Epic of Gilgamesh

Tradition:
Babylonian / Akkadian
Author:
Anonymous (Sumerian and Akkadian seers)
Form:
epic
Approx. date:
c. 1300 BCE
Written down in:
Egypto-Chaldean epoch

Standard Version compiled c. 1300–1000 BCE from earlier Sumerian oral and written sources reaching back to the 3rd millennium BCE.

Source context· Persian stream · Ancient Persian cultural impulse
Stream
Persian
Cultural impulse
Ancient Persian (2nd post-Atlantean cultural age)
Composed
c. 1300 BCE
Written down
Egypto-Chaldean (3rd post-Atlantean cultural age) manuscript epoch
Soul-faculty
Sentient Soul

What this work carries

The Gilgamesh epic surfaces the transitional consciousness of the Egypto-Chaldean epoch, in which atavistic clairvoyance carried over from the Ancient Persian time was beginning to withdraw. Its older oral roots reach back into the third millennium BCE Sumerian mystery-wisdom and preserve the memory of the post-Atlantean Flood-mysteries.

Language frame

Akkadian heroic epic on twelve cuneiform tablets, composed in saga-form around an initiation-friendship between two contrasting individualities. The narrative form belongs to a stage when mystery-content could still be communicated as outer historical legend.

Steiner’s engagement

  • GA 126, 1910-12-27Steiner treats the Gilgamesh epic as a document of occult evolution, identifying Uta-napishtim as the Babylonian Noah-figure and reading the epic as a record of post-Atlantean spiritual events.
  • GA 233, 1923-12-26Steiner describes Gilgamesh and Eabani (Enkidu) as two individualities representing different stages in the descent of human ego-consciousness, with Gilgamesh retaining older clairvoyant faculties and Eabani having descended late from a planetary existence.
  • GA 233, 1923-12-26Steiner identifies the high priest Xisuthros in the epic as the guardian of an ancient mystery that was a genuine successor to the Atlantean mysteries, which Gilgamesh sought out.
  • GA 233, 1923-12-27Steiner extends the picture of Gilgamesh and Eabani by tracing their further incarnations and connecting their stream to the cosmic consciousness preserved in ancient mysteries up to Alexander.
  • GA 233, 1923-12-29Steiner contrasts the Gilgamesh epoch with later western consciousness: in the time of the epic one cannot yet speak of memory of past ages, but of present experience of cosmic realities.
  • GA 237, 1924-07-08Steiner returns to the individualities connected with the Gilgamesh epic in the karmic-relationships lectures, extending what was given at the Christmas Foundation Meeting.

Cross-tradition congruence

  • Hebrew Flood narrative (Noah)Uta-napishtim's transmission of the Flood-account to Gilgamesh parallels the Noah tradition, both preserving the memory of the Atlantean catastrophe within post-Atlantean mystery-wisdom.
  • Greek heroic initiation (Heracles, Achilles-Patroclus)The Gilgamesh-Eabani friendship as initiation-pair structurally anticipates the Greek hero-companion motif in which a more earthly and a more spiritual individuality work together.

JSON: /api/sources/epic-of-gilgamesh/index.json · Back to Sources.