First Book — Post-Resurrection Discourses

Tradition:
Gnostic Christian
Author:
Anonymous (Askew Codex)
Form:
Gnostic Christian dialogue
Approx. date:
c. 300 CE
Source context· Greco-Christian stream · Greco-Latin cultural age
Stream
Greco-Christian
Cultural age
Greco-Latin (4th post-Atlantean cultural age)
Composed
c. 300 CE
Soul-faculty
Intellectual Soul

What this work carries

This text surfaces post-resurrection initiatory teaching preserved in the Askew Codex, transmitting cosmological schema of light-worlds, repentance, and the soul's ascent through successive aeons. It carries forward Hellenistic mystery-wisdom recast through a Christological frame, encoding knowledge of supersensible hierarchies and the soul's fate after death. The dialogue form itself reflects older mystery-school structures in which the risen initiator instructs chosen disciples.

Language frame

The work is written in Coptic but draws on Greek Gnostic theological vocabulary — pistis, gnosis, aeon, archon, light-treasury — situating it within the Hellenistic syncretic milieu of late antique Egypt. Its form as an extended post-resurrection discourse distinguishes it from canonical gospel narrative, privileging esoteric instruction over public proclamation.

Steiner’s engagement

  • GA 228, 1923-07-28Steiner notes that Gnostic writings were systematically destroyed and that European knowledge of Gnosticism has been confined almost entirely to counter-writings produced by its opponents.
  • GA 69c, 1912-11-16Steiner identifies the Christ-impulse as the central developmental idea of Gnostic thought, citing Basilides, Marcion, and Valentinus as its leading representatives, and cautions against dismissing the Gnostics as mere fantasists.
  • GA 69c, 1914-01-10Steiner states that spiritual-scientific investigation reveals that the Gnostics drew their cosmological ideas from the deepest levels of clairvoyant perception available in their epoch.
  • GA 175, 1917-03-27Steiner notes that knowledge of Gnosticism long depended on hostile patristic sources — Justin, Irenaeus, Clement, Origen, Epiphanius — and names the Ophites among the leading Gnostic exponents.
  • GA 87, 1902-04-19Steiner observes that the Gnostics synthesised ancient religious systems of the whole world with a distinctive supersensible world-view reaching back into pre-Christian mystery traditions.
  • GA 87, 1902-03-29Steiner describes the Gnostic category of the 'messiah' as a being whose existence the Gnostics knew directly, and identifies Christianity as the turning-point at which the Gnostic world-view met its fulfilment.

Cross-tradition congruence

  • Neoplatonic emanation cosmology (Plotinus, Proclus)The Pistis Sophia's schema of descending aeons and the soul's return through light-worlds exhibits structural congruence with Neoplatonic emanationism, in which the soul descends from the One through successive hypostases and ascends by reversal of the same path.
  • Vedantic liberation teaching (moksha, samsara)The text's insistence on gnosis as the sole vehicle of liberation from material entrapment and cyclic rebirth shows cross-tradition congruence with Vedantic moksha-doctrine, though the Gnostic frame is explicitly Christological rather than Brahman-centred.
  • Jewish Merkabah / Hekhalot mysticismThe ascent through guarded heavenly palaces presided over by named archons exhibits cross-tradition congruence with Merkabah literature's account of the soul's passage through successive celestial halls.

JSON: /api/sources/pistis-sophia/book-1/index.json · Back to Sources.