Lecture II-V

GA 104a/1909-05-14/p005 ·1909-05-14 · English HighHigh alignmentThis translation's paragraph count matches the German original — the locus maps cleanly to the same paragraph in DE.
Record: listeners' notes. Written from listeners' notes, summaries, or memory rather than a shorthand transcript. The wording is the note-taker's as much as Steiner's: weigh a single striking phrase here far more cautiously than the same phrase in a stenographic volume, and do not rest an argument on one word. Evidence: «Teilnehmeraufzeichnungen von vier Vorträgen» (Participants' records of four lectures). Rudolf Steiner Verlag Gesamtverzeichnis 2022, volume subtitle. The translation is the maintainer's, not a published one.

This is expressed in the myth of Prometheus;[^1] it is expressed so tragically in the drama of Aeschylus[^2] when Io, who has become insane, appears to Prometheus. Io represents the old clairvoyant consciousness that, in this fourth epoch, could no longer appear in normal states of consciousness but only in a state of madness. Science in the modern sense did not yet exist in the earliest times of our culture. Only gradually did the human being become a seeker in that science which can independently research the external world independently. For this reason something like science has only existed since Thales.[^3] It is an abstraction to speak of “oriental philosophy.” Those who began science with Thales were right: before them science was always inspired, born out of the mysteries. That was the case with Heraclitus,[^4] who was still inspired by ancient mystery wisdom. We are told that he placed his book on the altar of the goddess of Ephesus.

Read this passage in another edition
DEoriginalENEnglish
Raw JSON: /v1/steiner/en/ga/104a/1909-05-14/p005.json
Cite: GA 104a/1909-05-14/p005 · edition English