Our Thought Life in Sleep and Wakefulness and in the Afterlife

GA 224/1923-06-21/p031 ·1923-06-21 · English MediumMedium alignmentSome paragraph re-numbering between this translation and the German original — the locus may slip by a paragraph or two.
Record: unknown. How this text was taken down (shorthand transcript, listeners' notes or manuscript) is not on record here. Unknown is not an assurance of a stenogram: check the edition's own notes before resting an argument on one word.

So it is a matter of our really being able to understand the physical world precisely because we can correctly grasp the relationship of this physical world to the spiritual world. It is not enough to say that the physical world is based on a spiritual world. At best, this leads to the trivial idea that there is the physical human being, and somewhere there floats a spiritual archetype. You cannot arrive at a conception of the physical human being. You can only understand the physical human being in such a way that the spiritual world stands in a completely different relationship to one half of the human being than to the other half, and that between them there is a point of equilibrium untouched by either, which constitutes human freedom.

Read this passage in another edition
DEoriginalENEnglish
Raw JSON: /v1/steiner/en/ga/224/1923-06-21/p031.json
Cite: GA 224/1923-06-21/p031 · edition English