitions spoken by the righteous: to those, I say, He preached "which had been some time incredulous," i.e. not believing in the preaching of Noah, "when they waited for the patience of God," whereby the chastisement of the Deluge was put off: accordingly (Peter) adds: "In the days of Noah, when the Ark was being built."
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.3] Ad tertium dicendum, quod si servus, volente domino, matrimonium contraxerit, tunc debet prætermittere servitium domini imperantis, et reddere debitum uxori, quia per hoc quod dominus concessit ut matrimonium servus contraheret, intelligitur ei concessisse omnia quæ matrimo-nium requirit. Si autem matrimonium ignorante vel contradicente domino est contractum non tenetur reddere debitum, sed potius domino obedire si utrumque simul esse non possit. Sed tamen in his multa particularia considerari debent; sicut etiam in omnibus humanis actibus, scilicet periculum castitatis imminens uxori, et impedimentum quod ex redditione debiti servitio imperato generatur, et alia hujusmodi: quibus omnibus rite pensatis judicari poterit, cui magis servus obedire teneatur, domino vel uxori.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.4] The expression "Abraham's bosom" may be taken in two senses. First of all, as implying that restfulness, existing there, from sensible pain; so that in this sense it cannot be called hell, nor are there any sorrows there. In another way it can be taken as implying the privation of longed-for glory: in this sense it has the character of hell and sorrow. Consequently, that rest of the blessed is now called Abraham's bosom, yet it is not styled hell, nor are sorrows said to be now in Abraham's bosom.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.4] Ad quartum dicendum, quod in tali casu dicitur, quod dominus cogendus est ne servum vendat taliter quod faciat onera matrimonii graviora; præcipue cum non desit facultas ubicumque servum suum vendendi justo pretio.
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.5] As Gregory says (Moral. xiii): "Even the higher regions of hell he calls the deepest hell . . . For if relatively to the height of heaven this darksome air is infernal, then relatively to the height of this same air the earth lying beneath can be considered as infernal and deep. And again in comparison with the height of the same earth, those parts of hell which are higher than the other infernal mansions, may in this way be designated as the deepest hell."
[III.q.52.a.2.ad.5] Ad quintum dicendum, quod per religionem vel ordinis susceptionem, aliquis obligatur divinis obsequiis quantum ad totum tempus: sed vir tenetur debitum reddere uxori non semper, sed congruis temporibus. Et ideo non est simile. Et præterea, ille qui intrat religionem, vel suscipit ordinem, obligat se ad aliqua opera quæ sunt naturalibus superaddita, in quibus dominus potestatem ejus habet et non in naturalibus, ad quæ obligat se per matrimonium. Unde non posset continentiam vovere sine consensu domini.
Article 3
[III.q.52.a.3.arg.1] It would seem that the whole Christ was not in hell. For Christ's body is one of His parts. But His body was not in hell. Therefore, the whole Christ was not in hell.
[III.q.52.a.3.arg.1] Ad tertium sic proceditur. 4. Videtur quod servitus matrimonio non possit supervenire, ut vir se alteri in servum vendat, quia quod in fraudem et præjudicium alterius factum est, ratum non debet esse. Sed vir qui se in servum vendit, facit hoc quandoque in fraudem matrimonii, et ad minus in detrimentum uxoris. Ergo non debet valere talis venditio ad servitutem inducendam.
[III.q.52.a.3.arg.2] Further, nothing can be termed whole when its parts are severed. But the soul and body, which are the parts of human nature, were separated at His death, as stated above (50, 3,4), and it was after death that He descended into hell. Therefore the whole (Christ) could not be in hell.
[III.q.52.a.3.arg.2] 2. Præterea, duo favorabilia præjudicant uni non favorabili. Sed matrimonium et libertas sunt favorabilia et repugnant servituti, quae non est favorabilis in jure. Ergo talis servitus in matrimonio debet penitus annullari.
[III.q.52.a.3.arg.3] Further, the whole of a thing is said to be in a place when no part of it is outside such place. But there were parts of Christ outside hell; for instance, His body was in the grave, and His Godhead everywhere. Therefore the whole Christ was not in hell.
[III.q.52.a.3.arg.3] 3. Præterea, in matrimonio vir et uxor ad paria judicantur. Sed uxor non potest se in ancillam dare, nolente marito. Ergo nec vir, nolente uxore.
[III.q.52.a.3.sc] Augustine says (De Symbolo iii): "The whole Son is with the Father, the whole Son in heaven, on earth, in the Virgin's womb, on the Cross, in hell, in paradise, into which He brought the robber."
[III.q.52.a.3.sc] Sed contra, quilibet potest dare alteri quod suum est. Sed vir est sui juris, cum sit liber. Ergo potest dare jus suum alteri. Præterea, servus potest, nolente domino, uxorem ducere, ut dictum est. Ergo eadem ratione vir potest domino se subjicere, nolente uxore.
[III.q.52.a.3.co] It is evident from what was said in I, 31, 2, ad 4, the masculine gender is referred to the hypostasis or person, while the neuter belongs to the nature. Now in the death of Christ, although the soul was separated from the body, yet neither was separated from the Person of the Son of God, as stated above (Question 50, Article 2). Consequently, it must be affirmed that during the three days of Christ's death the whole Christ was in the tomb, because the whole Person was there through the body united with Him, and likewise He was entirely in hell, because the whole Person of Christ was there by reason of the soul united with Him, and the whole Christ was then everywhere by reason of the Divine Nature.
[III.q.52.a.3.co] Respondeo dicendum, quod vir subditur uxori solum in his quæ ad actum naturæ pertinent, in quibus sunt aquales, ad quæ servitutis subjectio se non extendit. Et ideo vir, nolente uxore, potest se alteri in servum dare; non tamen ex hoc matrimonium dissolvitur quia nullum impedimentum matrimonio superveniens potest dissolvere ipsum, ut dictum est.
[III.q.52.a.3.ad.1] The body which was then in the grave is not a part of the uncreated Person, but of the assumed nature. Consequently, the fact of Christ's body not being in hell does not prevent the whole Christ from being there: but proves that not everything appertaining to human nature was there.
[III.q.52.a.3.ad.1] Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod fraus bene potest nocere ei qui fraudem facit, sed non potest alteri præjudicium generare. Et ideo si vir in fraudem uxoris alteri det se in servum, ipse damnum reportat, inæstimabile bonum libertatis amittens; sed uxori nullum potest ex hoc præjudicium generari, quin teneatur redere debitum petenti, et ad omnia quæ matrimonium requirit; non enim potest ab his retrahi domini sui præcepto.
[III.q.52.a.3.ad.2] The whole human nature is made up of the united soul and body; not so the Divine Person. Consequently when death severed the union of the soul with the body, the whole Christ remained, but His whole human nature did not remain.
[III.q.52.a.3.ad.2] Ad secundum dicendum, quod quantum ad hoc quod servitus matrimonio repugnat, matrimonium servituti præjudicat, quia tunc servus tenetur uxori debitum reddere, etiam nolente domino.
[III.q.52.a.3.ad.3] Christ's Person is whole in each single place, but not wholly, because it is not circumscribed by any place: indeed, all places put together could not comprise His immensity; rather is it His immensity that embraces all things. But it happens in those things which are in a place corporeally and circumscriptively, that if a whole be in some place, then no part of it is outside that place. But this is not the case with God. Hence Augustine says (De Symbolo iii): "It is not according to times or places that we say that the whole Christ is everywhere, as if He were at one time whole in one place, at another time whole in another: but as being whole always and everywhere."
[III.q.52.a.3.ad.3] Ad tertium dicendum, quod quamvis in actu matrimoniali et in his quæ ad naturam spectant, ad paria vir et uxor judicentur, ad quæ conditione servitutis se non extendit; tamen, quantum ad dispensatio nem domus, et ad alia hujusmodi superaddita, vir est caput uxoris, et debet corrigere eam; non autem e converso: et ideo uxor non potest se dare in ancillam, nolente viro.
Article 4
[III.q.52.a.4.arg.1] It would seem that Christ did not make any stay in hell. For Christ went down into hell to deliver men from thence. But He accomplished this deliverance at once by His descent, for, according to Sirach 11:23: "It is easy in the eyes of God on a sudden to make the poor man rich." Consequently He does not seem to have tarried in hell.
[III.q.52.a.4.arg.1] Ad quartum sic proceditur. 1. Videtur quod filii debeant sequi conditionem patris, quia denominatio fit a digniori. Sed pater in generatione est dignior quam mater. Ergo, etc.
[III.q.52.a.4.arg.2] Further, Augustine says in a sermon on the Passion (clx) that "of a sudden at our Lord and Saviour's bidding all 'the bars of iron were burst'" (Cf. Isaiah 45:2). Hence on behalf of the angels accompanying Christ it is written (Psalm 23:7-9): "Lift up your gates, O ye princes." Now Christ descended thither in order to break the bolts of hell. Therefore He did not make any stay in hell.
[III.q.52.a.4.arg.2] 2. Præterea, esse rei magis dependet a forma quam a materia. Sed in generatione pater dat formam et mater materiam, ut dicitur in XVI De animalib., cap. iv, aliquant. a princ. Ergo magis debet sequi proles patrem quam matrem.
[III.q.52.a.4.arg.3] Further, it is related (Luke 23:43) that our Lord while hanging on the cross said to the thief: "This day thou shalt be with Me in paradise": from which it is evident that Christ was in paradise on that very day. But He was not there with His body. for that was in the grave. Therefore He was there with the soul which had gone down into hell: and consequently it appears that He made no stay in hell.
[III.q.52.a.4.arg.3] 3. Præterea, illud præcipue debet aliquid sequi cui magis assimilatur. Sed filius plus assimilatur patri quam matri, sicut et filia plus matri. Ergo ad minus filius plus debet sequi patrem, et filia matrem.
[III.q.52.a.4.sc] Peter says (Acts 2:24): "Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the sorrows of hell, as it was impossible that He should be held by it." Therefore it seems that He remained in hell until the hour of the Resurrection.
[III.q.52.a.4.sc] Sed contra, si quis seminat in terra aliena, fructus sunt ejus cujus est terra. Sed venter mulieris respectu seminis viri est sicut terra respectu sementis. Ergo etc. Præterea, in aliis animalibus quæ ex diversis speciebus nascuntur, hoc videmus quod partus magis sequitur matrem quam patrem: unde muli, qui nascuntur ex equa et asino, magis assimilantur equabus quam illi qui nascuntur ex asina et equo. Ergo similiter debet esse in hominibus.
[III.q.52.a.4.co] As Christ, in order to take our penalties upon Himself, willed His body to be laid in the tomb, so likewise He willed His soul to descend into hell. But the body lay in the tomb for a day and two nights, so as to demonstrate the truth of His death. Consequently, it is to be believed that His soul was in hell, in order that it might be brought back out of hell simultaneously with His body from the tomb.
[III.q.52.a.4.co] Respondeo dicendum, quod secundum leges civiles, l. XIX, ff. De statu hom., et l. VII, c. De rei vendit., partus sequitur ventrem. Et hoc rationabiliter, quia proles habet a patre complementum formale sed a matre substantiam corporis. Servitus autem corporalis conditio est, cum servus sit quasi instrumentum domini in operando. Et ideo proles in libertate et servitute sequitur matrem. Sed in his quæ pertinent ad dignitatem, secundum quod est ex forma rei, sequitur patrem; sicut in honoribus et municipiis et hereditate et aliis hujusmodi. Et huic etiam concordant canones cap. « Liberi, » xxxii, quæst. iv, col. 4483, et cap. « Indecens, » De natis ex libero ventre, et lex Moysi, ut patet Exodi, xxi. In quibusdam tamen terris, quæ jure civili non reguntur partus sequitur deteriorem conditionem; ut si sit pater servus, quamvis mater sit libera, erunt filii servi; non tamen si post peractum matrimonium pater se in servum dedit, nolente uxore; et similiter si sit e converso. Si autem uterque sit servilis conditionis, et pertineant ad diversos dominos, tunc dividunt filios, si plures sint; vel si unus tantum, unus alteri recompensabit de pretio, et accipiet prolem natam in sui servitium. Tamen non est credibile quod talis consuetudo possit esse ita rationabilis, sicut illud quod multorum sapientum diuturno consilio determinatum est. Hoc etiam in naturalibus inventur quod receptum est in recipiente per modum recipientis, et non per modum dantis. Et ideo rationabile est quod semen receptum in muliere ad conditionem ipsius trahatur.
[III.q.52.a.4.ad.1] When Christ descended into hell He delivered the saints who were there, not by leading them out at once from the confines of hell, but by enlightening them with the light of glory in hell itself. Nevertheless it was fitting that His soul should abide in hell as long as His body remained in the tomb.
[III.q.52.a.4.ad.1] Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod quamvis pater sit dignius principium matre; tamen mater dat substantiam corporalem; ex parte cujus attenditur conditio servitutis.
[III.q.52.a.4.ad.2] By the expression "bars of hell" are understood the obstacles which kept the holy Fathers from quitting hell, through the guilt of our first parent's sin; and these bars Christ burst asunder by the power of His Passion on descending into hell: nevertheless He chose to remain in hell for some time, for the reason stated above.
[III.q.52.a.4.ad.2] Ad secundum dicendum, quod in his quæ ad rationem speciei pertinent magis assimilatur filius patri quam matri. Sed in materialibus conditionibus magis debet assimilari matri quam patri, quia res habet a forma esse specificum, sed conditiones materiales a materia.
[III.q.52.a.4.ad.3] Our Lord's expression is not to be understood of the earthly corporeal paradise, but of a spiritual one, in which all are said to be who enjoy the Divine glory. Accordingly, the thief descended locally into hell with Christ, because it was said to him: "This day thou shalt be with Me in paradise"; still as to reward he was in paradise, because he enjoyed Christ's Godhead just as the other saints did.
[III.q.52.a.4.ad.3] Ad tertium dicendum, quod filius assimilatur patri ratione formæ, quam habet in sui complemento, sicut et pater. Et ideo ratio non est ad propositum.
Article 5
[III.q.52.a.5.arg.1] It would seem that Christ descending into hell did not deliver the holy Fathers from thence. For Augustine (Epist. ad Evod. clxiv) says: "I have not yet discovered what Christ descending into hell bestowed upon those righteous ones who were in Abraham's bosom, from whom I fail to see that He ever departed according to the beatific presence of His Godhead." But had He delivered them, He would have bestowed much upon them. Therefore it does not appear that Christ delivered the holy Fathers from hell.
[III.q.52.a.5.arg.2] Further, no one is detained in hell except on account of sin. But during life the holy Fathers were justified from sin through faith in Christ. Consequently they did not need to be delivered from hell on Christ's descent thither.
[III.q.52.a.5.arg.3] Further, if you remove the cause, you remove the effect. But that Christ went down into hell was due to sin which was taken away by the Passion, as stated above (Question 49, Article 1). Consequently, the holy Fathers were not delivered on Christ's descent into hell.
[III.q.52.a.5.sc] Augustine says in the sermon on the Passion already quoted that when Christ descended into hell "He broke down the gate and 'iron bars' of hell, setting at liberty all the righteous who were held fast through original sin."
[III.q.52.a.5.co] As stated above (4, ad 2), when Christ descended into hell He worked through the power of His Passion. But through Christ's Passion the human race was delivered not only from sin, but also from the debt of its penalty, as stated above (49, 1,3). Now men were held fast by the debt of punishment in two ways: first of all for actual sin which each had committed personally: secondly, for the sin of the whole human race, which each one in his origin contracts from our first parent, as stated in Romans 5 of which sin the penalty is the death of the body as well as exclusion from glory, as is evident from Genesis 2 and 3: because God cast out man from paradise after sin, having beforehand threatened him with death should he sin. Consequently, when Christ descended into hell, by the power of His Passion He delivered the saints from the penalty whereby they were excluded from the life of glory, so as to be unable to see God in His Essence, wherein man's beatitude lies, as stated in the I-II, 3, 8. But the holy Fathers were detained in hell for the reason, that, owing to our first parent's sin, the approach to the life of glory was not opened. And so when Christ descended into hell He delivered the holy Fathers from thence. And this is what is written Zechariah 9:11: "Thou also by the blood of Thy testament hast sent forth Thy prisoners out of the pit, wherein is no water." And (Colossians 2:15) it is written that "despoiling the principalities and powers," i.e. "of hell, by taking out Isaac and Jacob, and the other just souls," "He led them," i.e. "He brought them far from this kingdom of darkness into heaven," as the gloss explains.
[III.q.52.a.5.ad.1] Augustine is speaking there against such as maintained that the righteous of old were subject to penal sufferings before Christ's descent into hell. Hence shortly before the passage quoted he says: "Some add that this benefit was also bestowed upon the saints of old, that on the Lord's coming into hell they were freed from their sufferings. But I fail to see how Abraham, into whose bosom the poor man was received, was ever in such sufferings." Consequently, when he afterwards adds that "he had not yet discovered what Christ's descent into hell had brought to the righteous of old," this must be understood as to their being freed from penal sufferings. Yet Christ bestowed something upon them as to their attaining glory: and in consequence He dispelled the suffering which they endured through their glory being delayed: still they had great joy from the very hope thereof, according to John 8:56: "Abraham your father rejoiced that he might see my day." And therefore he adds: "I fail to see that He ever departed, according to the beatific presence of His Godhead," that is, inasmuch as even before Christ's coming they were happy in hope, although not yet fully happy in fact.
[III.q.52.a.5.ad.2] The holy Fathers while yet living were delivered from original as well as actual sin through faith in Christ; also from the penalty of actual sins, but not from the penalty of original sin, whereby they were excluded from glory, since the price of man's redemption was not yet paid: just as the faithful are now delivered by baptism from the penalty of actual sins, and from the penalty of original sin as to exclusion from glory, yet still remain bound by the penalty of original sin as to the necessity of dying in the body because they are renewed in the spirit, but not yet in the flesh, according to Romans 8:10: "The body indeed is dead, because of sin; but the spirit liveth, because of justification."
[III.q.52.a.5.ad.3] Directly Christ died His soul went down into hell, and bestowed the fruits of His Passion on the saints detained there; although they did not go out as long as Christ remained in hell, because His presence was part of the fulness of their glory.
Article 6
[III.q.52.a.6.arg.1] It would seem that Christ did deliver some of the lost from hell, because it is written (Isaiah 24:22): "And they shall be gathered together as in the gathering of one bundle into the pit, end they shall be shut up there in prison: and after many days they shall be visited." But there he is speaking of the lost, who "had adored the host of heaven," according to Jerome's commentary. Consequently it seems that even the lost were visited at Christ's descent into hell; and this seems to imply their deliverance.
[III.q.52.a.6.arg.2] Further, on Zechariah 9:11: "Thou also by the blood of Thy testament hast sent forth Thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water," the gloss observes: "Thou hast delivered them who were held bound in prisons, where no mercy refreshed them, which that rich man prayed for." But only the lost are shut up in merciless prisons. Therefore Christ did deliver some from the hell of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.6.arg.3] Further, Christ's power was not less in hell than in this world, because He worked in every place by the power of His Godhead. But in this world He delivered some persons of every state. Therefore, in hell also, He delivered some from the state of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.6.sc] It is written (Hosea 13:14): "O death, I will be thy death; O hell, I will be thy bite": upon which the gloss says: "By leading forth the elect, and leaving there the reprobate." But only the reprobate are in the hell of the lost. Therefore, by Christ's descent into hell none were delivered from the hell of the lost.
[III.q.52.a.6.co] As stated above (Article 5), when Christ descended into hell He worked by the power of His Passion. Consequently, His descent into hell brought the fruits of deliverance to them only who were united to His Passion through faith quickened by charity, whereby sins are taken away. Now those detained in the hell of the lost either had no faith in Christ's Passion, as infidels; or if they had faith, they had no conformity with the charity of the suffering Christ: hence they could not be cleansed from their sins. And on this account Christ's descent into hell brought them no deliverance from the debt of punishment in hell.
[III.q.52.a.6.ad.1] When Christ descended into hell, all who were in any part of hell were visited in some respect: some to their consolation and deliverance, others, namely, the lost, to their shame and confusion. Accordingly the passage continues: "And the moon shall blush, and the sun be put to shame," etc.
This can also be referred to the visitation which will come upon them in the Day of Judgment, not for their deliverance, but for their yet greater confusion, according to Zephaniah 1:12: "I will visit upon the men that are settled on their lees."
[III.q.52.a.6.ad.2] When the gloss says "where no mercy refreshed them," this is to be understood of the refreshing of full deliverance, because the holy Fathers could not be delivered from this prison of hell before Christ's coming.
[III.q.52.a.6.ad.3] It was not due to any lack of power on Christ's part that some were not delivered from every state in hell, as out of every state among men in this world; but it was owing to the very different condition of each state. For, so long as men live here below, they can be converted to faith and charity, because in this life men are not confirmed either in good or in evil, as they are after quitting this life.
Article 7
[III.q.52.a.7.arg.1] It would seem that the children who died in original sin were delivered from hell by Christ's descending thither. For, like the holy Fathers, the children were kept in hell simply because of original sin. But the holy Fathers were delivered from hell, as stated above (Article 5). Therefore the children were similarly delivered from hell by Christ.
[III.q.52.a.7.arg.2] Further, the Apostle says (Romans 5:15): "If by the offense of one, many died; much more the grace of God and the gift, by the grace of one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many." But the children who die with none but original sin are detained in hell owing to their first parent's sin. Therefore, much more were they delivered from hell through the grace of Christ.
[III.q.52.a.7.arg.3] Further, as Baptism works in virtue of Christ's Passion, so also does Christ's descent into hell, as is clear from what has been said (4, ad 2, 5,6). But through Baptism children are delivered from original sin and hell. Therefore, they were similarly delivered by Christ's descent into hell.
[III.q.52.a.7.sc] The Apostle says (Romans 3:25): "God hath proposed Christ to be a propitiation, through faith in His blood." But the children who had died with only original sin were in no wise sharers of faith in Christ. Therefore, they did not receive the fruits of Christ's propitiation, so as to be delivered by Him from hell.
[III.q.52.a.7.co] As stated above (Article 6), Christ's descent into hell had its effect of deliverance on them only who through faith and charity were united to Christ's Passion, in virtue whereof Christ's descent into hell was one of deliverance. But the children who had died in original sin were in no way united to Christ's Passion by faith and love: for, not having the use of free will, they could have no faith of their own; nor were they cleansed from original sin either by their parents' faith or by any sacrament of faith. Consequently, Christ's descent into hell did not deliver the children from thence. And furthermore, the holy Fathers were delivered from hell by being admitted to the glory of the vision of God, to which no one can come except through grace; according to Romans 6:23: "The grace of God is life everlasting." Therefore, since children dying in original sin had no grace, they were not delivered from hell.
[III.q.52.a.7.ad.1] The holy Fathers, although still held bound by the debt of original sin, in so far as it touches human nature, were nevertheless delivered from all stain of sin by faith in Christ: consequently, they were capable of that deliverance which Christ brought by descending into hell. But the same cannot be said of the children, as is evident from what was said above.
[III.q.52.a.7.ad.2] When the Apostle says that the grace of God "hath abounded unto many," the word "many" [The Vulgate reads 'plures,' i.e. 'many more'] is to be taken, not comparatively, as if more were saved by Christ's grace than lost by Adam's sin: but absolutely, as if he said that the grace of the one Christ abounded unto many, just as Adam's sin was contracted by many. But as Adam's sin was contracted by those only who descended seminally from him according to the flesh, so Christ's grace reached those only who became His members by spiritual regeneration: which does not apply to children dying in original sin.
[III.q.52.a.7.ad.3] Baptism is applied to men in this life, in which man's state can be changed from sin into grace: but Christ's descent into hell was vouchsafed to the souls after this life when they are no longer capable of the said change. And consequently by baptism children are delivered from original sin and from hell, but not by Christ's descent into hell.
Article 8
[III.q.52.a.8.arg.1] It would seem that Christ by His descent into hell delivered souls from Purgatory--for Augustine says (Ep. ad Evod. clxiv): "Because evident testimonies speak of hell and its pains, there is no reason for believing that the Saviour came thither except to rescue men from those same pains: but I still wish to know whether it was all whom He found there, or some whom He deemed worthy of such a benefit. Yet I do not doubt that Christ went into hell, and granted this favor to them who were suffering from its pains." But, as stated above (Article 6), He did not confer the benefit of deliverance upon the lost: and there are no others in a state of penal suffering except those in Purgatory. Consequently Christ delivered souls from Purgatory.
[III.q.52.a.8.arg.2] Further, the very presence of Christ's soul had no less effect than His sacraments have. But souls are delivered from Purgatory by the sacraments, especially by the sacrament of the Eucharist, as shall be shown later (XP, 71, 9). Therefore much more were souls delivered from Purgatory by the presence of Christ descending into hell.
[III.q.52.a.8.arg.3] Further, as Augustine says (De Poenit. ix), those whom Christ healed in this life He healed completely. Also, our Lord says (John 7:23): "I have healed the whole man on the sabbath-day." But Christ delivered them who were in Purgatory from the punishment of the pain of loss, whereby they were excluded from glory. Therefore, He also delivered them from the punishment of Purgatory.
[III.q.52.a.8.sc] Gregory says (Moral. xiii): "Since our Creator and Redeemer, penetrating the bars of hell, brought out from thence the souls of the elect, He does not permit us to go thither, from whence He has already by descending set others free." But He permits us to go to Purgatory. Therefore, by descending into hell, He did not deliver souls from Purgatory.
[III.q.52.a.8.co] As we have stated more than once (4, ad 2, 5,6,7), Christ's descent into hell was one of deliverance in virtue of His Passion. Now Christ's Passion had a virtue which was neither temporal nor transitory, but everlasting, according to Hebrews 10:14: "For by one oblation He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified." And so it is evident that Christ's Passion had no greater efficacy then than it has now. Consequently, they who were such as those who are now in Purgatory, were not set free from Purgatory by Christ's descent into hell. But if any were found such as are now set free from Purgatory by virtue of Christ's Passion, then there was nothing to hinder them from being delivered from Purgatory by Christ's descent into hell.
[III.q.52.a.8.ad.1] From this passage of Augustine it cannot be concluded that all who were in Purgatory were delivered from it, but that such a benefit was bestowed upon some persons, that is to say, upon such as were already cleansed sufficiently, or who in life, by their faith and devotion towards Christ's death, so merited, that when He descended, they were delivered from the temporal punishment of Purgatory.
[III.q.52.a.8.ad.2] Christ's power operates in the sacraments by way of healing and expiation. Consequently, the sacrament of the Eucharist delivers men from Purgatory inasmuch as it is a satisfactory sacrifice for sin. But Christ's descent into hell was not satisfactory; yet it operated in virtue of the Passion, which was satisfactory, as stated above (Question 48, Article 2), but satisfactory in general, since its virtue had to be applied to each individual by something specially personal (49, 1, ad 4,5). Consequently, it does not follow of necessity that all were delivered from Purgatory by Christ's descent into hell.
[III.q.52.a.8.ad.3] Those defects from which Christ altogether delivered men in this world were purely personal, and concerned the individual; whereas exclusion from God's glory was a general defect and common to all human nature. Consequently, there was nothing to prevent those detained in Purgatory being delivered by Christ from their privation of glory, but not from the debt of punishment in Purgatory which pertains to personal defect. Just as on the other hand, the holy Fathers before Christ's coming were delivered from their personal defects, but not from the common defect, as was stated above (7, ad 1; 49, 5, ad 1).
The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas AquinasSecond and Revised Edition, 1920Literally translated by Fathers of the English Dominican ProvinceOnline Edition Copyright © 2009 by Kevin Knight Nihil Obstat. F. Innocentius Apap, O.P., S.T.M., Censor. Theol.Imprimatur. Edus. Canonicus Surmont, Vicarius Generalis. Westmonasterii.APPROBATIO ORDINISNihil Obstat. F. Raphael Moss, O.P., S.T.L. and F. Leo Moore, O.P., S.T.L.Imprimatur. F. Beda Jarrett, O.P., S.T.L., A.M., Prior Provincialis AngliæMARIÆ IMMACULATÆ - SEDI SAPIENTIÆ
JSON: /api/sources/opera-omnia-aquinas/summa-theologiae/tertia-pars/q052.json